Chris O'Neill, I've recently
posted on another thread on this site the conclusions of a Workshop supported by the Australian Academy of Science and the Australian Greenhouse Office on «Pan Evaporation: an example of the detection and attribution of trends in climate variables» (22 - 23 November 2004).
Not exact matches
You
post discussions to see how many people like and comment
on the
thread.
Athiests
posting on this
thread are about as relevant as PETA supporters
posting on a «how to bake a roast»
thread.
Lauren: I read the blog you refer to when you
posted it
on the other
thread, about asking questions and not being satisfied with the answers.
Christians who are
posting on this
thread should choose their words just as wisely as if you were talking to someone in person.
Veritas tried to claim I was using the bible to prove the truth, however it is trivially easy to see that I never once
on this
thread quoted the bible
on anything he probably did nt even read my
post, it is just a stock response.
I will be
posting a reply shortly... in fact... I challenge you to a duel... I agree that if I lose I will cease to
post on this
thread.
Actually, JD, your formula applies to almost every
thread on any site; whatever the subject, the
posts come in from all directions, with little to no concern for sticking to the point of the original article...
I pointed this out
on the other
thread and it is worth repeating here in line with your excellent
post today.
I
posted a script for Notepad + +
on a different
thread.
While you're at it, can you figure out why it is that, even when a
post IS accepted, the system ends up returning the person to (i) the
post itself, (ii) the top of the page
on which s / he
posted, (iii) the top of the next page, or (iv) the top of the last page of the
thread.
I see your
posts on the Gay American Conservativce ~ GAC
threads.
I want you to know none of this was sarcastic, I'm very curious as to your toughts
on this particular matter, because maybe, being as against the original
post of this
thread as you were, YOU could be the one making a slight shift in your perspective when all's said and done.
Often done by
posting replies as new
threads, thus eliminating context or be focusing
on on a tangeant.
Look back through your
posts on this
thread, Chad..
I can make longer
posts but I just love your ravings and railings thats y I'm
on your
thread.
But Donna if you have more information that you feel I should look at, please email it or just
post it below, I am sure David has more space
on this long
thread which is proving to be a safe place for so many to tell their stories.
Anyway, of the first 574 comments
on this
thread, Julie
posted 85 of them — 15 %.
I realize there has been an awful lot of justified anger and expression
on this
thread; still, I'll risk hitting the «
post comment» button in any case.
Although by word volume this will seem more negative than my heart truly is, but as so many others more eloquently share, encourage and minister to Julie better than I ever could, I will leave the great 500
posts on this
thread supporting Julie to speak for themselves.
I read through all the
postings on this
thread and checked back as the list grew.
If you read through the comment
thread on this
post you will get a taste of the length with which people have gone to protect the Emergent brand and do harm to Julie.
I've also been keeping up
on this
thread as best I can, and I just last night
posted an article about some issues I see with Emergent.
I
posted this link
on another
thread some time back, but I'll
post it again, because it's relevant:: http://nakedpastor.com/2010/11/cartoon-some-light-reading.
(I'll stop
posting on this
thread, now.)
I'll leave a comment
on this
thread with a link to my
post on my blog.
I did
post some articles
on the Mormon
threads I think but it wasnt from the New York Times.
Over the past couple days
on this
thread, dozens and dozens of posters have made essentiaally the same
post — often word - for - word identicle — that Obama is a Muslim and wears a ring inscribed in Arabic that says «There is no god but allah».
Would love to continue this into the evening but, no way in heck am I going to respond /
post to this
thread on my PDA late into the night.
All this brings us back to some of the earlier
posts on this
thread: Instead of memorizing biblical verses and studying theological arguments, shut off the noise in your mind, and just listen.
«And if I have chosen the wrong God, even though there is only one then its my eternity not yours» You are quite right but remember you started this
post thread, not us, you were the first to make a comment
on how the godless would spend eternity.
There were days of hating of Christians
post on that
thread.
This crazy
posts was suppose to be
on another
thread but it got put here when I hit the
post button.
Allow me to pick out one common
thread among the various
posts today
on this topic: Dr. Moore isn't much interested in whether he's actually an evangelical or not, pointing out that its meaning is largely contextualized.
Here's my latest list — this seems like a good spot to set this down, as nobody's
posting much
on this
thread... ---- bad letter combinations / words to avoid if you want to
post that wonderful argument: Many, if not most are buried within other words, but I am not shooting for the perfect list, so use your imagination and add any words I have missed as a comment (no one has done this yet)-- I found some but forgot to write them down.
Your need to hijack the point of this
post and talk over everyone
on the
thread is why the point continues to be relevant.
I'm an engineer, I design and build things that help you live well enough to
post on internet
threads.
We have a picture of crazed hitler in the middle of the page and much of the
posting on this comment
thread are extremely hat.e.ful so actually the comment section is a very accurate portrayal of an ugly divisiveness that is part of our culture..
I'm officially done here with this
posting on this
thread.
Here's a comment from the
thread below
on my
post on the last FRIDAY NIGHT LIGHTS.
I'm not going to fill my
posts with sweetness and light when I can sure as hell bet that my views would be dismissed (and have been dismissed, see the recent debacle
on the «toasted gay»
thread) as prejudiced and ordered out of court, a priori, in an instant.
There was a
post on one of these
threads that went into the US Economy and world markets.
Going back to what started this most recent topic
on this
thread, the opinion
on Proposition 8 from the shameless conservative which Daniel
posted, I have to say that I think this guy is playing word games.
To answer your question, I disagree with some of what you wrote here, but rather than express that, in this instance I felt it better to share Paul's thoughts
on some of the topics in your
post and in the comments /
thread as I thought that would be more helpful and more fruitful than my thoughts.
If the answer's already been
posted, then you'll have no trouble
posting it again, or cutting and pasting it, or giving the page number and
thread on which that was done.
Funny how those who consider themselves of superior intelligence to me
on this
thread seem to only be able to
post ad hom.
Take look at the time stamps
on posts in this
thread.
From what I understand, when a OP
post is deleted, the answering replies
on that
thread all drop down to the last page of the article.
Possibly the most disingenuous and illogical
post ever — and that's saying something,
on these
threads.
I think I have
posted on this
thread enough myself.