Not exact matches
Other research in
political psychology suggests that the no campaign has had a much easier job — those inclined to
political conservatism are more likely to have a «negativity
bias» in their response to environmental stimuli — conservatives have more of a physiological reaction to
potential threats in the environment and subsequently devote more psychological resources towards dealing with them: conservatives, quite literately, see more things that could go wrong than liberals.
Still, Mr. Brafman added, «in today's climate, defendants facing
political corruption charges must be concerned about
potential juror
bias that may be based more on perception than fact.»
This book provides new insights into the nature of
political bias with regards to evidence and critically considers what an «improved» use of evidence would look like from a policymaking perspective.Part I describes the great
potential for evidence to help achieve social goals, as well as the challenges raised by the
political nature of policymaking.
This point is just as true of climate science, as it is of psychology,
political science, or any field that has
potential to be distorted by
political bias.
Why it is important to know who did this research is because we can better remove the
potential bias due to financial or
political gain.
(2) thou shalt not fudge the data (3) thou shalt not invent arbitrary statistical methods to suit thy data (4) thou shalt not indulge in any form of
bias e.g. thou shalt not employ incomplete, highly selective, subjective literature reviews (6) in the interests of transparency and replication thou shalt not hide the data or code (7) thou shalt not make vague or exaggerated statements unsupported by evidence (8) thou shalt not tolerate actual or
potential conflicts of interest (9) thou shalt not allow
political interference to compromise scientific integrity (10) thou shalt not use unvalidated computer models (11) Thy university shall insulate undergraduate fees from research expenses and require research to be self supporting independent of the teaching.
(2) thou shalt not fudge the data (3) thou shalt not invent arbitrary statistical methods to suit thy data (4) thou shalt not indulge in any form of
bias e.g. thou shalt not employ incomplete, highly selective, subjective literature reviews (5) thou shalt not exaggerate (6) in the interests of transparency and replication thou shalt not hide the data or code (7) thou shalt not make vague statements unsupported by evidence (8) thou shalt not tolerate actual or
potential conflicts of interest (9) thou shalt not allow
political interference to compromise scientific integrity (10) thou shalt not use unvalidated computer models