Not exact matches
Iv» e been reading Bsall
postings and they all have a lot of passion for educating children which is what education is supposed to be about... My personal 2cents worth is this - In social science there is very little that can meet the level of scientifically verifiable
causation and we therefor shouldn't be making decisions that impact childrens lives based
on faulty science.
This
post is already too long but, for the sake of completeness, since I've suggested there's a significant problem in the judge's use of «substantial», I'll add a bit more, including a reference to the case that once wasn't quite every Canadian (common law side) judge and civil litigator's favourite case
on many aspects of proof of
causation and damages.
I will still
post about important
causation issues
on Slaw, but those
posts will will be shorter and punchier (all implications intended).
It'll be longer than the summary I've
posted here, but shorter than my monograph
on causation issues which you can find elsewhere
on the web under the short title «Scraping the Surface».