To do this, it encourages lawyers, scholars and others who are competent in legal analysis to contribute commentary on cases or to
post summaries of cases.
Not exact matches
(a) Every employer, employment agency, and labor organization, as the
case may be, shall
post and keep
posted in conspicuous places upon its premises where notices to employees, applicants for employment, and members are customarily
posted a notice to be prepared or approved by the Commission setting forth excerpts from or,
summaries of, the pertinent provisions
of this title and information pertinent to the filing
of a complaint.
After following the global warming saga — science and policy — for nearly a quarter century, I've seen the biases at the journals and N.S.F. (including their press releases sometimes), in the I.P.C.C.
summary process (the deep reports are mainly sloppy in some
cases; the
summary writing — read the climate - extinction section
of this
post — is where the spin lies), and sometimes in the statements and work
of individual researchers (both skeptics and «believers»).
(the deep reports are, at worst, sloppy in some
cases; the
summary writing — read the climate - extinction section
of this
post — is where the spin somtimes lies)
Today I offer this
post as a «
Summary for Policymakers» regarding my series
of seven prior blog
posts about a smear effort which took place back in 2007 that is a
case study for examining other prior and current industry corruption accusations against skeptic climate scientists.
The
case comment is by far the most ubiquitous form
of blog
post entry: the
summary of a recent
case in the blog's area
of practice, with some brief commentary on what it means.
In addition to the hearing schedules, docket information, party information,
case summaries, webcasts
of appeal hearings and factums on appeal, the Court will begin to
post memorandums
of argument on applications for leave to appeal after they are granted.
«Mainly
summaries of and commentary about recent 7th Circuit and Wisconsin
cases; also, occasional
posts about
cases making national news,
cases in other jurisdictions that may impact legal trends, and legislative developments.»
Rather than address the larger premise, simy want to note my personal opinion that, as an Internet researcher, I am thrilled that blawgers
post case summaries — they provide another source
of free legal research to mine.
Posts are
summaries of recent appellate and Supreme Court
cases.
I'm going to take exception to something Kevin O'Keefe
posted on Twitter today (based on this
post) that equated
case summary blogs as being
of little value.
For this blog's
summary of that
case see the
post: The Duty to Mitigate: Employees Not Required to Accept a «Bird in the Hand»
This is the third in a series
of posts containing
summaries of Pennsylvania
case law on the issue
of double dipping in divorce.
This is the second in a series
of posts containing
summaries of Pennsylvania
case law on the issue
of double dipping in divorce.
Posts are generally short
summaries of recent health law
cases or links to outside articles.
With respect to the issue
of what happens if the employee becomes sick or injured subsequent to the termination
of his employment, during which period
of time he ought to have had coverage under an LTD policy, see my
summary of the Brito
case in the
post The Requirement to Maintain Disability Benefits on Dismissal.
Most
posts are a
summary of recently settled
cases from around the country, especially on the East Coast.
Venkat Balasubramani just
posted a
summary of the most recent
case of the court rejecting a user contest in Duick v. Toyota,
The
post began with a legal - sounding
summary of the
case but then, within the first paragraph, delved into more vivid language including even an exclamation mark:
Matthew Nied has also
posted a more concise
summary of the
case on his site.
In
case you missed the GAO report on video news releases, here's a
summary by The Washington
Post and Google News» list
of recent reports on their use and effect.
(1) The Brennan Center
posted a good
summary of the
case and links to all
of the briefs, including the ACLU's amicus brief (supporting judges who plan to mass - solicit money directly from anyone, including the lawyers and litigants who will appear before those judges) and the ABA's amicus brief (supporting the Canon prohibiting such solicitation, whether in person or in writing).
The judgment
of Mr Justice Dingemans in the
case of R (on the application
of Sunita Sisangia) v Director
of Legal Aid Casework is here and a
summary was
posted by Doughty Street Chambers here.
My
summary of that
case can be found in my earlier
post SCC: Pregnant Women Have the Right to Refuse Unsafe Work Environments.
Recently England's most senior judge commented extensively on the concerns in a trial where an overzealous juror
posted details
of the
case, closing her
summary with the question, «Did he do it?».
However, as this blog argued in the
post Summary Judgment - Appropriate In Most But Not All Employment Law Cases, just because the subject matter of a case is employment does not mean that the case is necessarily amenable to resolution by summary ju
Summary Judgment - Appropriate In Most But Not All Employment Law
Cases, just because the subject matter
of a
case is employment does not mean that the
case is necessarily amenable to resolution by
summary ju
summary judgment.
On this point employers would be prudent to consider what the Supreme Court
of Canada said in the
case of Moore v. British Columbia (Education), 2012 SCC 61, a
summary of which can be found in the
post School District Learns Lesson in Accommodation.
Each day except Saturday there'll be a
post under the rubric Today:
Summaries Sunday will present precis of Maritime Law Book case summaries; Monday's Mix will offer half a dozen excerpts from leading Canadian law blogs; Tips Tuesday will give you a brief bit from the prior week's advice on SlawTips; Wednesday: What's Hot on CanLII continues the feature that's already in place; Thursday Thinkpiece will publish a long excerpt from a recently published book or journal article; and the Friday Fillip promises to be once again light -
Summaries Sunday will present precis
of Maritime Law Book
case summaries; Monday's Mix will offer half a dozen excerpts from leading Canadian law blogs; Tips Tuesday will give you a brief bit from the prior week's advice on SlawTips; Wednesday: What's Hot on CanLII continues the feature that's already in place; Thursday Thinkpiece will publish a long excerpt from a recently published book or journal article; and the Friday Fillip promises to be once again light -
summaries; Monday's Mix will offer half a dozen excerpts from leading Canadian law blogs; Tips Tuesday will give you a brief bit from the prior week's advice on SlawTips; Wednesday: What's Hot on CanLII continues the feature that's already in place; Thursday Thinkpiece will publish a long excerpt from a recently published book or journal article; and the Friday Fillip promises to be once again light - hearted.
For more than a decade, criminal defense attorney John Wesley Hall Jr. has
posted multiple brief daily
summaries of search - and - seizure
cases in state and federal courts.
Satisfactory completion
of the
case work
summaries and submission
of pre and
post outcome measures
Note: Following the
posting of the above
summary, NAR Legal Affairs received additional information about this
case from the General Counsel for the New Jersey Association
of REALTORS ® («NJAR»), Barry Goodman
of Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith, Ravin, Davis & Himmel, LLP.
To read an earlier
summary of the
case posted in The Letter
of the Law and a more thorough discussion
of the facts,...
I plan to present a specific
case study with hard numbers in a subsequent article but I'd like to end today's
post with a
summary of strengths that this new opportunity offers: