This could
possibly warm ice and water behind those huge dams and result in the beginning of undercutting at the bottom part of the ice dam, as well as at the top.
Not exact matches
At first we thought that this was
possibly the most useless discovery ever made, but then we realised that the
ice could serve at least one beneficial purpose: Eskimos could put it in their drinks to
warm them up.
Beneath an
ice layer about 10 to 15 miles (15 - 25 kilometers) thick, the moon is thought to harbor a liquid water ocean,
possibly warmed by geologic processes originating in the planet's core.
We know, however, that rapid
warming of the planet increases the risk of crossing climatic points of no return,
possibly setting in motion large - scale ocean circulation changes, the loss of major
ice sheets, and species extinctions.
Ice - sheet responses to decadal - scale ocean forcing appear to be less important,
possibly indicating that the future response of the Antarctic
Ice Sheet will be governed more by long - term anthropogenic
warming combined with multi-centennial natural variability than by annual or decadal climate oscillations.»
Could you comment on the recent articles about the reduction in sunspot activity
possibly negating the effect of global
warming and even putting us into another Little
Ice Age.
This rise may have been eustatically controlled,
possibly through a combination of thermal expansion of the oceanic water column and melting of unknown sources of high - altitude or polar
ice caps in response to global
warming.»
Another,
possibly best case scenario, shows that if global
warming did not exceed the 2 degree Celsius benchmark, the millennial sea - level rise from the melting of Antarctic
ice could likely be restricted to a few meters.
Are you saying if the sea
ice is an insulator between the water below and the air above, and the water is
warmer than the air (
warm enough to melt the
ice), the melting
ice would have a
warming influence on the air above, and
possibly could be the cause of all the
warming of the air?
Bottom line is current epoch is an
ice age and if there's any damn thing humans can
possibly to
warm it up to the normal non-
ice age conditions it should be embraced not shunned.
Several degrees of
warming is not trivial, it would result in sea level rises large enough to wipe out many coastal areas which are currently heavily populated - parts of Florida, Bangladesh, India, Bangkok, etc, etc, quite apart from other changes
possibly precipitated by the loss of the
ice caps.
The climate forecast for 2100 looks to be about the same - the world's climate (s) will be about the same as today,
possibly a bit
warmer or cooler (<.5 degC), with rain, drought, hurricanes, large amounts of polar
ice, and the possiblity of some worldwide disaster.
Indeed, the Minoan, Roman and Medieval
warm periods suggest one cycle has a cycle length of ~ 900 years and most —
possibly all — global
warming of the last 300 years is recovery from the Little
Ice Age which is part of this cycle.
We'd see a huge hotspot in the upper tropo in the arctic, but this would be heat leaving the system and there'd be a gain in arctic sea
ice that would reduce
warming and
possibly act as a carbon sink.
It has been predicted that global
warming from human activity in the twentieth and twenty - first centuries will heat the Earth so much and for so long that it will suppress the next
ice age, which is not due to arrive for 50,000 years, and quite
possibly several
ice ages beyond.
Would you conclusion be that you couldn't
possibly blame taking this latter amount that melted on the
ice being in a
warmer environment because the temperature in the room hasn't changed between the two times you checked on the
ice?
Antartic must be a target as well for the
ice is
warming dramatically Southern ocean winds
possibly contributing to this.
A problem that arises in the context of attributing any effect to CO2 is that since the end of the Little
Ice Age, a natural
warming has
possibly increased the temperature monotonically, anthropogenic CO2 has increased monotonically, and deforestation and urbanization have increased monotonically.
MIS 11 also appears to have been
possibly the
warmest and longest interglacial of the past 5 million years and had an extended period with little or no continental
ice, which is projected to occur under some future global
warming scenarios.
Scientists are exploring the small but real possibility that even small shifts in ocean currents,
possibly set in motion by global
warming, may trigger the catastrophic melting of the world's two great
ice sheets.
For example, the argument that follows very substantially from the extent of continental shelf that there is within the Arctic Basin and, therefore, the particular relationship that
warming on that relatively shallow sea has on trapped methane - for example, the emergence of methane plumes in that continental shelf, apparently in quite an anomalous way - leading
possibly to the idea that there may be either tipping points there or catastrophic feedback mechanisms there, which could then have other effects on things, such as more stabilised caps like the Greenland
ice cap and so on.
At very best, his jumbled paper indicates that a)
warming Arctic loses
ice mass and b) the rate fluctuates with natural variability
possibly driven by various influences.