Columbia University Professor Wally Broecker has recently published a thoughtful opinion piece (open access) on the judiciousness and
potential of air capture geoengineering in the new journal Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene.
Not exact matches
We do have a range
of negative emissions technologies, BECCS, soil sequestration
of carbon, direct
air capture, forests, biochar and others A combination
of all
of them would have
potential to solve the problem.
EOR has the
potential to aid in the development
of CDR approaches like biomass power generation with carbon
capture and storage (BECCS) and direct
air capture (DAC).
The public money will fund projects exploring the real - world
potential of «negative emissions» technologies (NETs), including soil carbon management, afforestation, bioenergy with carbon
capture and storage (BECCS), enhanced weathering and direct
capture of methane from the
air.
CDRMIP experiments are designed to address questions concerning CDR - induced climate «reversibility», the response
of the Earth system to direct atmospheric CO2 removal (direct
air capture and storage), and the CDR
potential of proposed schemes such as afforestation / reforestation and ocean alkalinization.