Length
of postintervention follow - up: Varied — 1.0 month - 27.2 months (Mean = 12.5 months, Standard Deviation = 6.6 months).
Limitations include the lack of a control group at the 6 -
month postintervention follow - up, small sample size, concerns about the generalizability to other populations due to the largely college educated, married, above average income sample and the use of self - referred families, who may be more willing to complete self - directed work than others.
Results indicate that intervention parents, reported changes in parents» awareness and regulation of emotion and emotion socialization practices and this resulted in reduced youth somatic complaints compared to the control group
at postintervention follow - up (see length below).
Conclusions based on
postintervention assessments may be insufficient to draw firm conclusions about the effectiveness of parenting interventions.
The frequency of correct responses to individual questions on the preintervention and
postintervention questionnaire was compared using χ2 (or Fisher exact test when expected frequencies were small).
No change was noted in reported satisfaction of breastfeeding mothers being seen by residents: 91 % reported being «satisfied» or «very satisfied» in both the preintervention and
postintervention groups.
They were also taken at one -
year postintervention for a subgroup of 70 intervention group participants.
For example, regarding maternal depressive symptoms, data analysis included 22 studies
for postintervention, 13 for short - term and 7 for long - term follow - up.
The median (midpoint) door - to - needle time for tPA administration for the preintervention period was 77 minutes, which decreased to 67 minutes for the entire
postintervention period.
To the best of our knowledge, there are no studies exploring the effects of foam rolling on increasing extensibility in a dynamic position, and none that examine whether a prolonged FR intervention will allow for greater gains in hip extension or if improvements will be maintained 1 -
week postintervention.
To measure whether the effects of the program persisted, the children who had been sampled for the first
postintervention test were tested again in November 2007, one year after the program ended.
The number of visits was not adequate to allow for paired preintervention and
postintervention comparisons of individual residents when seeing breastfed infants and their mothers.
Results indicate women receiving IPT had significantly fewer depressive symptoms
postintervention when compared to individuals in the ECS group, and these gains were retained and increased at the follow - up assessment.
Each of the 9 desired behaviors was assessed as being present or absent on the preintervention and
postintervention telephone surveys.
Estimating that 10 % of residents preintervention would perform an acceptable number of desired behaviors and 50 % of
residents postintervention would perform an acceptable number of desired behaviors, and using a 2 - tailed α of 0.05 and power of 0.80, a minimum of 19 phone interviews was needed before and after the intervention.
A composite knowledge score, representing the percent correct of 21 knowledge questions, was calculated; preintervention and
postintervention composite knowledge scores for each individual were compared using the paired t test.
Nested qualitative interviews will be
conducted postintervention to explore the acceptability of the intervention and identify any areas in need of improvement.
But, «contrary to expectations» (p. 718), the researchers found no differences between the teachers»
postintervention ratings of children in the intervention and control groups.
A pre-intervention and
postintervention measure showed that students with clinically significant hyperactivity and behavioral difficulties scores were the most sensitive to the Coping Power Program intervention.
Results indicated that rates of sexual and nonsexual behavior were significantly
lower postintervention for the MST treatment group.
Results at
postintervention demonstrate that compared with children in the delayed condition, children who received Bounce Back immediately demonstrated significantly greater improvements in parent - and child - reported posttraumatic stress and child - reported anxiety symptoms.
Limitations include a
limited postintervention follow - up, no control group, high dropout rate for study participants, and minimal ethnic representation among Asians and Native Americans.
Those mothers changed the
most postintervention, compared with control group mothers with the highest levels of aversive verbal behavior.
Results indicated that highly significant positive changes were noted between pre - and
postintervention assessments on all attitudinal and behavioral factors, parental attitudes, and children's social and emotional competence.
We included randomised controlled trials of parenting interventions reporting child development or parent — child relationship outcomes
at postintervention or follow - up.
Limitations include the lack of a control group at the 3 - month and 2 -
year postintervention follow - ups and the small sample size for a study involving three groups.
The purpose of this study was to determine whether foam rolling the anterior thigh can increase the range of motion in hip extension in a dynamic lunge position and if these changes will remain 1 -
week postintervention.
We find that, despite the large gap in average peer achievement (1.6 standard deviations in baseline test scores) between the top and bottom classes, the students just below the cutoff have
postintervention test scores similar to students just above the cutoff.
In addition, for KEEP parents, placement stability significantly increased between baseline and
postintervention when compared to the comparison group.
Results indicate that TINT parents, but not control parents, reported significant improvements in parents» internalizing difficulties and reductions in parents» difficulties with emotion awareness and regulation at
postintervention follow - up (length noted below).
The mean composite knowledge score was 69 % preintervention, and 80 %
postintervention; the mean % difference was 11 % with a standard deviation of 8.95 (t = 8.7; df: 47; P <.001).
The questionnaire administered after the intervention was identical to the one administered before the intervention, except that demographic information was omitted on
the postintervention questionnaire, and questions about changes in confidence were added.
The frequency of each behavior performed by the preintervention group was compared with that of
the postintervention group using χ2 (or Fisher exact test when expected frequencies were small).