When it's time to examine the impacts of
poverty on student achievement, the conservative (whose parents paid for college) works alongside the woman from the trailer park.
«If one school can overcome the pervasive effect of
poverty on student achievement, shouldn't any school be able to do the same?»
Researchers Craig Howley, of Ohio University and the Appalachia Educational Laboratory, and Robert Bickel, of Marshall University, set out to find out whether smaller schools could reduce the negative effects of
poverty on student achievement.
Like the Howley and Bickel studies linking small schools to reducing the impact of
poverty on student achievement, the Chicago study also found the connection.
The separate studies credit small schools with reducing the negative effects of
poverty on student achievement, reducing student violence, increasing parent involvement, and making students feel accountable for their behavior and grades.
Not exact matches
Depending
on how many
students at a given school live in
poverty, strong parental networks have a favorable or inhibiting effect
on the academic
achievements of their children.
Evidence
on the
achievement effects of desegregation by income is limited by both an absence of detailed information
on family income (including indicators for severe
poverty or high income) and the difficulty in separating the effects of
students» own circumstances from the influences of peers.
As our schools serve greater numbers of Hispanic
students and fewer whites, for example, we should expect
achievement to decline somewhat because Hispanic
students, who are more likely to live in
poverty, tend to perform at lower levels,
on average, than whites.
In high -
poverty schools, we estimate that the overall effect of all teacher turnover
on student achievement is 0.08 of a standard deviation in math and 0.05 of a standard deviation in reading.
The federal role in education has been a growth industry since at least the Johnson administration, when the Elementary and Secondary School Act (ESEA, now the Every
Student Succeeds Act, ESSA) was passed as a part of the War
on Poverty, with a focus
on closing the
achievement gap and equalizing funding between the rich and the poor.
Rothstein continually asks whether schooling is the most effective way to elevate
students from
poverty and launch them
on a road to higher academic
achievement.
It is thus quite ironic that 21st - century references to Coleman regularly claim that he showed the major impact
poverty had
on student achievement.
If reducing
poverty and lifting
student achievement are the goals, dollars would be better allocated by cutting the taxes
on earned income paid by two - parent, working families with children.
He suggests that schools can have only a limited influence
on closing the
achievement gap between
students who live in
poverty and their more affluent peers unless school improvement is combined with broader social and economic reforms.
As educators, in order to be responsive to the needs of our
students, it is helpful to consider the constraints that
poverty often places
on people's lives, particularly children's, and how such conditions influence learning and academic
achievement.
The suit filed in state Supreme Court in Albany by the STA and about 30 city teachers, and supported by New York State United Teachers, argues SED did not properly account for the devastating effects of
student poverty on achievement when it set growth scores
on state tests in grades 4 - 8 math and English Language Arts.
Students in KIPP schools may be surrounded by classmates who are,
on the whole, more supportive of academic
achievement than peers in traditional public schools with similar
poverty rates.
Focus Areas: «
Student Social - Emotional Challenges» «Children in
Poverty Are Children At Risk» «The Impact of Equity
on Student Achievement»
These studies showing the direct positive effects of raising household income — even by small amounts —
on student achievement make it plain that reducing
poverty through stable, living wage jobs for all working families would also help improve educational outcomes.
The strategy is becoming all too clear — ignore
poverty, blame the effects of
poverty on teachers, maintain the public perception of failing teachers and schools with an A-F formula that is designed to rank order
students so that the bottom 33 percent will always exist (no matter how much
achievement gains are made), use it to designate teachers and schools with low grades, then create a red herring for an impatient public by offering a placebo known as charter schools and school choice to appease them.
Why: School and district level collaborative partnerships result in improved
student achievement, minimizing the impact of
poverty on student learners and decreasing teacher turnover.
NASSP recognizes that successful schools, particularly schools serving large numbers of high -
poverty students and
students of color, have placed an emphasis
on literacy instruction and
achievement (NASSP, 2005).
«Given the strong influence of
poverty on student academic
achievement, these changes have increased the challenge of improving
student outcomes in IPS,» the report read, promising a plan to cultivate schools capable of erasing the
achievement gap associated with inner city schools where high levels of
poverty and greater racial diversity exist.
This implies that
poverty has an enormous impact
on student achievement.
The effects of
poverty on children matter in regard to
student achievement.
Bright Futures USA, a new non-profit organization started by Missouri's Joplin Public Schools, plans to tackle
poverty's stranglehold
on student achievement across the U.S.
The Capital Area Region and the Utica Area Region collected data that provided indicators of success and impact
on student achievement using the Instructional Strategies from Engaging
Students with
Poverty in Mind after offering distance learning workshop from the Teaching is the Core Grant.
Although
poverty can never be an excuse for lack of
achievement, neither can its effects
on student learning be ignored....
As a result of this type of support from Congress, state legislatures, and philanthropic organizations, a steadily increasing number of principals will be affected by compensation systems that offer additional compensation based
on student achievement, professional knowledge and skills, and service in high -
poverty and other hard - to - staff schools.
We did the same thing at the school level, to be certain that we ruled out school - level factors that might have impacted instruction and hence,
achievement, such as proportion
students of color, school size,
poverty level, and how well
students had done
on the assessments the prior year.
Despite growing
poverty, my great elementary school consistently scores well
on standardized measures of
achievement and surveys of
student, community, and teacher satisfaction.
This goes for all races, but the trend is that many of the
students with families living in
poverty drop out of high school, or are just not getting the right education needed and end up
on the lowest part of the
achievement gap.
This implies that high -
poverty schools are,
on average, much less effective than lower -
poverty schools, and suggests that strategies that reduce the differential exposure of black, Hispanic, and white
students to poor classmates may lead to meaningful reductions in academic
achievement gaps.
Despite high levels of
poverty in their communities, these schools have sustained improvements
on multiple measures of
student success (
achievement test scores, graduation rates, attendance rates, and behavior measures); and national and state organizations have recognized and honored them for their
achievements.
Middle - class schools are 22 times as likely to be high performing as high -
poverty schools, in part because disadvantaged
students face extra obstacles, but in part because economic segregation has an independent, negative effect
on student achievement.
Dr. Montecel's address,» Framing Systems Change for
Student Success,» was part of a panel
on the most promising strategies to improving
achievement in high
poverty schools.
Ryan J. Smith is executive director of The Education Trust — West, a research and advocacy organization focused
on educational justice and the high academic
achievement of all California
students, particularly those of color and living in
poverty.
Fiske and Ladd argue that North Carolina's letter grades fail to account for the impact that
poverty has
on academic
achievement, and that wrap - around services, like summer enrichment programs and health clinics, are critical to seeing broad - scale improvement in
students» learning gains.
A high -
poverty, previously low - performing elementary school in Maine shifted its from looking mainly at
achievement and test scores to focusing
on ways to create motivated, confident, engaged
students.
Other education stories rich in data visualization that come to mind include the Tampa Bay Times» Failure Factories series, the WBEZ / Southtown Daily Star series
on poverty and
student achievement.
Organized by the Community Coalition, the groups presented a comprehensive, data - driven «
Student Need Index» that uses environmental, social and academic factors known to impact student achievement — such as poverty and violence — to produce a district - wide ranking of schools based o
Student Need Index» that uses environmental, social and academic factors known to impact
student achievement — such as poverty and violence — to produce a district - wide ranking of schools based o
student achievement — such as
poverty and violence — to produce a district - wide ranking of schools based
on need.
Table 3: Percentage of New York City
Students Failing to Meet Proficiency
on Achievement Exams by Test and
Poverty Decile, 2000 and 2005
The report found that «a more positive school climate is related to improved academic
achievement, beyond the expected level of
achievement based
on student and school socioeconomic status backgrounds,» and can mitigate the negative effects of
poverty on academic
achievement.
Now when we talk about education in Oregon, we talk about focusing
on strategies for closing the
achievement gaps, the graduation gaps and the opportunity gaps that disproportionately affect underserved
students of color, English Language Learners (ELL), LGBTQ2 +
students,
students living in
poverty,
students with disabilities, first - generation post-secondary
students and
students in foster care.
However, the connections manifested at lower levels than other critical factors influencing teachers» decisions to remain in a school, including the percentage of teachers
on emergency credentials,
student poverty levels, school size, and school designation levels for
student achievement.
Parsing the data
on student achievement in high -
poverty schools.
Demographics are not destiny in
student achievement, according to an expert who spoke at NSBA's pre-conference session
on Friday called «Disrupting
Poverty: Turning High -
Poverty Schools into High - Performing Schools.»
The current system, with its heavy focus
on student achievement scores, results in predictable patterns linked to
poverty rather than the contributions of schools.
Much like the federal Equity and Excellence Commission, we approached our challenge by taking a broad view of the evidence
on what can move the needle
on student achievement, particularly for
students living in
poverty.
Educational outcomes are shaped by many factors, but research shows that teacher quality is the most important in - school factor influencing
student achievement.59 Of course, other out - of - school factors, which are often caused by
poverty, can also influence
student outcomes.60 Because teacher quality has been shown to have a measurable impact
on standardized test scores, some academics have started trying to directly measure the impact of Act 10
on student outcomes by examining how
students fared
on standardized tests after its passage.