I wonder sometimes at why, and it may be as you said, that people would rather comment on
a post about doctrine and theology.
Not exact matches
All of the
posts so far show an extreme lack of understanding of Mormonism and it's
doctrines about baptisms for the dead.
All I was trying to do in this
post was spark some thinking and dialogue
about a few
doctrines that I thought warranted some further research and study.
Over the next several
posts, I will summarize what I was taught in Bible college and Seminary
about this
doctrine, and then, just as we did with inspiration, we will look at some of «the hard questions»
about inerrancy which are often avoided or ignored in most Bible Colleges, Seminaries, and churches.
Don't fall into CNN or Fox Network lies, they don't care
about God or your eternal salvation, just
posting something so Ungodly like this is so Bad, (listen... Get close to Christ the redeemer of mankind) don't get into foolish arguments like this, Hollywood and all media is just the tipping point of the iceberg of something more evil happening, and to believers: get your
doctrine straight and don't defend the works of this man (Stephen King) he is not giving glory to God with his live and work, there's many men of God that need your support that really give glory to God.
Stokes» most recent
post, entitled «What Steve McIntyre Won't Show You Now», contains a series of lies and fantasies, falsely claiming that I've been withholding MM05 - EE analyses from readers in my recent fisking of ClimateBaller
doctrines, falsely claiming that I've «said very little
about this recon [MM05 - EE] since it was published» and speculating that I've -LSB-...]
Ian: We're fans of Naomi Klein's work (see a recent
post on our blog the Thought Kitchen
about her latest groundbreaking book The Shock
Doctrine).
Continuing our series
about medical negligence, this
post looks at the
doctrine of «informed consent» as it relates to health care providers.