If CO2 actually possessed the capacity to emit «
powerful back radiation» its thermal conductivity results would reflect this by being larger not smaller.
Not exact matches
«Maybe people could control robotic machines from Jupiter's outer moon Callisto, where the
radiation is much less
powerful, especially on its
back side,» Martin suggests.
When the solar wind carries CMEs and other
powerful bursts of
radiation into a planet's magnetic field, it can cause the magnetic field on the
back side to press together, a process known as magnetic reconnection.
This acts as a positive feedback on the surface warming, because water vapor itself is a
powerful greenhouse gas that, like CO2, absorbs and re-emits longwave
radiation back to the surface.
Volcanoes are
powerful sources of sulfate aerosols that counteract global warming by reflecting incoming solar
radiation back into space.
And is this range which part «climate science» or the climate science pseudoscience think far infrared is a
powerful source warming earth - this is the whole idea of
back radiation: http://scienceofdoom.com/2010/07/17/the-amazing-case-of-
back-
radiation/
Powerful arguments Joel, but the GHE involving
back radiation is just a theory right and I'm sure you could demolish it if you put your mind to it.
«- If
back radiation is so
powerful and it is a heat source, why don't we use it?»