Not exact matches
Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in such forward - looking statements and that should be considered in evaluating our outlook include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) our ability to continue to grow our business and execute our growth strategy, including the timing, execution, and profitability of new and maturing programs; 2) our ability to perform our obligations under our new and maturing commercial, business aircraft, and military development programs, and the related recurring production; 3) our ability to accurately estimate and manage performance, cost, and revenue under our contracts, including our ability to achieve certain cost reductions with respect to the B787 program; 4) margin pressures and the
potential for additional forward losses
on new and maturing programs; 5) our ability to accommodate, and the cost of accommodating, announced increases in the build rates of certain aircraft; 6) the effect
on aircraft demand and build rates of changing customer preferences for business aircraft, including the effect of global economic conditions
on the business aircraft market and expanding conflicts or political unrest in the Middle East or Asia; 7) customer cancellations or deferrals as a result of global economic uncertainty or otherwise; 8) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which we operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; 9) the success and timely execution of key milestones such as the receipt of necessary regulatory approvals, including our ability to obtain in a timely fashion any required regulatory or other third party approvals for the consummation of our announced acquisition of Asco, and customer adherence to their announced schedules; 10) our ability to successfully negotiate, or re-negotiate, future pricing under our supply agreements with Boeing and our other customers; 11) our ability to enter into profitable supply arrangements with additional customers; 12) the ability of all parties to satisfy their performance requirements under existing supply contracts with our two major customers, Boeing and Airbus, and other customers, and the risk of nonpayment by such customers; 13) any adverse impact
on Boeing's and Airbus» production of aircraft resulting from cancellations, deferrals, or reduced orders by their customers or from labor disputes, domestic or international hostilities, or acts of terrorism; 14) any adverse impact
on the demand for air travel or our operations from the outbreak of diseases or epidemic or pandemic outbreaks; 15) our ability to avoid or recover from cyber-based or other security attacks, information technology failures, or other disruptions; 16)
returns on pension plan assets and the impact of future discount rate changes
on pension obligations; 17) our ability to borrow additional
funds or refinance debt, including our ability to obtain the debt to finance the purchase price for our announced acquisition of Asco
on favorable terms or at all; 18) competition from commercial aerospace original equipment manufacturers and other aerostructures suppliers; 19) the effect of governmental laws, such as U.S. export control laws and U.S. and foreign anti-bribery laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and environmental laws and agency regulations, both in the U.S. and abroad; 20) the effect of changes in tax law, such as the effect of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted
on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such changes; 21) any reduction in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence
on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other governments
on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment of interest
on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to
potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other things.
Sang Lee Founder,
Return on Change
Return on Change is an online -
funding platform that connects socially - innovative startups with
potential investors.
To offset the significant risk they face when
funding unproven startups, investors often start with a simplistic expectation that they should have the
potential to see a
return on their investment equal to 10 times what they put up.
When investors begin to focus
on the
potential for Fed rate hikes, short - term bonds will almost certainly begin to experience lower
returns and — depending
on the type of
fund — greater volatility than they have in years past.
They entail significant risks that can include losses due to leveraging or other speculative investment practices, lack of liquidity, volatility of
returns, restrictions
on transferring interests in a
fund,
potential lack of diversification, absence and / or delay of information regarding valuations and pricing, complex tax structures and delays in tax reporting, less regulation and higher fees than mutual
funds.
About Social Venture Connexion SVX (@theSVX) is a full service impact investing platform that connects impact ventures and
funds with accredited investors looking to make investments with demonstrable social and / or environmental impact and the
potential for financial
return, from nonprofit education projects to health ventures focused
on early cancer detection.
Potential annuity purchasers become more exposed to longevity risk the lower the
returns they earn
on their assets (your capital is more likely to run out if you aren't earning enough interest to
fund your retirement).
This lending platform basically matches borrowers and lenders such that borrowers get their loans
funded at usually much cheaper rates (vs traditional lenders such as banks and credit card companies) while lenders (also called investors) earn a rate of
return on the money they lend with the
potential to beat investment
returns from other avenues.
Also plotted is the downside
return relative to cash or money - market, since while these
funds have held up fairly well
on absolute terms,
on relative terms the
potential for under - performance is quite clear.
By automatically reinvesting dividends, investors purchase additional
fund shares
on a regular basis, which over time has the
potential to lead to higher future
returns.
A regular IRA,
on the other hand, offers the
potential to earn much higher
returns because you can invest those
funds in stocks, bonds, mutual
funds, and more.
When you assess
fund performance, consider the effects of risk
on potential return.
Whether you're investing
on your own or working with a financial advisor, our TD Exchange - Traded
Funds (TD ETFs) can help you lower costs and increase your
return potential.
the lowest
potential yield that can be received
on a bond without the issuer actually defaulting; calculated by making worst - case scenario assumptions
on the issue by calculating the
returns that would be received if any in - whole mandatory redemptive provisions are exercised by the issuer; partial redemptive provisions (such as sinking
funds) are not included in yield to worst calculations; the yield to worst metric is used to evaluate the worst - case scenario for yield to help investors manage risks and ensure that specific income requirements will still be met even in the worst scenarios
Derivatives instruments can be highly volatile, result in leverage (which can increase both the risk and
return potential of the
Fund), and involve risks in addition to the risks of the underlying instrument
on which the derivative is based, such as counterparty, correlation and liquidity risk.
The Examples assume: (1) you invest $ 10,000 in the noted class of Units in the noted Investment Portfolio for the time periods indicated; (2) your investment has a 5 %
return each year; (3) the Investment Portfolio's operating expenses remain the same (including the operating expenses of the Underlying
Fund (s)-RRB-; (4) all Units redeemed, if any as noted, are used to pay Qualified Higher Education Expenses (the table does not consider the impact of any
potential state or federal taxes
on the redemption); (5) you pay the applicable maximum Initial Sales Charge
on Class A Units and any CDSC applicable to Units invested for the applicable periods in Class C Units; and (6) for the Class C Units Example, the Class C Units converted to Class A Units at the end of sixth year and were thereafter subject to the costs associated with Class A Units.
Some of the important things that the
fund looks out for are companies with decent growth
potential and good
return on capital employed (ROCE).
In addition, interest rates have probably bottomed out in North America, which should bode well for Sun Life, as it can earn a better
return on the
funds it has to set aside for
potential claims.
Potential annuity purchasers become more exposed to longevity risk the lower the
returns they earn
on their assets (your capital is more likely to run out if you aren't earning enough interest to
fund your retirement).
Seeking opportunities through mortgage - backed securitiesBroad securitized opportunities: The
fund invests in mortgage sectors, including agency MBS and CMOs, and non-agency RMBS and CMBS, and ABS.Higher
potential returns: By investing in mortgage - backed bonds, the
fund can offer the
potential for higher
returns than an investment strategy focused only
on agency MBS.Leading research: The
fund's portfolio managers use proprietary models to assist in the evaluation of mortgage - backed bonds and to manage the
fund's interest - rate risk.
While both types of
funds seek to deliver
potential returns, understanding the difference between them will help an investor decide
on his / her asset allocation.
Given the thousands of actively managed mutual
funds that exist, there is the
potential for extreme
returns based
on random chance alone.
The growth of software - based asset management firms that help individuals minimize fee expenses, such as FeeX, don't even bother projecting
potential returns for actively managed
funds, instead pointing out to consumers how much money they can save
on fees by investing in low - cost index
funds.
the lowest
potential yield that can be received
on a bond without the issuer actually defaulting; calculated by calculating the
returns that would be received if provisions, including prepayment, call or sinking
fund, are used by the issuer
What impact can an investment totalling less than 1 % of investable
funds have
on the portfolio unless it has the
potential for a 10 fold
return?
They would have insisted
on knowing just how the borrowed
funds were going to be spent (invested to create a
return that, in turn, would be used to repay the loan), asked for a business forecast, looked to mitigate
potential non-payment with collateral or somehow insinuated themselves into the spending process with checks and balances.
Why do I even bother... but it hardly needs pointing out we're talking about stocks whose business is inherently low / steady growth — can these muppets not figure out that high CAGRs obviously come from a constant diet of investment & acquisitions (regardless of the
potential returns on offer), all
funded by serial equity & debt issuance.
The premium for Attorney Fee Insurance is often fully contingent upon success, but typically costs less than one third of the
return charged by litigation
funders, which is a key differential that attorneys need to be aware of when advising their clients
on potential litigation finance options.
The
potential returns on ULIPs are lower since the ULIPs fall is a member of low risk products unlike a mutual
fund product.