Sentences with phrase «post legal questions»

The Wisconsin Access to Justice Commission is pleased to announce the launch of Wisconsin Legal Advice Online (WLAO), a free online service that allows eligible Wisconsin residents to post legal questions for response by volunteer Wisconsin lawyers.

There are a number of legal advice websites where people post legal questions and lawyers post answers.

There you are, sitting in your office, when someone posts a legal question on Avvo.

They can also use the app to monitor and respond to posted legal questions.

A central feature of the site is a question - and - answer facility where a client, say, could post a legal question, and private practice lawyers would weigh in with answers to their queries.

Not exact matches

This is where you can get the requisite legal advice necessary via posts that tackle the most asked questions.

This is the first post in an ongoing series called «Ask An Adoption Attorney «-- your open adoption questions answered by a legal expert.

The question is a good one; I just wanted to discourage people from posting answers that say essentially «no, it's not legal because the law says that the republic may not take into account the fact that religions exist.»

But for the moment, amid a sea of names being floated — New York City Public Advocate Tish James, Assemblywoman Helene Weinstein, Nassau County District Attorney Madeline Singas among them — lawmakers are still working out more thorny legal questions of a joint session of the Senate and Assembly, which would be required to fill the post.

Senate Majority Leader Dean Skelos, over a four - day period, repeatedly ducked and dodged after The Post asked the simple question of whether he's representing legal clients who have business before state government.

As they consider campaigns, Mr. Maloney and Ms. Rice face the same complicated legal question: Can they simultaneously seek re-election, which they have already filed for, and the attorney general post?

Former Assemblyman Richard Brodsky, in a piece published on the Huffington Post earlier today, is questioning Gov. Andrew Cuomo's plan to enact a Moreland Act Commission to investigate the Legislature following its failure to pass any reform bills — especially public campaign finance — saying the legal basis for this move» is at best uncertain, if not flat wrong.»

The president's tweets, posted on a Saturday in which he remained inside the White House with no public schedule, came as Mr. Mueller is said to have sent questions to Mr. Trump's legal team as part of negotiations over an interview with the president.

Katherine Graham (Meryl Streep), publisher of The Washington Post, is going over a list of financial and legal documents once again, rehearsing her answers to the questions she will be getting from bankers about selling shares in the company to the public for the first time.

As a result of his having won their support, he was appointed in 1988 for a seven year term, which was renewed in 1995 and 2002, and then this year [2008] determined by them to be a permanent post because of changes in employment law — an interpretation questioned on both legal and ethical grounds by lawyer and Stuckist artist, Leo Goatley, who has written to the Culture Minister to express his concerns.

Consumers have posted more than a million legal questions to Avvo in the last five years, the company says.

The letter expressed concern that the blog post in question sent «a message that legal research and writing («LRW») courses are not rigorous, underestimates the ability of LRW faculty to comment on students» cognitive skills, harms students by discounting the valuable and thoughtful insight we have to offer about students seeking to transfer to Yale, and devalues LRW professors as a whole.»

Speaking of legal consumers, they may be out there asking questions or leaving useful comments on your social media posts.

On March 13, 2017, I wrote a post about the startup LawTova, with the headline, Legal Startup Appears to Shut Down After I Question Its Management.

If you've heard or seen a question in forums, on social media or in sessions at a legal conference, there's a good chance an answer would make for a solid blog post.

Ideas include: 1) writing about a recent news story as it relates to your practice areas, 2) writing about new cases as they are issued and include your take on the case, 3) writing about another blogger's recent post and provide an opposing, or alternate, viewpoint, or 4) answering questions about the legal process that clients typically ask you, such as what types of information they should bring to the first appointment or how long a jury trial might last.

This post is a forum for the students in your classes to pitch ideas on the following question: How Can the Legal Industry Improve the...

I took the two following questions to the virtual street, posting on the Legal Tech LinkedIn group, asking on Twitter, and emailing lawyers on both sides of the equation.

Many results have been posted on various legal websites by so called SEO professionals, and in most of them they have shown that, in conjunction with compelling content that answers questions, AND that content being picked up by other sites, in the form of citations to the original document, using the tool has helped their clients» websites get better rankings.

That is but one of the philosophical questions you may ask yourself after reading The Existential Exercise of Finding State Court Materials Online, a post by Rachael Samberg at Legal Research Plus.

««Dragon Dictation» Makes Dictating Documents, Emails or Social Media Posts a Breeze Main The Day's Three Burning Legal Questions»

Posts — most of which are in video form — are either directed at answering the questions of potential clients facing criminal charges in Arizona, offer the author's take on legal issues facing celebrities in the news, or cover the author's own successes in court.

Last March, I wrote a post here about LawPivot, a website where companies can pose legal questions and get answers from lawyers.

U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder, the nation's top lawyer, overruled the opinions of his own lawyers within the Office of Legal Counsel on the question of the constitutionality of giving the District of Columbia voting rights in the House of Representatives, reports The Washington Post.

Now you get to know these lawyers, talk to them, put questions to them, read their posts and legal articles.

At a recent CBA / SCC Liaison Committee meeting on Posting of Factums on the Web, the Supreme Court Justices raised questions concerning a number of legal and practical issues: * Who holds copyright in factums?

2) Question: I read your post on the legal hazards of «planking,» which suggested that perhaps plankers should move on to «Tebowing.»

Even better, Avvo provides a «content network» which allows lawyers to post answers to questions, post articles and legal guides, and other useful information for consumers.

Postings tend largely to come from people seeking answers to legal questions, and lawyers are often among those responding.

Attorneys can log on to their Rocket Lawyer dashboards to answer questions, review legal documents and publish blog posts.

«The Day's Three Burning Legal Questions Main «Dragon Dictation» Makes Dictating Documents, Emails or Social Media Posts a Breeze»

Last Monday I posted «Legal KM Economics & Realization Rates (Some Questions...) `.

Frankly, the best has been to get a couple of advocates who are willing to post on the local neighborhood / social media system in Seattle, NextDoor, when people have legal questions.

For example, Terence Corcoran questions why creditors are entitled to priority status over pensioners and maintains that «the legal and financial professionals who work the lucrative insolvency field in Canada have a list of reasons to put banks and other lenders ahead of employees and pensioners, none of which deserve the reverence and support they've received from Ottawa» («Pensioners victims of inaction in Ottawa», National Post, February 5, 2013, here).

This post explains nine questions legal teams should answer prior to beginning document review to prepare for an efficient workflow.

I ask — and answer — this question in a post today at Legal Blog Watch.

Following my post earlier this week about the benchmark report published by Blue Hill Research that assessed the ROSS Intelligence legal research platform, I had several questions about the report and many readers contacted me with questions of their own.

Legal Internet historian / law blog pioneer / lawyer / consultant / former Legal Blog Watch writer Bob Ambrogi posted an interesting question on his LawSites blog last week: Which law firm of more than 25 lawyers was the first to launch a website and when?

Yesterday, in the course of searching for my 2007 Legal Blog Watch post, I came across an even earlier post of my own — one that I'd forgotten about entirely — addressing this very question.

I belong to the Refugee Lawyers Association of Ontario, and people post questions related to legal interpretation and strategy daily.

Posts strive to address the legal questions and circumstances that arise in our everyday lives, including the laws that affect our family life, workplace and personal finances.

I noted in Wednesday's Three Burning Legal Questions post that a certain Appalachian Trail - hiking governor supposedly refused to promise to be «faithful» in his wedding vows years ago, and insisted that the clause be removed from the ceremony.

A relatively new option for finding answers to your questions is viewing legal videos posted online by attorneys.

In a two - part post the Legal Executive Institute is publishing this week and next, Bruce MacEwen, responds to this question with a provocative suggestion: «Abandon the partnership model.»

Orin Kerr's post on Thomas Adcock's report that the New York County Lawyers» Association has brokered a pact in which «more than 60 law firms have agreed to tell their corporate clients the composition of assigned legal teams by race, gender, ethnicity and sexual preference,» has elicited a landslide of comments and questions from The Volokh Conspiracy's readers.