Sentences with phrase «post arguing a point»

There's been times when I start a blog post arguing a point, only to realize my claim was false after looking at the data.

Not exact matches

Law professor Eugene Volokh, who blogs about free speech issues at the Washington Post, has made the same point in the past to argue that Google's (GOOG) choice of search results are a form of free speech.

I completely agree about the parallel with Isaiah 22:22, but I am not sure what it has to do with the point I am arguing in this post.

Here was Alyssa Rosenberg at the Washington Post claiming that the whole point of Wonder Woman is that she's a role model for prepubescent girls, a kind of «Fearless Girl» avant la statue: «[T] he movie... argues that it's... little girls all over the world who stand to gain if they can grow up free of the distorting influence of misogyny,» Rosenberg wrote, with a schoolmarm's didacticism.

Point number six, of course, is stated in about a dozen different ways, with people arguing over what the actual requirement should be (repent and be baptized, confess your sins, say this prayer, etc, etc), but for the sake of this blog post, I don't really care about that.

From the earlier post I also think we do nt agree on the definition of judgmental so I wont argue that point.

Future posts will argue your second point, that we still need some doctrinal statements, but for purposes other than condemning and judging others.

I argued in another post that Paul's point here is not to work hard to get approved, but to work hard because you're already approved in Christ.

[Aside: Anyone who still thinks that good Christians do not pick and choose, and wants to continue to argue this point, must answer the following questions before posting a comment: # 1 Have you sold all of your belongings and given them to them to the poor?

The point of my post was not to argue the semantics of his name, just to point out that you're dumb for trying to correct people and act like you are smarter, know more about their religion, and hence you're correct on all your points.

Laughing — yet again you fail, you sit here and you tell me in one breath that i'm wrong in dealing with absolutes, Yet My whole point in the previous post was to point out that I can't blame science for killing Billions of people because they created the bombs and guns to do so... Just like you can't blame Christianity for people using violence against others, it's the people not the ideology that caused the violence, and i believe that... for whatever reason you apparently missed that and tried to make me sound like i honestly blame science for killing billions... so... maybe you need some reading and comprehension classes... i du n no, just would appreciate if you're going to argue with me, that you actually read my responses.

I then argue that at that point Guzman has a much better shot at covering the back post.

K's posts give me the impression that he thinks Wenger is at fault for all the evils and Wenger should be blamed for everything, he has his blame and that I do not argue against, I do think he ignores what he wishes to ignore to support his point of view.

But the point of my post is not to argue the details.

The main point of this post is that you are arguing that, ``... you can not rely on those other foods alone to supply your fat needs.»

I would argue that tofu does also, but that would not be my main point in this post..

Chris Kresser of The Healthy Skeptic [8] has argued this point of view in his post «Iodine for hypothyroidism: like gasoline on a fire?».

I really don't give a flying f*ck if you read my posts or not, but do try and at least muster the energy to read up on the point you're so eloquently arguing before arguing it.

The point was brought home with a thud by University of California at Berkeley professor Bruce Fuller last week in a Washington Post op - ed that argued that «as the pre-K bandwagon gains steam, it's careering into hazardous territory.»

And, by the way, it really was just one line he seemed to dislike — the point of the post was to argue against spending yet more taxpayer dough on an education - centered stimulus, not for complete separation of school and state.

As Steele points out in his post, this access to digitized editions for those with specific needs is not the free - for - all that critics might argue.

«Publishers would become profitable in short order if entrenched agents and editors weren't allowed to have veto power over innovative proposals, running their jaded, cynical eyes over every hint of freshness, trained in being subservient lapdogs to master strategists holding the keys to the riches,» Shavani argued in the post, pointing out what indie presses and self - published authors alike have experienced: the gatekeeper mentality.

Chimerical post-script: Not completely sure where it fits in, but I think it does: Robin and José Afonso Furtado pointed me to this post by Mike Shatzkin about the future of bookselling, arguing (I'm paraphrasing) that with online retailers like Amazon obliterating physical bookstores, we need a new kind of intermediary that helps curate and consolidate books for the consumer, «powered» by Amazon.

In our final blog post of 2017, we argued that the 2018 investment «vintage» would likely be defined by history as marking a cyclical turning point within a much larger secular bull market for global risk assets.

This post on Falkenblog (which I found via Larry MacDonald's Investment Ideas blog) captures the prevailing mood by arguing that the equity premium does not exist by making the following points:

Delta Points had an interesting post this afternoon, arguing that because the Barclaycard Rewards MasterCard is being discontinued (or maybe just his application link — it isn't clear), the... [Read more...] about The Barclaycard Arrival World MasterCard Isn't Going Anywhere

Delta Points had an interesting post this afternoon, arguing that because the Barclaycard Rewards MasterCard is being discontinued (or maybe just his application link — it isn't clear), the Barclaycard Arrival World MasterCard may also be on the chopping block.

You can not argue that there is nothing for him when Sony at this point keeps posting sales for the same games for the thousandth time.

Arguing his point further in defense of nuclear energy, Kakodkar said that environmental radiation that people are exposed to even in normal rooms is 100 times higher than the radiation at the fence post of a nuclear plant.

Rather than argue about little rhetorical points and taking down someone else's article or points, I prefer to clarify the big picture issues, which is why I did this post rather than continue the argumentation about mainly rhetorical points on the previous two threads.

The whole issue of cherry picking start and end dates is a red herring, as I've argued in my previous post Trends, change points and hypotheses.

It is an event «outside the realm of regular expectations» but one can't say «nothing in the past can convincingly point to its possibility» In my 2006 post, I argued that rapid polar warming and the potential for a melting of the tundra and massive release of methane was a black swan.

How well does that model fit the global temp time series, just how significant is the trend in ARIMA models of the global temp series (and over what period — I'm presuming you are arguing it emerges at some point post AGHG concentrations being significant), and was ARMA (1,1) noise the model Jones was really talking about in his comments?

The veterans have seen and participated in all the arguments, and when they see an argument raised (such as Stephen Schneider) that they think has been argued to death, and where the poster appears to be opposed to their point of view, they tend to be quick to assume that the poster is aware of this fact and is just trying to be irritating, as if his post had been the last post of a thread in which all viewpoints on that topic had already been expressed and thoroughly explored.

We can argue the points of climate change science for 400 posts but what about morality and responsibility — are they words in the skeptics vocabulary?

To others, The reason that Tamino addressed that one point is because Monckton was arguing with commentators in the real climate comments underneath the post on that topic.

There is, I would argue, a general consensus among both information providers and information users that the electronic storage and online retrieval of large amounts of legal information, is inherently more efficient and, as Ted Tjaden points out in his posting this week, an increasing number of previously print - only monographs, treatises, and textbooks now coexist in both print and electronic formats.

You could argue that if a number of your clients are already on Facebook, you could set up a Group and invite them to join you for updates on various legal points, or to feed in your blog posts — this would be a sensible example of marketing to your existing client base.

So, I suppose that the quote, overall, incorporates my thoughts on the issue of lawyers and emerging technology, although one could argue that the last phrase contradicts my point in the post.

Venture capitalist Fred Wilson makes exactly this point in a blog post Thursday, in which he argues that the economics around mobile platforms such as the iPhone and the iPad (s aapl)-- and other tablets, presumably — will likely come to look a lot like the economics of the web itself, in which closing off access to content via paywalls and walled gardens has not proven to be a very successful long - term approach (with a few notable exceptions such as The Economist and the Wall Street Journal (s nws)-RRB-.

in hindsight to my earlier post, if anyone wants to argue this with me one on one in guild wars please feel free to message me by the name ketogen kimura, i'd be glad to argue \ agree with anyone who wants to raise a point pertaining specifically with gw

In a Q&A, which is posted on the New York Fed's website, the economists question bitcoin's utility, arguing it will never be as easy to use as the current central bank - backed fiat money, pointing to a host of concerns — not the least of which surrounds trust.

Ian McAuley, a lecturer in public sector finance at the University of Canberra, makes a similar point in this post, arguing that the more private insurance is used to fund healthcare, the more expensive the healthcare system becomes.

I think I proved quite well in my earlier post why the 15 yr note is far more powerful in terms of cash flow over the full 30 yrs on the note illustrated; however, regardless of what has been argued to this point regarding cash flow of 15 vs 30, the power of a 30 yr note over a 15 yr note in the first 15 yrs is buying power through leverage.

I've got nowhere near the sophistication that some of you have regarding economics (though I pay attention and am a fast learner), so I'm not really posting to argue a point, as much as to learn from your perspectives.