An approach to providing such an independent assessment was proposed half a century ago by Arthur Kantrowitz when experts were disagreeing publicly over
the potential safety of nuclear power — «Proposal for an Institution for Scientific Judgment», Science, 156 (1967) 763 - 4.
Not exact matches
But critics question the
safety of nuclear power, citing such concerns as the
potential for catastrophic meltdowns, their
potential vulnerability to terrorists, the lack
of workable evacuation plans in the event
of accidents as well as the problem
of dealing with radioactive waste.
Often I encounter people who oppose
nuclear power but refuse to listen to any description
of its
potential benefits or learn about its
safety record or how it works because they've decided that all
of the science
of nuclear power and radiation protection is false, that
nuclear energy is bad and that's it.