I do nt like the door handles though... I did not know how to describe them until
a poster in this thread called them toilet paper fixtures... and BINGO!
Sorry, but your so called questions are irrelevant as everything put here in this post is based on the writings of Victoria Strauss herself (which is in posts above or found in the links posted above) and the facts presented by other
posters in the thread.
More details in
the poster in this thread yet we are doing nail trims — cats / dogs / exotics, dog washes and ear cleanings for $ 10
The original
poster in this thread on Flyertalk has reported on a conversation she had with a British Airways Executive Club representative who confirmed that «R» coded Business Class fares will no longer earn tier points or Avios with immediate effect.
I see
no poster in this thread has proven anything wrong with those algebraic proof steps especially original poster Robert Brown.
A few
posters in this thread make the claim «I am a scientist yet I am sceptical about AGW (Anthropogenic Global Warming).»
There are a lot of
posters in this thread I respect.
Not exact matches
That was another
poster in the same
thread.
Yet
in other
threads this
poster insists there are no gods, including Cernunos so yeah it's just an excuse.
Over the past couple days on this
thread, dozens and dozens of
posters have made essentiaally the same post — often word - for - word identicle — that Obama is a Muslim and wears a ring inscribed
in Arabic that says «There is no god but allah».
I was reading the
thread here, and happened to notice as the other
posters began to dismantle your arguments with their strongly supported assertions, you, as most often «believers» tend to do, began to get less and less specific, and... began to skate past their points, while bringing
in more and more «fluffy» scriptural references.
And for a bit of nostalgia, anybody remember the
thread on MDC a couple of years ago where the midwife covered the
poster's vagina with warm towels to help her cope with her mother's c - section
in some weird ritual
in the woods?
One of our fellow
posters mentioned the plot
thread where our protagonist finds himself
in bed with an almost impossibly nubile Elisha Cuthbert.
Daniel Day - Lewis and Paul Thomas Anderson reunite
in the trailer and
poster for Phantom
Thread, a look at fashion
in 1950s London.
It's always a shame when people take the mickey with IPs, but at least Xela / Badumtish / whoever actually had some points to make (unlike some of the
posters in our God of War 3 review
thread, for instance).
And speaking of unanswered questions, Victoria Strauss still hasn't answered those posed here about I) the psychiatric medications prescribed to her (as she implies about other
posters) II) or what her journalism training is since her own quote
in this
thread says that to do a job effectively they need job training and experience.
We reported earlier on a 4Chan discussion
thread in which the original
poster claimed that Samsung showed off the Galaxy Nexus at his place of work.
• Four -
poster bed with silky high -
thread - count Egyptian cotton linens and romantic voile draping • A walk -
in closet / dressing room • iPod docking station • Complimentary internet access (either WiFi or hard wired) • Large flat screen screen TV & DVD player • Private bar • Tea and coffee making facilities • In - room safe • Signature bathroom amenities • Large bathroom with Victorian - style claw foot bath and enormous walk - in shower • Over-sized plunge pool and private patio • Personalized butler servi
in closet / dressing room • iPod docking station • Complimentary internet access (either WiFi or hard wired) • Large flat screen screen TV & DVD player • Private bar • Tea and coffee making facilities •
In - room safe • Signature bathroom amenities • Large bathroom with Victorian - style claw foot bath and enormous walk - in shower • Over-sized plunge pool and private patio • Personalized butler servi
In - room safe • Signature bathroom amenities • Large bathroom with Victorian - style claw foot bath and enormous walk -
in shower • Over-sized plunge pool and private patio • Personalized butler servi
in shower • Over-sized plunge pool and private patio • Personalized butler service
In a recent project, Hunting for Pheasants, currently on view at Tufts University Art Gallery, Medford, MA, Tomaszewski created a series of fictional film
posters based on famous assassinations and installed them within a space negotiated by
threading through a knee - high maze.
There was a recent report, I think Hank may even have directed a
poster to this earlier
in another
thread in regards to the «Head
in the Clouds» sidebar item.
The comments here vary only slightly from WUWT and
in fact the author of the post at the top of this
thread actually solicited
posters from WUWT to come here.
I simply can't think of any sensible way to define SAW as «temperature minus AGW» that could be reconciled with either my
poster or what I've said so far
in this
thread.
So far no one has proposed a serious objection to that calculation —
in fact when I first gave it on this
thread back
in week 1 Steven Mosher said he found it reassuring and that I should have given it on the
poster.
With regard to the appropriateness of the Hofmann law and my fit of it to the Keeling curve, I commented on Dec. 5, the second day of this
thread, here where I said Embarrassingly I discussed the
poster with Pieter Tans, one of the coauthors of the Hofmann et al result cited
in the
poster, for ten minutes without recognizing his name until he pointed it out.
There are a number of faults
in the
poster that this
thread has drawn attention to; a rewrite that addressed the main concerns would be an improvement.
To summarize, my previous many responses
in this
thread to Mike J's objections to my
poster would seem to undermine his claim that I've been ignoring them.
I do continue to enjoy and find interest
in those too few
threads that involve analysis of published papers relating to climate science — such as we obtain from Nic Lewis — and to those general analyses of an area of climate science when well researched and presented by
poster.
New
poster bender has written some very thoughtful posts, including some comments on Gaspé which I I'd like to recover from deep
in a political
thread.
But ironically, that only reinforces the main theme that I post on: (1) political ideology is largely determinative
in how people align themselves
in the climate debate and, (2) being that most
posters at Climate Etc. are on the «skeptical» side of the debate, this site is solid evidence that rudeness and closed - mindedness (as represented by accusations of trollhood and
thread - jacking) is equally well - represented on both sides of the climate debate.
I heartily recommend it to any
poster interested
in the topic of this
thread.
Posters Tim and Robert Brown's isothermal solution ignores these authors and / or have offered nothing of substance
in this
thread to disprove these published «PhD physicists on issues of fundamental thermodynamics».
Constant repetition of this mantra
in every
thread became an irritation and I believe he was one of the few
posters to be banned on CA because of this nonsense.
Many of my fellow
posters really do need to study physics, math and consult engineers about the many problems not being addressed
in this
thread at all.
I agree with you (and another
poster IIRC on an earlier
thread) that the energy cost of end use systems has to be accounted for
in some manner, especially when comparing energy alternatives (i.e. liquid fuel or solid fuel, electricity and so on).
The veterans have seen and participated
in all the arguments, and when they see an argument raised (such as Stephen Schneider) that they think has been argued to death, and where the
poster appears to be opposed to their point of view, they tend to be quick to assume that the
poster is aware of this fact and is just trying to be irritating, as if his post had been the last post of a
thread in which all viewpoints on that topic had already been expressed and thoroughly explored.
I've run across three
posters now who claim Steve is violating confidentiality, two of them on this
thread where contrary evidence is clearly written
in plain English.
The one another
poster posted
in this same
thread is a perfect example.