Sentences with phrase «post as responses»

I'm seeking reactions to the Nature paper from a variety of researchers focused on the interface of climate and health and will update this post as responses come in.
I have queried the government of Iceland and the Obama administration on the expanded whale hunt and will update this post as responses come in.
I meant for the post directly below me to be posted as a response to someone further down below but that is okay.
This reveal follows a previous tease on Reddit, posted as a response to a fan inquiry about the slow drip of Founder - exclusive content.
This is great and I'd like to post it as a response to Gates as is, but also to circulate it to others in various arenas for further discussion.
I post this as a response to Dr. Forest but it may not be the right place.
The graph that Gavin posts as a response to # 7 (ignoring for the moment the spike pasted on) is derived from a handful of non-random locations around the planet and not sampled at 700 times / year rather maybe once, or often once every hundred years or so.

Not exact matches

When a Norwegian newspaper editor — who posted the photo as part of a series on war photography — tried to re-post it, along with a response from Phuc herself, his account was suspended.
In response, Smith called for the woman to be given a personal apology as well as «good enough pay to live in this city» — a post that was retweeted hundreds of times.
As he reported in a post shortly after, the response was overwhelming.
Povich says she privately messages customers who post less - than - stellar reviews, but notes she'll add public responses as well so anyone who comes to her page will know she acknowledges all of her customers.
The Washington Post blog was ultimately revised with an editor's note: «The post occasioned three rebuttals (here, here and here) as well as a response from the authPost blog was ultimately revised with an editor's note: «The post occasioned three rebuttals (here, here and here) as well as a response from the authpost occasioned three rebuttals (here, here and here) as well as a response from the authors.
In response to negative coverage in Jeff Bezos» Washington Post, Trump claimed Bezos bought the paper as a «tax shelter» that he could use to block antitrust action against Amazon (AMZN), which he described as a monopoly.
The process for doing this is not as easy as it could be, but each response gets attached to the original, while still being a standalone post in its own right.
Their initial responses are below, and we will continue to update this post as more come in.
Users can see and comment on one another's responses to the challenges, but unlike Facebook, where users collect «likes,» or Instagram, where favored posts rack up hearts, Maverick doesn't use social affirmation as a currency.
SAN FRANCISCO, April 3 Facebook is expanding its response to what it sees as malicious actors using the platform improperly and on Tuesday said it had deleted hundreds of Russian accounts and pages associated with a «troll factory» indicted by U.S. prosecutors for fake activist and political posts in the 2016 U.S. election campaign.
I've asked the Finance Department to confirm that and will post the response as soon it is received.
In this context, we may ask you to provide contact information such as your name, email address, and physical address; social media information such as your social profile; login information such as user name and password; and other information such as survey responses, photo uploads, and forum posts.
Although it was intended only as a statement on the company's position on the trade deal, and «nothing beyond that issue,» a company spokeswoman said in an email, it became kindling for protests from Trump opponents, some of whom posted videos to social media of their sneakers being set on fire in response.
It did not take long before Musk acknowledged the request, posting a simple «Yes» as a response.
Mr. Brown wrote a widely circulated post about his experience, in which he lost around $ 8,000 worth of virtual currency from his Coinbase account, all as he sat online and watched, getting no response from the customer service at either Coinbase or Verizon.
In one response you have referred to me as silly, accused me of being unable to reconcile my beliefs to scripture, accused me of stalling, rambling on and on, (love the irony in this one... grin), likened me to a tween, insinuated I do not know or rightly divide scripture, referred to me as sensitive, and implied my post was immature.
You might want to re-read what Ted M. initially posted, and then your responses... to me at least... what you wrote was not an isomorphic argument that in any way refuted Ted's, and i think - Ace made reference to that as well as - Ted.
That post was supposed to be meant as a response to herbert juarez on the previous page, but apparently CNN decided it didn't want to work that way.
«In Internet slang, a troll (/ ˈtroʊl /, / ˈtrɒl /) is a person who sows discord on the Internet by starting arguments or upsetting people, by posting inflammatory, extraneous, or off - topic messages in an online community (such as a newsgroup, forum, chat room, or blog) with the deliberate intent of provoking readers into an emotional response or of otherwise disrupting normal on - topic discussion.»
My disagreement with your response above is that I wouldn't say he disgusts me — dealing with his approach is exasperating and the dogmatic ideology he promotes is certainly in the disgusting category, but I wouldn't characterize a person whom I only know through a few heated posts as disgusting.
AND I do own every word I have posted on any of these blogs, they have not been hateful, I have asked clarfying questions, to get a better grasp on your point of view, and mopst of time you are using innane insulting expletives as your response.
It's always rewarding to read such thoughtful responses such as the one posted by ShawnHD.
The post is so full of historical inaccuracies, theological problems, and contradictions that it's hard to know where to start, but I want to make clear from the get - go that my response to this post should not be seen as an attack on Tim Challies himself, (who I respect and like), but rather a response to the general belief that God's presence is limited to the pages of Scripture and that all forms of contemplative or experiential spirituality should therefore be dismissed out of hand or regarded with suspicion.
If you are don't indirectly or directly elude to me, I won't bother you; however, when you do as you did in your post about me, expect a response.
I fail to see how that response has anything to do with the point that I was trying to make, and, seeing as how you seem to have missed my postings intention entirely, I will not bother reading too deeply into your thoughtful analysis of my commentary in return, which would no doubt be an engaging and intellectual adventure.
This post was stirred up by my friend Heather of the EO's letter to her lesbian non-Christian friend, and her friend, Vikki's, gracious letter in return, as well as the responses and repostings I've witnessed.
What I see as sad are two competing but similar responses in our post modern culture - the absence of feeling and the bathing in feeling.
I wish that Jeremy would put a «email me when new comments are made» button on this site, as I would have been much happier to read the clear, concise and compassionate responses that were posted after my last comment.
Just as ridiculous is the post modern response of «they cant change» - which if true would mean that any addiction or sin would be unchangeable despite the facts humans change all the time and I am NOT speaking of through Christ.
P.S.This post was a response (in part) by me to another poster, on related blog, but it was fitting to post it again as a response to your post.
@Poltergeist — Not precisely sure of the intent of the original evolved ligase post or your response, but is it safe to say that this study, as with other in vitro evolution research, is proof of concept, i.e. random variation and selection can and does yield novel functionality?
In internet slang, a troll is someone who posts inflammatory, extraneous, or off - topic messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum, chat room or blog, with the primary intent of provoking other users into an emotional response or of otherwise disrupting normal on - topic discussion.
There were dozens and dozens of «response posts» written about me, shaming all over again, but twice as many were written saying, «Me, too!
Similarly, in response to Wednesday's post, I heard from Christians on «Side A» as well as Christians on «Side B» who were united in their desire to move beyond a culture war mentality when it comes to homosexuality.
Funny how the people that don't agree with you are being juvenile, whereas other people like Bob (who has been caught lying time and time again and posts such witty responses as «blah blah blah») are apparently completely mature.
I contend, as I did in response to another post below, that all the morals that you are calling objective are simply more morals born out of consensus.
That was in response to someone who misquoted my one post about not being responsible for a coworker who wasted his time to say that I am not responsible as long as im not the mother.
I will read all of the responses and select one of the posts to feature as a guest post here at my blog — that person will also receive three signed copies of the book.
After 24 - hours, I'll pose five of the most popular questions to Wright and then post his responses as soon as he sends them to me.
Shadowflash, I don't recall your response to any of my posts... I usually do recall them... But I do agree with one thing you said... «human mind hates being wrong» But I see it differently then you do... I see human mind and human understanding being the stumbling block and point of pride, which prevents man from seeing the reality of his real condition, and the need to humble himself in order to be able to see himself as he is, and seek the help of His Creator without whom he is a living, moving shell, yet, without the vital part of him being alive, which would make him complete.
Your responses are often missed because they are presented as new posts... far flung from the original.
I am posting this also as a response to my friend John Lewis's comment on my previous post and because of my friends mentioned above, as well as because of a student paper that insisted that Romney's website answered all questions about his policy proposals, while the guys here say Romney never addresses policy specifics.
Hawkins's official response to the college, which she posted on her website, quoted part of Wheaton's questions, including a request to «clarify how it is that we worship the same God if Muslims can not affirm that God is the Father of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob; or that God the Father is indeed the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ; or that the Father did not spare his only begotten Son; or that the Father, Son and Holy Spirit coexist as a Trinity in eternal and self - giving love?»
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z