Sentences with phrase «post under discussion»

The post under discussion here is a prime example.

Maybe if one had read the blog posts under discussion and watched the whole thing, it would.

Not exact matches

The MCMC has said it is still under discussions with Medium to remove the offending post written by investigative news site Sarawak Report.

Threaded posts keep lines of discussion organized and collected under each team.

reality does not make up or think anything it copies others lies and repeatedly posts them often having nothing to do with the topic under discussion.

«While the discussion board itself was a bad idea, my decision to attack critics who were posting there (I did so by posting under the character «William Wallace II») was an even worse idea,» Driscoll said in his letter Friday, provided to CT. «I was wrong to respond to people the way I did, using the language I used, and I am sorry for it and remain embarrassed by it.»

well, after this post I'm not gonna continue this useless discussion under an archbishop Tutu video, but as our savvy friend Joseph here has pointed out, the NT was not meant to tell history and you are trying too hard to rewrite history.

Although BEAM SUNTORY may from time to time monitor or review discussion, chats, postings, transmissions, bulletin boards, and the like on the Site, BEAM SUNTORY is under no obligation to do so and assumes no responsibility or liability arising from the content of any such locations nor for any error, defamation, libel, slander, omission, falsehood, obscenity, pornography, profanity, danger, or inaccuracy contained in any information within such locations on the Site.

Look, I'm coming at this discussion from reading the comments under this blog post.

I saw some screen grabs recently from a discussion on LB and this horrid doula whose had a few deaths under her «care» posted that LB is being terrorised because women don't want to «take responsibility for their bodies».

Another thing: Be very leery of people on internet discussion boards who post under fake names and use pro-bodybuilders or cartoons as their avatar photos.

Under the Forum tab you also have links to the discussion threads where you will post your reflections during each module.

Although INscribe Digital may from time to time monitor or review discussions, chats, postings, transmissions, bulletin boards, and the like on the Sites, INscribe Digital is under no obligation to do so and assumes no responsibility or liability arising from the content of any such locations on the Sites nor for any error, defamation, libel, slander, omission, falsehood, obscenity, pornography, profanity, danger, or inaccuracy contained in any information within such locations on the Sites.

Print This Post Filed Under: Genre, REAL WORLD, Writing life Tagged With: gender bias, gender in writing, overcoming fear, politics, politics in writing, public discussion

Comments — Ann Miner's link to Seattle Channel interview by Nancy Pearl with Paul Collins that wandered into a Kindle discussion at about 22 minutes (iTunes podcast link); Craig Scarberry's recommendation of the excellent Books on the Nightstand podcast; Jean Remple on OCTO covers (more on covers here and here); Ann Miner with a good idea for Amazon; Marcy MacKenzie on a meetup with Bob Cope; an Amazon PR spokesman confirms the Facebook post stating that «a better way to organize your Kindle libraries» is coming; Jim Jones links to the Cushing Academy of Canada - Sony Reader style; Tom Lichty links to a charming coming - of - Kindle - age column by Margie Boulé in The Oregonian; Kevin Warner, a new Kindle owner from Down Under; Len Charnoff's tutorial video on Inkmesh; audio comments from Pastor Mark Pierce of Church Requel and Bob Lee.

Although Simply and its affiliates may from time to time monitor or review discussions, chats, postings, transmissions, and other user and member generated pages on the Sites, we are under no obligation to do so.

9.3 In the event that the World Photography Organisation may, from time to time, allow for discussions, chats, postings, transmissions, bulletin board, and the like on the Site, the World Photography Organisation is under no obligation to monitor or review such transmitted information and assumes no responsibility or liability arising from the content of any such transmitted information nor for any error, defamation, libel, slander, omission, falsehood, obscenity, pornography, profanity, danger, or inaccuracy of any such information.

The exhibition successfully incorporated well - attended affiliated events: HUB: A new series for artists and art - lovers to gather and discuss ideas, trends, and opportunities; Artist Talk & Performance by visiting artist Zachary Fabri (listed last week in Huffington Post's Black Artists: 30 Contemporary Art Makers Under 40 You Should Know); Screenings of Paul Pfeiffer's Morning After the Deluge; Constellation Walk with visiting artist Suko Presseau at 3 Porch Farm; and Panel Discussion: The Apocalypse Didn't Happen — Now What?

I do agree there's often snarking and tetchiness in the comments, sometimes from those cheerleading the basic message of the posts themselves - which is a shame, because important nuances in the posts and subsequent discussion are drowned out with this sort of debate, and genuinely curious but under - informed folk are discouraged by it.

This might be OT, but as main discussion has moved under an other post, I want to remind here, that NASA's new rover managed to land.

As it happens, we've been making the odd venture into Comment is Free discussions recently, and the funny thing is that the vast majority of our time on there has been spent fending off accusations that we are paid deniers, astroturfers, corporate sock - puppets, and that we've been posting under multiple aliases as part of an orchestrated campaign.

But surely an honest lecturer would make sure the students had access to a copy of the paper under discussion, as well as a link to the informative post by the authors here at RC?

-LSB-...] the CA post, I referred to the discussions the previous year and showed the illustration under «Carl -LSB-...]

In the CA post, I referred to the discussions the previous year and showed the illustration under «Carl Smith Assumptions» once again and once again listed those assumptions (based on the Kent diagram).

Judith no doubt will have seen this post by Tony Brown and it is likely that she will open this for discussion under a different thread.

You can also choose to «follow» other LinkedIn users who are fellow members of a Group by clicking on the «follow» button below their picture when they post in a Group discussion, or under their description in the list of Group Members.

(For a discussion of how the Fair Labor Standards Act treats nonapproved overtime, take a look at Mike Fox's post linking to this article, Top Five Employer Mistakes Under the FLSA).

Though the post generated some discussion, no one came forward with quite as vociferous an attack on the Mac than has professional marketing guru Larry Bodine in this recent article, Don't Sit Under the Apple Tree (Law Technology News — 10/16/06).

Have a look at the post Human Rights Tribunal Not The Place To Ask For Severance (http://bit.ly/1leuBBd) for a discussion of the ability to use the HRTO to claim entitlements arising under the ESA - spoiler: wrong place.

There is a fascinating discussion going on in a Legal On Ramp forum under the same title as this post.

Make intelligent comments on blog posts, have discussions that are courteous, and always have a link back to your own blog under your name.

and as long as the posting in question doesn't constitute protected discussions with your coworkers about wages and working conditions (rights that are protected under the National Labor Relations Act).»

As @Bill Gulley has posted, this was recently discussed, and you can find the link under the «Related Discussions» near the bottom of the page.