I do not have evidence that this is the case (other than past
posts on this thread which I have read), but if somebody, or some people, are stuffing the ballot boxes with Labour postal votes it is not at all surprising that the Labour majority should be inflated.
In fact, can you point me to just one of
your postings on this thread which discusses the topic from a scientific perspective?
Not exact matches
While you're at it, can you figure out why it is that, even when a
post IS accepted, the system ends up returning the person to (i) the
post itself, (ii) the top of the page
on which s / he
posted, (iii) the top of the next page, or (iv) the top of the last page of the
thread.
But Donna if you have more information that you feel I should look at, please email it or just
post it below, I am sure David has more space
on this long
thread which is proving to be a safe place for so many to tell their stories.
If you read through the comment
thread on this
post you will get a taste of the length with
which people have gone to protect the Emergent brand and do harm to Julie.
Going back to what started this most recent topic
on this
thread, the opinion
on Proposition 8 from the shameless conservative
which Daniel
posted, I have to say that I think this guy is playing word games.
If the answer's already been
posted, then you'll have no trouble
posting it again, or cutting and pasting it, or giving the page number and
thread on which that was done.
Ken actually asked me to list some of his lies (
which I did
on a previous
thread but I doubt he has now read them) Hope you are reading this
post KEN.
Further to your
post criticizing my forceful language (using the word» braindead») and my reply to you, I note that you too,
on this very
thread also call the board «fossil aged», with
which I very much agree.
I
posted the Wisconsin neonatal mortality statistics in a comment
thread on a Newsweek article about midwifery
which quoted Prown, asking why she did not mention that homebirth midwives in Wisconsin had triple the neonatal death rate of low risk hospital birth.
[Response: We had an long, long, extensive
thread on climate effects of contrails in one of the other recent
posts (can't remember
which).
These include Joe Wright's Darkest Hour,
which portrays Winston Churchill scheming in darkened chambers during the same Battle of Dunkirk that Nolan depicts; Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri,
which features a scorched - earth performance by Frances McDormand as a mother grappling with her daughter's murder; Phantom
Thread, director Paul Thomas Anderson's largely unseen drama about a 1950s fashion designer played by Daniel Day - Lewis, in his final performance
on screen; and The
Post,
which is directed by Steven Spielberg and stars Tom Hanks and Meryl Streep as Washington
Post editor Ben Bradlee and publisher Kay Graham during the battle to print the Pentagon Papers.
The Shape of Water, Universal's Get Out and Lady Bird were joined
on the Best Picture list by Sony Classics» Call Me By Your Name; Focus Features» Darkest Hour, home to Best Actor frontrunner Gary Oldman, nommed today; Warner Bros» Dunkirk, with Christopher Nolan's stunning war movie scoring eight noms; Focus» Phantom
Thread, with Daniel Day - Lewis back in the Actor race; Fox's The
Post, along with it the 21st nomination for Meryl Streep (though not for director Stephen Spielberg); and Searchlight's Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri, probably the other frontrunner coming into today noms and
which had seven nominations, with Martin McDonagh nominated for writing but not directing, and the film's big three — Frances McDormand, Woody Harrelson and Sam Rockwell — all nominated.
There is also the Kindle Fire «Wi - Fi won't connect»
thread on the official Amazon support forum,
which at time of this
posting already has 100 + messages
on it... not good for a product that has only been in the hands of consumers for about 24 hours.
Sorry, but your so called questions are irrelevant as everything put here in this
post is based
on the writings of Victoria Strauss herself (
which is in
posts above or found in the links
posted above) and the facts presented by other posters in the
thread.
I just
posted a short comment with similar numbers (including some extrapolations
on pages / borrow read)
on the
thread at Kboards,
which will probably get shredded by all the Chicken Littles over there
I am not sure
which one would be preferable though, as I understand from previous
posts on this
thread, the yield is after MER.
Provided you have the authority, you may either be asked to give a statement,
which one of the MSE Team will
post on your behalf, or be given permission to
post directly
on the specific
thread.
In the past the Forum Team has had to deal with
posts and
threads which at best stand
on the borderline of bad taste, and at worst charge headlong into issues of racism, immigration and xenophobia.
I did follow the link regarding vaccines, and found the
posts are old, but added my thoughts to that
thread as well — the Wikipedia page
on feline vaccines is interesting food for thought, including the various WSAVA (World Small Animal Veterinary Association) recommendations,
which seem to support our concerns.
I've had some of these details for a while, but I started writing this
post because of an interesting
thread on FlyerTalk in
which Citi asked only a few questions — and they were largely focused
on how other banks treat the complicated issue of credit card sign - up bonuses.
Your friends here
on the PlayStation Home Community Management team donned our own assassin's
threads over the weekend and managed to snag some images,
which we've
posted below for your convenience.
If you follow along with our Upcoming Games Forum,
which you totally should if you care about being
on the cutting edge of what's coming out for mobile, then you may have seen a
thread that was
posted late last month for a game from developer Sozap called Armed Heist.
The petition (
which I urge you to sign if you haven't yet) has reached an unprecedented 63,372 signatures at the time of
posting, and the forum
thread currently stands at the most active
on the Namco - Bandai forums.
The info was in Japanese,
which was then translated into English and
posted on a Reddit
thread.
Another pointer to a journalist's weblog (that commends this particular Realclimate
thread) quoted from Benny Peiser today: ---- Quote It's an odd day when I find myself agreeing with Benny Peiser
on a climate change question, but his
post Thursday to his CCNet list, in
which he blasted media of coverage of the Nature paper
on possible changes in the thermohaline circulation, seems
on point.
I've
posted an extract over at the open
thread of a rather cogent article
on UVA and GMU
which I hope will appear today (never mind the provocative blogsite name)
which as I suspected associates recent presidential shenanigans with Mike Mann: http://daskrap.com/2012/8/why-thomas-jeffersons-university-killing-climate-science
You know, I wonder if the denialists
on this
thread such as Matt, Dodo or Steve Reynolds would care to comment
on the following topic (
which actually relate to the original topic of the
post):
> 230 To elaborate
on the link I
posted — this is one of the editors of Reason Magazine, who has changed his mind about warming; the
thread below his
posting includes comments from some people who read only his
posting, some who read the press release, and one or two who actually read the science
on which he based his change of mind.
Inline # 34 — Gavin,
on my previous
postings in the http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2008/09/how-much-will-sea-level-rise/
thread (
which you may have missed) I explained how I saw your referenced article as not dealing with the most critical question raised by the Hansen paper as I see it — I actually asked the same question then in # 18.
(Although, given that your first
post in this
thread told Gavin that you «would point out a flaw in his logic», with no caveats or maybes,
on a subject often discussed here,
on which Gavin is certainly a high expert, I'm not sure what you mean when you say «tenor».)
As a result,
on Saturday morning, I
posted the above
thread, in
which I asked questions about the authenticity of Gavin's commitment to «welcoming serious discussion and rebuttal» `?
After the
posting on Gray's paper was spotted, several students sought me out to say that they wanted to change their vote, they though i needed to keep
posting and particularly with regards to the Gray
thread (
which I decided not to do, actually)
As a simple exercise, I quickly revisited the everchanging Hansen adjustments, a topic commented
on acidly by E.M. Smith (Chiefio) in many
posts — also see his interesting comments in the
thread at a guest
post at Anthony «s, a
post which revisited the race between 1934 and 1998 — an issue first raised at Climate -LSB-...]
I have
posted you numerous links
on previous periods of Arctic warming - the last just a couple of weeks ago
on a
thread at WUWT
on which you were active.
Here's my response to that worry (
which I
posted at the end of an inactive
thread here a year ago, and
on WUWT a few days ago).
One of the properties is that prediction as such is beyond our present capabilities — and the best approach may be the probability prognostication approach of Tim Palmer — a summary of
which I have
posted elsewhere
on this
thread.
Rather than argue about little rhetorical points and taking down someone else's article or points, I prefer to clarify the big picture issues,
which is why I did this
post rather than continue the argumentation about mainly rhetorical points
on the previous two
threads.
New poster bender has written some very thoughtful
posts, including some comments
on Gaspé
which I I'd like to recover from deep in a political
thread.
The
threads on which you
post are always interesting and informative.
The admirable intent of your original
post on this
thread has been entirely high jacked by did so / did not, he said / she said, and the usual ad hominems
which outside academia are termed slurs and name calling.
I do feel we are getting away from the main point of this
thread which was to comment
on Kates
post.
A Note
on Threading There is only one way to break the threading on Climate Etc, and that is to post a comment so vile and / or abusive that Judith Curry, or her students, are forced to remove it by hand (which breaks the th
Threading There is only one way to break the
threading on Climate Etc, and that is to post a comment so vile and / or abusive that Judith Curry, or her students, are forced to remove it by hand (which breaks the th
threading on Climate Etc, and that is to
post a comment so vile and / or abusive that Judith Curry, or her students, are forced to remove it by hand (
which breaks the
threadingthreading).
Finally, commenting at Skeptical Science works best if you first limit the scope of your comment to that of the
thread on which you
post your comment and then follow up
on those
threads to see what respondents have said in response to you.
(This is a cop of my
post on thread # 1 — did not see the newer one — makes more sense here) The «casting «of this book is very interesting: introduction by a novel writer and a former member of IPCC's Bureau; 15 authors of
which half selected as CLA, LA or reviewer of IPCC's AR5; of
which 4 or 5 as review editors.
I even
posted a citation
which shows this,
on this very
thread.
The veterans have seen and participated in all the arguments, and when they see an argument raised (such as Stephen Schneider) that they think has been argued to death, and where the poster appears to be opposed to their point of view, they tend to be quick to assume that the poster is aware of this fact and is just trying to be irritating, as if his
post had been the last
post of a
thread in
which all viewpoints
on that topic had already been expressed and thoroughly explored.
My
post was completely
on topic as it related to the interpretation of one of the «ClimateGate» emails, the Guardian's coverage of
which is the
thread topic.
I
posted this clip
on Bishop Hill
which is running a
thread that observes that the US has ursurped the EU's role as the «global village «fool.
In a message
on the bitcoin development email
thread, Paul Sztorc
posted links for two proposed Bitcoin Improvement Protocols (BIPs), both of
which were dated Nov. 17, in an effort to begin getting feedback
on the code developed thus far.