In flood - prone locations, flush toilets back up and pit latrines overflow contaminating the environment and
potentially drinking water supplies — with dire consequences to the public health through water - borne diseases like cholera.
Not exact matches
However, the presence of any
potentially disease - causing organisms in
drinking water supplies is of concern, particularly to upstate communities that receive
water from that part of the Catskill / Delaware system that has not been treated by the City's UV disinfection facility in Westchester County.
The proposal came the same week the state Senate released a report revealing the discovery of «
potentially dangerous contaminants» in the
water supply in Newburgh, Orange County, and as the village of Hoosick Falls weighs a legal settlement with a private company over carcinogenic chemicals in their
drinking water.
Opposition to fracking has arisen mostly out of fear that the technique could
potentially contaminate
drinking water supplies.
On the
drinking -
water front, researchers from IBM, Central Glass, Ltd., of Japan, the King Abdul Aziz City for Science and Technology (KACST) in Saudi Arabia, and the University of Texas at Austin are developing a new type of membrane that is resistant to damage by chlorine (the chemical most often used prevent bacterial growth in
water supplies) and designed to filter out salts and harmful toxins in
water such as arsenic (long - term exposure of which has been linked to cancer and other ailments)
potentially creating new sources of
drinking water.
Don't forget that choosing organic also helps to protect the environment from chemical fertilizer and pesticide pollution that can harm ecosystems, disrupt soil microbiology, and
potentially even contaminate your own
drinking water supply.
Which forms the basis for the IPCC claim of high climate sensitivity (mean value of 3.2 C), resulting in significant global warming (up to 6.4 C warming by 2100), «extreme high sea levels», increased «heat waves», increased «heavy rains» and floods, increased «droughts», increased «intense tropical cyclones» — which, in turn, lead to crop failures, disappearance of glaciers now
supplying drinking water to millions, increased vector borne diseases, etc. (for short,
potentially catastrophic AGW — or «CAGW»).
If the oil industry wants to pipe these dangerous tar sands oils over our
water sheds and aquifers, putting our
drinking supply and neighborhoods at risk, they should not only be required to pay into the cleanup fund, they should be paying far more than the 8 cents per barrel they pay for conventional oil since these tar sands oils are not just worse for the environment, but
potentially pose a greater risk of spills and are even harder to clean up.