Sentences with phrase «posts on belief»

One of the best posts on belief blog as it relates to scientific discoveries and its theological relevance.

An article on atheism was posted on a belief blog... so what part of why atheists are posting here don't you get?

I am amazed that this posting on Belief Blog has gotten so many responses, compared to it's other postings.

Just ones that post on belief blogs with names like «In doG We Trust» or «dyslexic SaNTA».

You said «The reality is that Atheists post on a Belief Blog because it is a place to challenge the conceptions of Religion which we feel are a detriment to human society by proporting magical thinking»

Why do Atheists waste one precious second of your short lives posting on a Belief Blog?

There are others who post on the Belief blog who are neither atheist or Christian as well.

There are others who post on the Belief Blog who are a part of the LGBT community.

Just curious... why is a non-believer reading and posting on a belief blog?

Despite your wariness of Pielke Jr, you will enjoy his recent post on belief, http://rogerpielkejr.blogspot.com/2010/09/it-is-not-about-science-but-values.html, which has a lot about belief systems determining one's attitude to AGW, and does not spare the rod from the libertarians.

Not exact matches

Badlands National Park posted several facts about climate change on its official Twitter account Tuesday afternoon, sharing statistics that might contradict the beliefs of President Donald Trump's new administration.

For those who don't know, a round - up post is when you propose a single topic then reach out to multiple people to weigh in on their opinions, answers, thoughts or beliefs.

Now in its ninth season, this year's marketing push centers around the new Santa Project, a social media call to arms asking consumers nationwide to post Santa belief - related photos, messages or videos on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram or YouTube under #SantaProject.

Even knowledge of the «hard» sciences advances over time; a unified theory of the investment world is similarly beyond our grasp — as is a full understanding of any one strategy, no matter the current pile of historical evidence.the research puzzle For more thoughts on the topic, see this posting on «decaying beliefs.»

Well, yeah... and I mean if what someone is really trying to achieve with this is to reduce practices that in any way, shape or form could indicate that someone bears them or their faith ill will... I don't think publicly humiliating people who would take the time to look up your dead ancestor's name and then take the time to drive to a temple and then get immersed in water on their behalf so that they (by their belief) have the option to accept your religion post mortem is really misguided and contrary to the spirit of freedom of religion in what it advocates.

In one response you have referred to me as silly, accused me of being unable to reconcile my beliefs to scripture, accused me of stalling, rambling on and on, (love the irony in this one... grin), likened me to a tween, insinuated I do not know or rightly divide scripture, referred to me as sensitive, and implied my post was immature.

As long as no one forces you or anyone else to ride in separate buses or post on separate discussion boards you have no moral or other right to force those willing to ride separate buses and post on separate discussion boards to follow YOUR beliefs.

How ironic that you'd post a semi-public comment on the Internet telling people that their belief system should be a private affair.

@ «Hindu...» you have posted enough garbage on this Belief board.

This person is obviously suffering from mental illness and yet this irrational respect that is given to «religious faith» blinds CNN to the point where they post this as «Belief» instead of on the medical page where it belongs.

Look at all of the negative post on here bashing peoples beliefs.

The CNN Belief Blog is filled with pro-religious posts, which, IMO have no place on a news website.

I find inspiration in the courage that Christians exhibit when they post on this blog, knowing they are going to be abused for their belief.

Anyways... good luck to you on this «belief blog» as it can get very «tense» from time to time in postings.

Nice post and well eloquented amongst the the trolls and zealots on both sides of the belief spectrum.

thanks for all of your replies I have to go to lunch now (i do try to occasionally post on here on CNN Belief Blog; i enjoy discussing this stuff with everyone; good to have discussion without having to be put in prison).

If you intend to demonstrate how stupid you are on every comment section on Belief Net then you should at least have the courage to post your name.

And as we look through this endless list of post we as christian are labeled as dimwitted, uneducated and shoving our beliefs down your throats, but yet I read from most of you speak more hate then any christian I have seen post on here.

Everytime religious people post something about God or something out of their belief, there comes the Atheists storming it with their typical (hateful, profane, disrespectful but in - fairness articulate, itellect, scientific and logical) replies and name callings such as; «2000 years religious numbnuts», «oxymorons who keep asking of sky daddy's help», «idiots who was fooled by a magical being in the sky» and so on and so forth.

the claims of some of you on this post in saying Mormons are not Christian, I ask you to define or clarify what makes a person a christian, if it is a belief in Jesus Christ that he is the only way people can be saved, then Mormons are Christians.

I've read this story and many of you guys posts over the past few months on the Beliefs stories and keep hearing these same statements when discussing Christians: «pushed» and «shoved down our throats».

I did a little playing around on google one day and found that some guy claims he made a bot that autoposts anytime someone uses the phrase «Athiesm...» posts «prayer changes things» on the belief blogs.

I did a little playing around on google one day and found that some guy claims he made a bot that autoposts anytime «Athiesm...» posts «prayer changes things» on the belief blogs.

I'm not going to place my trust in a grown man posting as «Magic Panties» on a blog dedicated to faith and belief.

The incredibly far - fetched postings here by the self - proclaimed religious folks are likely causing far more Americans to question their «faith» and beliefs» than anything we atheists could do on our own.

So, when posting on a «faith and belief» blog, the onus is on me to prove to a skeptical internet atheist that God exists?

Unless David exercises his right as originator / facilitator of this blog and blocks my posts, I have as much right to express my beliefs and speculations on this blog as anyone else.

Even if 2 or 3 skeptics who spend a lot of time posting on a «faith and belief» blog don't agree, guess what?

He isn't posting his belief he pointing out that it is the belief of the Hobby Lobby CEOs on how the morning after pill works.

God's proof exists if faith, not the scientific testing that the internet atheists posting on a faith and belief blog demand.

I would say though that if you are not going to challenge someone on their beliefs directly then maybe leave their name out of the start of your post?

Personallly, I love posting the same comment on every article in the belief blog.

When Jerry DeWitt converted to Atheism and it was posted as an article here on the Belief Blog, the Faithful said the same thing you said in wondering who this guy was and why was it news worthy.

ps There is a huge effect when CNN decide, who knows how, to post a Belief Blog article on the main CNN page.

I hadn't realised till I read your post today how many assumptions I have about the crucifixion story that hang on a belief that Jesus could have stopped his own abuse.

The post is so full of historical inaccuracies, theological problems, and contradictions that it's hard to know where to start, but I want to make clear from the get - go that my response to this post should not be seen as an attack on Tim Challies himself, (who I respect and like), but rather a response to the general belief that God's presence is limited to the pages of Scripture and that all forms of contemplative or experiential spirituality should therefore be dismissed out of hand or regarded with suspicion.

On the Belief Blog, repeat posts, even those that were previously censored and not displayed, will show a message stating that you posted it before.

What would you call a grown man (50 + years in age if you have grown children) who sits on a belief blog everyday making mama jokes and posting hateful messages about religion?

In a recent question - and - answer segment with John Piper posted on desiringgod.com, Piper spoke about his beliefs on women teaching in seminary and, relatedly, being pastors themselves.

Just do some basic research and you will see that the moderate calm muslim posts on this site are not the belief of hundreds of millions of muslims in the world.