I find that the level of awareness, intelligence, cognitive ability and scientific background of readers and
posters on sites such as «that» is poorly lacking in critical analytical skills.
Not exact matches
Having only been to this
site a couple of times in the past, I'm not aware of the moderation policy but am surprised to see
such accusations
as accusing someone of «cognitive dissonance / deceit» (based,
as far
as I can see,
on the
poster's own interpretation of someone else's words) being allowed.
Now
as everyone knows
on this
site we support the Pro-Competitive use of the DDF to wipe out Zoocasa, ComFREE, mere
posters and
such.