The arbitration (decision - making)
power of the parenting coordinator is limited to disputes about carrying out the parenting plan and other minor parenting issues.
Not exact matches
Therefore, it has created four new and distinct categories
of family advocates, with very specific statutory
powers: a Child & Family Investigator, a
Parenting Coordinator, a Decision - Maker and an Arbitrator.
One
of the distinguishing features
of Parent Coordination is that the
Parenting Coordinator «PC» is often given some decision making
power by the court.
In addition, the flexibility
of a childcare right
of first refusal will give a
parenting coordinator unwarranted opportunity to churn time and fees, and an inappropriate amount
of power to pass judgment on and meddle with
parents» lives and personal decision - making, as well as with the timeshare arrangement itself.]
Depending on the vagaries
of the practice from time to time in this or that jurisdiction,
parenting coordinators effectively have license to wield heavy authority and extremely biased
power, opining back to and influencing judges, bringing issues into the public domain that do not belong there and which were not brought into the case by either party, siding with one party unfairly (even developing personal relationships with one
of the parties), and recommending or just ordering the
parents to hire the
parenting coordinator's own cronies for therapies and guardianships and evaluations.
«If you don't like it, then take it to court» is a dare that can be thrown out cavalierly, because the
parenting coordinator role permits these court appointees to hold over the head
of objecting parties the
power — baselessly presumed to be executed in good faith — to obtain the ear
of the judge first, and to poison the well.
One
of the distinguishing features
of parent coordination, according to Johnston and Roseby, is that the
parenting coordinator is given some kind
of arbitration
power by the court.