Not exact matches
The formation and properties of the aerosol
cloud that sits above the monsoon are a major unknown
in climate science, and their
potential future
changes represent one of the largest uncertainties
in climate predictions.
The more innovative studies (e.g., [13,14]-RRB- try to tackle the many
potential confounding factors
clouding the signal of selection, such as demographic effects (i.e.,
changes in population size and the influence of migration).
The
Cloud has offered significant
potential in changing how education as an industry works from with the perspective of offering online programs so as to modify the traditional working ecosystem.
Secondly, if the
potential cloud response is related to
changes in circulation caused by the TSI or an ozone related
change, then it isn't an extra forcing at all — it is part of the feedback, and should already be incorporated
in models.
Thus it appears that, provided further satellite
cloud data confirms the cosmic ray flux low
cloud seeding hypothesis, and no other factors were involved over the past 150 years (e.g., variability of other
cloud layers) then there is a
potential for solar activity induced
changes in cloudiness and irradiance to account for a significant part of the global warming experienced during the 20th century, with the possible exception of the last two decades.
Critics of this result might argue that the solar forcing
in these experiments is only based on the estimated
change in total irradiance, which might be an underestimate, or that does not include
potential indirect amplifying effects (via an ozone response to UV
changes, or galactic cosmic rays affecting
clouds).
There's a long history of assertions that
clouds can be a substantial driver of climate
change, distinct from their clear
potential to amplify or blunt (depending on the type of
cloud) a
change set
in motion by some other force.
While it is difficult to reason through what any
change to the equations would actually result
in terms of radiation balance given all the nonlinearities, use of entropy
potential temperature would tend to cooler upper troposphere and altered water vapor and
clouds.
That's because of feedbacks
in the climate system, such as Arctic ice melt and
changes to
cloud cover, as well as the
potential melting of ice sheets.
Another
potential contributor to amplified warming that's investigated is
changes in cloud cover.
There are dozens of
potential reasons;
changes in clouds being my favorite.
«We are off to a great start collecting a timely and unique dataset to help better understand the
potential influence of
clouds on the Arctic climate as sea ice conditions
change,» said William Smith, ARISE principal investigator at NASA's Langley Research Center
in Hampton, Virginia.
So a process - oriented analysis of low -
cloud variations
in the present climate has the
potential to lead to improvements
in the representation of the low -
cloud response to climate
changes in models.
The IPCC acknowledges three
potential drivers of climate
change: (1)
changes in incoming solar radiation (e.g. due to
changes in the Earth's orbit or the Sun); (2)
changes in reflected solar radiation (e.g. due to
changes in low - level
cloud cover); and (3)
changes in outgoing longwave radiation (e.g. due to
changes in greenhouse gas concentrations).
Due to the relative weakness of Earth's geomagnetic shielding
in this region,
cloud changes over such a location are tantalizing as FD events have the
potential to induce maximum
changes in atmospheric ionization.
The
potential for
changes in cloud cover as a result of the
changes in sea ice makes the evaluation of the actual forcing that may be realized quite uncertain, since such
changes could overwhelm the forcing caused by the sea - ice loss itself, if the cloudi - ness increases
in the summertime.