In the Youngstown City Schools, a high -
poverty school district serving about 5,000 students in northeastern Ohio, our students face significant challenges.
Not exact matches
Paid meals: Meals that meet the nutritional requirements of the National
School Lunch or School Breakfast Program and are served to children with household income above 185 percent of the poverty line at a price set by the school district or school food p
School Lunch or
School Breakfast Program and are served to children with household income above 185 percent of the poverty line at a price set by the school district or school food p
School Breakfast Program and are
served to children with household income above 185 percent of the
poverty line at a price set by the
school district or school food p
school district or
school food p
school food program
The Community Eligibility Program (CEP) is a meal service option for
schools and
school districts in low - income areas — allowing the nation's highest
poverty schools and
districts to
serve breakfast and lunch at no cost to all enrolled students without the burden of collecting household applications.
The state should adopt the Executive Budget's formula improvements that better address
poverty and
district need, while also taking steps to ensure that students receive additional resources — especially in
schools that
serve low - income students and students of color.
«An ideal situation in five years may be in a leadership role at a large urban
school district, charter
school network, or nonprofit organization that
serves underrepresented students, especially those living in
poverty,» she says.
These objectives are particularly important for
schools and
districts serving large concentrations of students living in
poverty.
JOHN B. KING JR: Unfortunately, the history here is that in many
school districts, we see that there are
schools serving high - needs students where even the entire student population is in
poverty, and they're actually spending 25 to 30 percent less than a
school 10 blocks away that
serves largely affluent students.
Congress adopted Title I in 1965 to ensure that
districts and
schools serving large concentrations of students in
poverty received a greater portion of federal funds to address the compounded impact of
poverty on student learning.
The
district schools still enroll a majority of Newark children, including a higher percentage of those living in extreme
poverty or with learning disabilities, but now they're less equipped to
serve them.
Many high -
poverty districts are unable to meaningfully integrate their
schools because the students they
serve are either entirely low - income or entirely high - income.
For one, there is a case to be made that
districts, particularly those
serving a lot of students living in concentrated
poverty, need additional funds to encourage effective teachers to work in more challenging
schools.
Had the board voted to surrender control over the
schools, all of which
serve predominately black and Hispanic student populations in high -
poverty neighborhoods, the
district could have received a two - year reprieve from state sanctions.
Mark recently
served three years as president of the city - wide PTA in Albany, which is a small
district with a high
poverty rate, and more charter
schools per capita than any other
district in the state.
The Anne Arundel County
school district serves half as many students as Montgomery County — around 80,000 in total — but has similar levels of
poverty.
Average
district per - pupil spending does not always capture staffing and funding inequities.14 Many
districts do not consider actual teacher salaries when budgeting for and reporting each
school's expenditures, and the highest -
poverty schools are often staffed by less - experienced teachers who typically earn lower salaries.15 Because educator salaries are, by far,
schools» largest budget item,
schools serving the poorest children end up spending much less on what matters most for their students» learning.
In both
districts,
schools serving the most affluent students received tens of thousands of dollars in additional funding each year from parents, while the highest -
poverty schools received very little, if anything, from their PTAs.
One concern is that
districts receiving the minimum amount, such as KPS, which
serves high -
poverty neighborhoods, won't get the resources they need for the challenges they face, and that smaller, lower - funded charter and cyber
schools will receive more than they need.
On average, the federal government contributes about 10 percent to the total amount spent on public education, but these dollars account for a larger portion of many high -
poverty districts» budgets.11 For example, Los Angeles Unified
School District and Chicago Public
Schools — both high -
poverty districts — receive about 15 percent of their budgets from the Education Department.12 These dollars
serve essential purposes, such as supplementing services for low - income students, defraying the cost of individualized education programs for students with disabilities, and compensating for a loss of property tax due to federally owned land.
Great Public
Schools Now, the outside group seeking to expand the number of LA Unified schools serving students in high - poverty neighborhoods, has released a list of district schools — most of them charters — that represents «the kinds of schools» the organization intends to replicate in the years
Schools Now, the outside group seeking to expand the number of LA Unified
schools serving students in high - poverty neighborhoods, has released a list of district schools — most of them charters — that represents «the kinds of schools» the organization intends to replicate in the years
schools serving students in high -
poverty neighborhoods, has released a list of
district schools — most of them charters — that represents «the kinds of schools» the organization intends to replicate in the years
schools — most of them charters — that represents «the kinds of
schools» the organization intends to replicate in the years
schools» the organization intends to replicate in the years ahead.
He has published numerous articles, chapters, and books on these topics, for example
serving as lead author of Transforming Teaching in Math and Science: How
Schools and
Districts Can Support Change (Teachers College Press, 2003) and as editor of Standards - Based Reform and the
Poverty Gap: Lessons for No Child Left Behind (Brookings Institution Press, 2007).
School districts that
serve high -
poverty students, and rural
districts would be given priority for the grants.
Our high
school serves approximately 300 students from all Wards in Washington D.C., but with a high population (85 %) of students from Wards 7 and 8, traditionally underserved and high
poverty communities in the
District.
The Southern
Poverty Law Center accused some of the
schools of shunning or kicking out the hardest to
serve students and filed a lawsuit against the
district, which eventually resulted in a consent decree requiring stepped - up oversight.
While
serving as middle
school principal, his
school received visitors from all over the state to learn how one of the lowest funded
districts in Ohio was also one of the highest performing, despite
poverty and limited resources.
Also, the link is punitive to teachers who work in
schools that
serve high -
poverty communities, and would provoke an exodus of minority and experienced teachers from urban
districts.
In terms of achievement, charter
schools do not
serve similar proportions of students living in
poverty, bilingual children, and children with disabilities when compared to the local
districts where they are located.
Finally, if, as in many
districts, novice teachers are concentrated in
schools serving low - achieving students and students in
poverty, then a seniority - based layoff approach will disproportionately affect the students in those
schools.