Sentences with phrase «post in the comments what»

Post in the comments what you think.

If you don't see something you are interested in, please post in the comments what you are looking for.

Not exact matches

«As for the coverage, he doesn't get involved in it at all — not what stories to do or what not to do; he doesn't comment on any stories, including about Amazon, he just doesn't,» Marty Baron, executive editor of the Washington Post, said Thursday at an annual dinner for Columbia University's Knight - Bagehot journalism fellowship.

As board member Fred Wilson notes in a blog post supportively commenting on the new policy: «Etsy is a global company with significant operations in countries with parental leave regulations that are more generous than what exists in the US.

What he meant was something «slightly more measured» than Elon Musk's idea of building colonies on Mars, as Recode noted in a post about Bezos's comments.

In the comments of our post on Facebook advertising budgets, Lucie shared this great tidbit about how to gauge what's working and what's not:

Donald Sterling makes a couple of comments in what he thought was a private conversation, but the comments are mysteriously posted online.

I suggest you read your hysterical comments on the last post of your predictions for what would pass in Congress and then compare that to reality.

> To Architect Chick — First, thank you SO much for sharing your story because this is a perfect example of what we've been talking about in the comments on this post so far.

Facebook Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg commented on Koum's post, saying he was grateful for what Koum taught him about encryption «and its ability to take power from centralized systems and put it back in people's hands.

Please let me know what you think in the comments below, and don't forget to share the post, if you liked it!

When Kyle Kashuv, one of the more prominent figures in the ongoing debate about what to do to reduce high school mass shootings, went to a shooting range with his father last Friday, the first thing he did was post some pictures and some pro-Second Amendment comments on Twitter.

The «goal post» comment was in response to what I saw in the coversation.

you already posted this comment like 4 pages back and no one cared then and no one will now plus atheists do nt believe in satan its evident you do nt know that satanists are atheists and what is statan?

Just as a point of clarification to Bill's post above, while I welcome what I thinkis a imporant point we should al keep in mind I would in no way ever see myself as an important part of the conversation more a present somewhat comenting bystander although my ego was very flattered when I read Bill's comment

I had noticed that a couple of people had commented earlier regarding the OP, so that's what I did, as well as posting something personal having to do with the change of topic to participate in the conversation and, hopefully, help with the healing going on here in some way.

Share your own favourites on your blog, and post your link in the comments, or just let me know what you think or recommend.

I made a comment about what you might do in a * hypothetical * situation related to an article that * you * posted and now don't seem to understand.

I wonder if you ever use old cartoons, and re draw them with improvements from what you learned in comments when you last posted them, or with updates in your thinking.

I am reading your newest posts to your oldest.I have never been to bible school but I consider myself in the journey of education concerning the bible.more than any opinions that you have what concerns me most is how «brothers and sisters» through their comments responds to someone who thinks differently from what is perceived as absolutes (not sure if that's the right term) in scripture.I wonder did the apostle believe half the things that are seen as church doctirine today?how did the disciples who did not have the new testament or the ability to read follow Jesus?I appreciate your questioning.In my experience we are too quick to try and fix someone or use the scriptures as a control mechanism and to slow to practise empathy and love..

What I see being painted (in the post and the comments) is a picture of the painfully dysfunctional local church.

Having read most, if not all of the posts Jeremy has written that directly or as an aside discuss Calvinism, I am certain that most or all of what you are stating in the above comment is not what Jeremy is saying.

just look at the hate filled comments that fill this comment page... it is disgusting what many of the posts say... in addition, it is very acceptable to post what Christians would consider blasphemous statements on this.

If you have to preface what you are about to post with a warning that — despite the forth - coming comments — you are not racist, bigoted, closed - minded (or fill in the blank), then we've got some unfortunate news: You're probably about to write something racist, bigoted or closed - minded.

Despite the negativity of some of the comments in this post, this is exactly what I needed to hear (or read rather).

This is to davidnfran hay David you might have brought this up in a previous post I haven't read, but i did read quit a bit about your previous comments and replies at the beginning of this blog, so I was just wondering in light of what hebrews 6 and 10 say how would you enterprite passages like romans 8 verses 28 thrue 39 what point could paul have been trying to make in saying thoughs amazing things in romans chapter 8 verses 28 thrue 39 in light of hebrews 6 and 10, Pauls says that god foreknew and also predestined thoughs whom he called to be conformed to the image of his son so that he would be the first born among many brothers and then he goes on saying that neither death nor life nor angels nor rulers nor things present nor things to come nor powers nor hight nor death can ever separate us from the love of god in christ jesus so how would i inturprate that in light of that warning in hebrews 6 and 10,

And so you don't have to keep asking why I'm ignoring most of what you posted in your original post is that I'm only commenting on the part that really pertains to this blog.

You have probably seen Sam comment on several posts over the past month or so, and after hearing some about what he is doing in San Diego, I wanted to hear more, and I know that many of you do to.

They weren't doing those things because today what it means to be a Christian is to sit on your lazy butt in front of your computer and post comments under news articles that state your opinions and put others down with judgement and hatred.

Pointing out what is a trend (not an absolute truth) in the comments does not make a post immature, but the language and the response to criticism will.

@ Umme Omar — When I first posted my comment, I clearly said that I do not believe in Allah, but when someone contradicts in what I believe, that is being disrespectful.

I keep hopping on here to post a nasty, hateful, typically christian comment and then I run really fast to another board so that I don't have to see what people say to me in response.

So until God raises up something new in my life, or gives me direction on what He wants me to do, or maybe just gives me permission to pick back up where I left off because I needed a Sabbath rest, I will not regularly publish new blog posts, write new books, respond to comments, or interact with people much on the various social sites.

Update (Feb. 1): In his first public comments, Saeed Abedini told the Idaho Statesman that «much of what I have read in Naghmeh's posts and subsequent media reports is not true,» but he plans to work on rebuilding their marriage in private because «personal issues are best dealt with personally.&raquIn his first public comments, Saeed Abedini told the Idaho Statesman that «much of what I have read in Naghmeh's posts and subsequent media reports is not true,» but he plans to work on rebuilding their marriage in private because «personal issues are best dealt with personally.&raquin Naghmeh's posts and subsequent media reports is not true,» but he plans to work on rebuilding their marriage in private because «personal issues are best dealt with personally.&raquin private because «personal issues are best dealt with personally.»

That's what Kate the Great, aka, Kate Pitrone, Ashland grad, community college teacher, mother, and longtime high - quality No Left Turns commenter says in a comment to this Powerline post.

In a way Religion is for Dummies... reading your comments has been true pleasure because I did not think it was actually possible to have a discussion with someone who would post a comment that stupid on a board... there is a god or there is no god because I say so because of my limited experience... what wonderful ignorance most people here have...

To answer your question, I disagree with some of what you wrote here, but rather than express that, in this instance I felt it better to share Paul's thoughts on some of the topics in your post and in the comments / thread as I thought that would be more helpful and more fruitful than my thoughts.

I blame my good friend Stephen Hammond and what he pointed out in the comments of the previous post.

None of what David has commented on in his recent post affirms the faith you have that Christian belief in God is akin to belief in an imaginary friend.

Several posts comment on the support and dispute of what meditation is in Buddhist context and even further argue the spiritual side of this school of thought.

If you have other suggestions on what true beauty is and how to help the women in our lives feel lovely, please post them in the comments section for others to read.

Regarding some of the comments on this post and on other past posts, I measure what those who claim to follow Jesus and trust in the written word, write or say by Paul's measure «But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, forbearance, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness and self - control.»

What cracks me up, Let it Be, is that you're so stupid you didn't even manage to figure out that I was commenting from your side of the field in support of your post.

You may not know it, but this post is a small part of a much longer series on how to understand the violence of God in the Bible, and in those other posts I have presented ideas quite similar to what you are saying in your comment.

I think it is along some of the same ideas as what has been said above (and in many, many other posts / comments)

So if you have read this far, do NOT comment on this post, but instead, share it on Facebook or Twitter, then sit back to see what sort of comments come in from people who read nothing but the title.

I am not sure that your comment has anything to do with what was written in the post...

I was writing blogs, reading blogs, commenting on blogs, commenting on comments, joining groups, creating groups, posting bulletins, reading bulletins, taking top ten quizzes that told the world what I thought about my favorite CDs, movies and what character I would be if I was living in the world of Buffy the Vampire Slayer!

None of these speak of a hierarchy where some are more called or «sent» than others, which is what was commented on in a previous post.

It took forever to post that comment... You just never know what words are acceptable in a CNN blog!