In looking at
potential global warming solutions, it is important to consider how big a role they can play, how fast they can be implemented, how affordable they are, and what impact they have on the environment.
Not exact matches
«We're doing this research for commonsense reasons — as a
potential solution to the challenges posed by the exhaustion of fossil fuels and
global warming,» says Hiroaki Suzuki of JAXA's Advanced Mission Research Center, one of about 180 scientists at major Japanese research institutes working on the scheme.
It is useful to have a thread in which the discussion of
potential solutions to
global warming can be discussed without straying off topic.
Also, as mentioned before, it's vital to understand each Congressperson's (and each person running for Congress's) views regarding
global warming and
potential solutions.
A task force of the Ministry calculated that thanks to these alternative
solutions, 120 million tons of CO2 - equivalent (a figure for
global warming potential measuring how much of a certain greenhouse gas contributes to the greenhouse effect) was eliminated in 2010.
When the YPCCC asked Americans, «Should schools teach our children about the causes, consequences, and
potential solutions to
global warming?»
But here's another possibility: Chris Mooney writes up an interesting new study suggesting that many people first tend to think about
potential solutions to
global warming and then work backward to assess the problem itself.
One
potential solution to combat
global warming that some scientists are proposing is spraying aerosols into the atmosphere to deflect the sun's rays, which is also known as Solar Radiation Management.
While an expanded RGGI can not serve as a direct compliance option for the Massachusetts
Global Warming Solutions Act in and of itself, there is great
potential for it to help Massachusetts meets its carbon dioxide reduction mandate.
Yet, unless the ethical and justice issues raised by climate change are seriously considered by nations when they formulate their international emissions reductions commitments under the UNFCCC, the international community is not likely to find a
global solution to prevent
potential enormous damages from human - induced
warming (See, On The Practical Need To Examine Climate Change Policy Issues Through An Ethical Lens)
In order to avoid a baseless belief in any
potential cause of
global warming, the real scientists must be able to express an applicable and easily understandable
solution to politicians for decision - making.
what Americans understand about how the climate system works, and the causes, impacts, and
potential solutions to
global warming.
The Montreal Protocol has a lot more to offer than a model for addressing
global warming emissions, it is itself an important tool that urgently needs to be strengthened to harvest the «low hanging fruit» of phasing out hydrofluorocarbons (and HCFCs), the high
global warming potential ODS alternatives with genuinely climate friendly natural refrigerant
solutions.
These include auto - off lighting combined with the use of LED lights; energy efficient low - E glass used in glass door refrigerators; more efficient cooling compressors; more advanced microprocessor temperature control and defrost sensors; more efficient high - capacity air circulation systems, as well as hot gas defrost
solutions; and low
global warming potential, energy efficient alternative refrigerant options.
Understanding the Earth's climate and the
potential of
global warming has stopped being a scientific curiosity to me and has become a serious topic because the
solutions being proposed would be detrimental to my family's life.
Even despite public controversies over the inclusion of climate change in state science standards, «Americans overwhelmingly support teaching our children about the causes, consequences, and
potential solutions to
global warming — in all 50 states and 3,000 + counties across the nation, including Republican and Democratic strongholds,» according to the Yale Program on Climate Change Communication (April 11, 2018).
This is bound to ruffle a few feathers, so here are Professor Jacobson's comments on how he came to this conclusions: Jacobson Considered a Wide Range of Environmental Impacts Jacobson says he has conducted to first quantitative, scientific evaluation of the proposed, major, energy - related
solutions by assessing not only their
potential for delivering energy for electricity and vehicles, but also their impacts on
global warming, human health, energy security, water supply, space requirements, wildlife, water pollution, reliability and sustainability.
In all 50 states, Americans overwhelmingly support teaching our children about the causes, consequences, and
potential solutions to
global warming.
The Dismissive, however, say that they have thought some about
global warming and believe they are wellinformed about the causes, consequences, and
potential solutions — i.e., that there are none, because it doesn't exist (Figures 6 & 7).
Jacobson has conducted the first quantitative, scientific evaluation of the proposed, major, energy - related
solutions by assessing not only their
potential for delivering energy for electricity and vehicles, but also their impacts on
global warming, human health, energy security, water supply, space requirements, wildlife, water pollution, reliability and sustainability.
Since their task is to generate
potential threats and
solutions to
global warming... That is exactly what they do.