Not exact matches
BHP stuck to its position that the costs and risks of collapsing its «
dual -
listed company» structure currently outweighed the
potential benefits.
Whilst I disagree with the rebate scheme that this organization advertises as a means to attract
dual agency «customer» (vs. «client», as they describe it) business for one of the reasons that Alan M alludes to below (
potential misrepresentation vis a vis the seller - buyer «must transact» the sale - purchase simultaneously) wherein their advertising above it states that «If a seller
lists their home with the RedPin.com and at the same time «engages» them to buy a new home,...» (the key word being «engages», which means to sign a BRA), it will nevertheless be interesting to observe for how long this salaried method of remunerating their sales people will last.
any
potential for
listing brokers to act as disclosed
dual agents, e.g. buyer / tenant agents.
The
potential purchaser and seller entered an agreement, with the
listing broker acting as
dual agent in the transaction.
any
potential for the buyer / tenant representative to act as a disclosed
dual agent, e.g.
listing broker, subagent, landlord's agent, etc., and
It is only the «
listing» Realtor who must watch his / her «p's» and «q's» when describing said
listing to a
potential buyer under
dual agency circumstances.