Your African American students are three times likelier to live in
poverty than your white students, are more than twice as likely to get into fights at school, and almost twice as likely to be chronically tardy to class.
In your district, African American students are three times more likely to live in
poverty than white students and more than twice as likely to get into fights at school.
Not exact matches
He writes, «In the University of Michigan undergraduate case, Gratz v. Bollinger, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, joined by Justices David H. Souter and Stephen Breyer, supported affirmative action with data finding that African - American and Hispanic
students have higher
poverty rates
than white students (22.1 percent and 21.2 percent compared with 7.5 percent), and that black and Latino
students «are all too often educated in
poverty - stricken and underperforming institutions.»»
After two years of interviewing more
than 100 black, Latino, and
white undergraduates at an elite university, Jack came up with a new way to think about how factors like
poverty and socioeconomic segregation — segregation by class — shape the way
students experience college.
Nationwide, on average, black
students are four times more likely to live below the
poverty line and 30 percent less likely to have a college - educated mother
than white students.
When African Americans in Minnesota (as elsewhere) are significantly more likely
than white students to be growing up in
poverty, to be living in single - parent families, to be coming into school with all manner of disadvantages?
For instance, black and Latino
students are five times more likely to attend high -
poverty schools
than white students.44 Recent census data also show that black and Hispanic Americans live in
poverty at more
than twice the rate of non-Hispanic whites, and they are significantly much more likely to live in extreme
poverty.45
Low - income black and Latino
students are far more likely to attend schools of concentrated
poverty than low - income
white students.
For example, a study last fall of 500 Pennsylvania districts found that at any given
poverty level, districts with the most
white students get substantially more funding
than districts with more minority
students.
This implies that high -
poverty schools are, on average, much less effective
than lower -
poverty schools, and suggests that strategies that reduce the differential exposure of black, Hispanic, and
white students to poor classmates may lead to meaningful reductions in academic achievement gaps.
Emmanuel: With all of this, the original idea was that these measures would only be needed temporarily, but that was assuming policies would work in concert — that policies aimed at reducing housing segregation would have worked, and we wouldn't see that black and Hispanic
students are still much more likely to attend high
poverty schools
than their
white peers.
For example, black and Hispanic
students — even if they are not poor — are much more likely
than white or Asian
students to be in high -
poverty schools.
Coleman's arguments lamenting
students of color score worse on the tests
than their
white peers — without acknowledging the ways in which systematic underfunding of schools,
poverty, and institutional racism have disfigured our school system — end up pathologizing communities of color rather
than supporting them.
Meanwhile, 8th grade reading scores were even worse — with 8th graders in 2015 also performing no better overall
than in 2000, but with the gap between Black and
White students remaining unchanged in that time and the gap between
students in
poverty and
students not in
poverty growing from 13 points to 23 points.