Sentences with phrase «post right claim»

An obvious example of the pre-right claim would be the French Revolution; a clear example of the post right claim would be the civil rights campaign conducted by Martin Luther King Jr. in the United States in the 1960s.

Not exact matches

You agree to defend, indemnify and hold harmless NBCUniversal, its affiliates and their respective directors, officers, employees and agents from and against any and all claims, demands, actions, suits or proceedings, as well as any and all losses, liabilities, damages, costs and expenses (including reasonable legal fees and costs) arising out of or accruing from (a) any breach of these terms, including any of the foregoing provisions, representations or warranties, and / or from your placement or transmission of any content onto NBCUniversal's servers, and / or from any and all use of your account; (b) any material posted or otherwise provided by you (including without limitation User Content), or any other subscriber or user of your account that infringes any intellectual property right of any person or entity or defames any person or violates their rights of publicity or privacy; (c) any misrepresentation made by you in connection with your use of the online services; and (d) any breach of any of the representation, warranties or other terms or conditions relating to use of your User Content or the online services.

Assange has made a point of comparing his organization to traditional media outlets, saying in a recent opinion piece in the Post that his motive «is identical to that claimed by the New York Times and the Post — to publish newsworthy content,» and that WikiLeaks publishes material «irrespective of whether sources came by that truth legally or have the right to release it.»

And the false claims perpetuated in Ending the Fed's most - shared posts are well established tropes in right wing media: the leaked Podesta emails, alleged Saudi funding of Clinton's campaign, and a lack of credibility in media.

To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, you agree to indemnify, defend and hold harmless Daily Harvest, and our respective past, present and future employees, officers, directors, contractors, consultants, equityholders, suppliers, vendors, service providers, parent companies, subsidiaries, affiliates, agents, representatives, predecessors, successors and assigns (individually and collectively, the «Daily Harvest Parties»), from and against all actual or alleged Daily Harvest Party or third party claims, damages, awards, judgments, losses, liabilities, obligations, penalties, interest, fees, expenses (including, without limitation, attorneys» fees and expenses) and costs (including, without limitation, court costs, costs of settlement and costs of pursuing indemnification and insurance), of every kind and nature whatsoever, whether known or unknown, foreseen or unforeseen, matured or unmatured, or suspected or unsuspected, in law or equity, whether in tort, contract or otherwise (collectively, «Claims»), including, but not limited to, damages to property or personal injury, that are caused by, arise out of or are related to (a) your use or misuse of the Sites, Content or Products, (b) any User Content you create, post, share or store on or through the Sites or our pages or feeds on third party social media platforms, (c) any Feedback you provide, (d) your violation of these Terms, (e) your violation of the rights of another, and (f) any third party's use or misuse of the Sites or Products provided tclaims, damages, awards, judgments, losses, liabilities, obligations, penalties, interest, fees, expenses (including, without limitation, attorneys» fees and expenses) and costs (including, without limitation, court costs, costs of settlement and costs of pursuing indemnification and insurance), of every kind and nature whatsoever, whether known or unknown, foreseen or unforeseen, matured or unmatured, or suspected or unsuspected, in law or equity, whether in tort, contract or otherwise (collectively, «Claims»), including, but not limited to, damages to property or personal injury, that are caused by, arise out of or are related to (a) your use or misuse of the Sites, Content or Products, (b) any User Content you create, post, share or store on or through the Sites or our pages or feeds on third party social media platforms, (c) any Feedback you provide, (d) your violation of these Terms, (e) your violation of the rights of another, and (f) any third party's use or misuse of the Sites or Products provided tClaims»), including, but not limited to, damages to property or personal injury, that are caused by, arise out of or are related to (a) your use or misuse of the Sites, Content or Products, (b) any User Content you create, post, share or store on or through the Sites or our pages or feeds on third party social media platforms, (c) any Feedback you provide, (d) your violation of these Terms, (e) your violation of the rights of another, and (f) any third party's use or misuse of the Sites or Products provided to you.

Rosales has never filed a claim against a worker who violated a non-disparagement clause with an online post, and in his experience, he said, those clauses don't prevent workers from exercising their rights to speak about workplace conditions.

In particular, User shall not: i. Provide, post or otherwise distribute content which is defamatory, threatening, disparaging, grossly inflammatory, false, misleading, fraudulent, inaccurate, unfair, contains gross exaggeration or unsubstantiated claims, violates the privacy rights of any 3rd - party, is unreasonably harmful or offensive to any individual or community; ii.

You must have read about the wars and killings between Catholics and Protestants when there were only Two of them Christian branches but since then you became to have more than Two in branches and each claims to be on right path or true Church... this was noted from the words of fights i was able to read within several posts on these Religion blogs...

So did U.S. District Court Judge Amy Berman Jackson, who on December 9 rejected the archdiocese's claim that WMATA's refusal to post the ad violated its First Amendment right of free speech.

Every time you post I am more convinced that my position is right because you don't even attempt to address the issues that need to be overcome to consider your claim..

The church, which claims 15,000 regular attendees, posted a news release on its website stating that Schaap was dismissed «due to a sin that has caused him to forfeit his right to be our pastor.

In consideration of being permitted to use the Website, You agree to indemnify and hold harmless Non-GMO Project, and / or its officers, directors, employees, partners, contractors, affiliates, subsidiaries, agents, attorneys, web developers, technical support / maintenance providers, distributors, advertisers, licensors, sublicensees, and / or assigns, from any claim or demand, including reasonable attorneys» fees, expert witness fees, and court costs, made by any third party due to or arising out of Content You Post, Your use of the Website, including without limitation, Your participation in any interactive aspect of the Website, Your use of any information provided on or in connection with or obtained from the Website, Your violation of this Agreement, Your breach of any of the representations and warranties contained herein, or Your violation of any rights of another.

The SB Nation Twitter account for the Spartans posted the following about the former Sparty QB who will face Tom Brady: «#GoGreen #ProGreen (hey @UMichFootball did we do this whole «claim someone who barely played for our team» thing right?)»

United had one last great opening to claim all three points right at the death after substitute Cameron Borthwick - Jackson set up Rooney at the far post, only for the striker to miss the target and the chance to relieve the pressure on his under - fire boss, who insisted after that whistle that he would not resign.

No one has argued she didn't have the right to post this photo and claim it's somehow helping the cause.

In particular, we may disclose your identity to a third party who claims that any content posted or uploaded by you to the website constitutes a violation of their intellectual property rights, or of their right to privacy.

Cuomo's hand - picked MTA chair, Joe Lhota, ripped de Blasio for claiming New Yorkers have a right to eat on the trains — telling The NY Post that the mayor's comments are «incendiary» and that his cops needs to do more to stop subway litterbugs.

State Republicans plan to use Gov. Cuomo's stunning claim that «extreme conservatives» — defined as pro-life, pro-traditional marriage and supporters of gun rights — have «no place in New York» to challenge Democrats across the state in the fall elections, GOP strategists told The Post.

«I know that most of the attacks are coming from the New York Post,» Mr. Rangel told Observer today, claiming the right - leaning tabloid (and not the New York Times, which ran a front page story about Mr. Cuomo's Moreland Commission) was fermenting the controversy.

His campaign's Twitter feed, firing off posts left and right, was more direct tonight, highlighting statements of support and quoting a BuzzFeed article claiming Mr. Spitzer has a «screw loose.»

She claims to be a great advocate for human rights — but former employees tell The Post that behind closed doors, Kerry Kennedy is a monster who's driving her father's legacy into the ground.

To support the claim, a Molinaro spokesperson pointed to a New York Post article that relied on data and analysis from the right - leaning Tax Foundation.

I figured the easiest way to get it to you would be a blog post: http://cheznouscrafts.blogspot.com/2015/08/gloria-warnick.html My mother had claimed she searched the house and couldn't find it — it was right next to the chair.

So here's something about DateHookup.com that sucks: they claim permanent worldwide rights to use any content you post.

«Instead of stimulating worthy discussions about over-testing, cultural bias in tests, and the misuse of test data,» responded the anti-reform Network for Public Education in the Washington Post, «these activists would rather claim a false mantle of civil rights activism.»

More recently, The Third Circuit, in a case from Pennsylvania, affirmed a school board's motion for summary judgment in response to a teacher's claim that officials violated her free speech rights for terminating her employment over comments she posted on her blog (Munroe v. Central Bucks School District, 2015).

You agree to indemnify and hold the National Education Union and its affiliates, officers, agents, co-branders and other partners, and employees, harmless from any claim or demand, including reasonable attorneys» fees, made by any third party due to or arising out of content you submit, post to or transmit through the Service, your use of the Service, your connection to the Service, your violation of these terms and conditions, or your violation of any rights of another.

In a subsequent post on its website, the union went bonkers, claiming, «Corporate millionaires and special interests have mounted an all - out assault on educators by attempting to do away with laws protecting teachers from arbitrary firings, providing transparency in layoff decisions and supporting due process rights.»

By posting or uploading any Content on the Website: (i) you understand that if your Work is in aliterary categoryincluded on the Book Country Website, and complies with these General Terms of Use, your Work may be made accessible to users of the Website and members will be able to review, comment on it and rate it; (ii) you represent and warrant that (A) the Content does not contain any libelous matter or matter otherwise contrary to law or violate any rights of privacy or other personal or property right whatsoever and (B) you own or control all rights in your Content, that such Content is original and does not, and will not, infringe the copyright, trademark or any other right of any person or entity, and that any «moral rights» in the Content have been waived; and (iii) you grant to us a non-exclusive, worldwide, royalty - free, irrevocable, perpetual, transferable right and license (A) to display the Content on the Website, and (B) with respect to Content other than your Work, to use, display, reproduce, distribute, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, perform, make, sell and export such Content, in whole and in part, on the Website or in any formats and through any media, as we see fit, and you shall have no claims against Book Country for such use or non-use.

Bev, you claim you aren't dumb but your whole post about them bad Democrats is so full of far right fantasies you leave us no option other than concluding that you are just a bit dim.

Impermissible Uses.You understand that you may not: • modify, adapt or hack the Service or modify another website so as to falsely claim or imply that it is associated with the Service, AuthorMarketingClub.com, AMC, Author Marketing Club or any other AMC service; • reproduce, duplicate, copy, sell, resell or exploit any portion (including, without limitation, the contents of the AMC email or similar notification, the look and feel of the AMC website, and the contents of the web pages of the Service, use the Service or access the Service without the express written permission of Author Marketing Club; • verbally, physically, or otherwise abuse (including threats of abuse or retribution) any AMC member or AMC employee, agent or officer; • upload, post, host, or transmit unsolicited email, SMSs, or spam messages; • transmit worms or viruses or any code of a destructive nature; • as a Reader Member, utilize the information provided in a Query other than to provide a relevant response to a Specific Query posted by a Author Member; • violate any applicable federal, state or local laws or regulations; or, • plagiarize, violate or otherwise infringe upon the trademark, copyright, patent, trade secret, or any other rights of any person, firm or entity, expressly including but not limited to libel, slander or invasion of rights of privacy, publicity or «moral rights».

IU makes no claim on the rights of any materials submitted in the form of guest posts or other materials provided to and posted by IU staff.

· Disclose your identity or other information Simply you to any third party who claims that material posted by you violates their rights, including their intellectual property rights or their right to privacy.

ANY breed can turn out ferocious if they are poorly trained or have bad experiences, it's not right to post this article and make such claims, because they're simply not true.

The Humane Society Legislative Fund has posted a long, long list of candidates it claims support Animal Rights legislation and have voted or co-sponsored AR laws sweeping the country.

This post isn't intended to be a self - satisfied claim that I'm doing everything right and all other bloggers are doing everything wrong (even if it feels that way sometimes).

Tourism Australia does NOT claim ANY ownership rights in photos or videos that you post on our Facebook «wall» or by use of #SeeAustralia, #RestaurantAustralia and #AussieNewsToday.

Defy your friends by downloading their Super Challenge teams online to play against on your phone and post the score on your Facebook to claim bragging rights.

The person filing the complaint claimed he owned the rights to a specific piece of content posted in our forums by a member of the community.

A post on NeoGaf claims that Straight Right, the developer porting Mass Effect 3 to the Wii U, are also working a on a Square Enix game to port for early next year.

Disclose your identity or other information about you to any third party who claims that material posted by you violates their rights, including their intellectual property rights or their right to privacy.

Although The Freecycle Network does not claim ownership of content that its users post, by posting Content to any public area of the Service, you automatically grant, and you represent and warrant that you have the right to grant, to The Freecycle Network an irrevocable, perpetual, non-exclusive, fully paid, worldwide license to use, copy, perform, display, and distribute said Content and to prepare derivative works of, or incorporate into other works, said Content, and to grant and authorize sublicenses (through multiple tiers) of the foregoing.

You agree to indemnify and hold The Freecycle Network, its officers, subsidiaries, affiliates, successors, assigns, directors, officers, agents, service providers, suppliers and employees, harmless from any claim or demand, including reasonable attorney fees and court costs, made by any third party due to or arising out of Content you submit, post or make available through the Service, your use of the Service, your violation of the Terms, your breach of any of the representations and warranties herein, or your violation of any rights of another.

Re-read the quote from Prof Brulle that is in my earlier post; he's making a claim about RIGHT WING politics and saying that this is the source of «misinformation.»

By your submission you represent and warrant that you own or otherwise control all of the rights to the content that you post; that the content is accurate; that use of the content you supply does not violate this policy and will not cause injury to any person or entity; and that you will indemnify The Story of Stuff Project or its affiliates for all claims resulting from content you supply.

For example, on March 9, 2015, LaborPains.org, the joint blog of Berman front groups the Center for Union Facts and the Enterprise Freedom Action Committee, published a post encouraging Congress to pass the «Employee Rights Act,» claiming a connection with Scott Walker's signing of a bill to make Wisconsin a so - called «Right to Work» state.

Rather than say that I made a «ridiculous claim», post your AGW measurements right here.

Apple claimed the postings were unlawful under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act because they enabled circumvention of the company's digital rights management system.

First, I doubt that Blitzer even had a legal right to stop Wolfblitzzer0 from his posts; unless the posts were commercial advertising (which I doubt), Blitzer wouldn't have a right of publicity or trademark claim against Wolfblitzzer0.

As mentioned in my previous post, if you opt to file a workers» compensation claim, and are granted workers» compensation benefits, you waive your rights to sue your employer for negligence relating to your work related injury.