Sentences with phrase «powerful questions in»

One of the most powerful questions in politics is «whose side are you on?»

You've described the benefits of your solution, you've used the most powerful question in sales to discover how it will solve their specific problems, and perhaps even crafted a compelling ROI analysis.

Not exact matches

Questions are the most powerful tool in a world - class leader's toolbox,» notes author Mike Michalowicz on OPEN Forum, for example.

A recent article in Fortune asked a powerful and profound question that affects consumers, companies and the economy in a major and lasting way: «Where have all the shoppers gone?»

All of which is both interesting and useful, but it begs the question: Why is simply paying attention to the good things in your life so powerful?

Each year, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention determines how well the system is working by surveying Americans and asking a simple but powerful question: Did you have problems paying medical bills in the last 12 months?

This was the opening question asked by Vanity Fair special correspondent Sarah Ellison during a powerful session at Fortune's Most Powerful Women summit in Washington, D.C. this morning, shortly after former Fox News host Gretchen Carlson took thpowerful session at Fortune's Most Powerful Women summit in Washington, D.C. this morning, shortly after former Fox News host Gretchen Carlson took thPowerful Women summit in Washington, D.C. this morning, shortly after former Fox News host Gretchen Carlson took the stage.

The question is, how can you diagnose them before they sink you, manifesting themselves in a powerful, disruptive, surprising new competitor?

Speaking at Fortune «s Most Powerful Women International Summit in London, Gavet, whose company owns travel sites such as Priceline.com, Kayak.com and booking.com, said the European Union's effort to create its much - touted «single digital market» is «the biggest question for tech startups here in Europe.»

SAN JOSE, Calif. — Mark Zuckerberg may have laughed off questions that Facebook is too powerful when he appeared in front of Congress last month.

But there remained, before the central bank meeting on Thursday, many questions about how large the program would be and whether it would be powerful enough to reverse a two - year decline in inflation.

In my experience, working with sales and marketing to identify and agree on the questions that constitute each stage (or sub-stage) of the buying process can be a powerful aligning force, getting everyone to realize that buying is a buyer - driven process, and to agree that there are things that need to happen before you can expect to close the sale, today, regardless of where the buyer is in the procesIn my experience, working with sales and marketing to identify and agree on the questions that constitute each stage (or sub-stage) of the buying process can be a powerful aligning force, getting everyone to realize that buying is a buyer - driven process, and to agree that there are things that need to happen before you can expect to close the sale, today, regardless of where the buyer is in the procesin the process.

An equally unprecedented wave of complex risks, from climate change to cyber threats, calls into question the value of citizenship in even the most powerful economies in the world.

Gold's strength relative to commodities we outlined in our last note (Ask Better Questions to Make More Money), where we also explained how gold's relative value has powerful insight it can share on long term interest rates.

Those put into question your belief in the characteristics of the god, perhaps even the existence of the god itself, but it is still more comforting to assume something more powerful than yourself has your best interests in mind vs. the idea that we are left to our own devices — especially when you are surrounded by people that agree with and reinforce that idea and shun you when you do not agree with it.

Answering tough questions isn't easy, but failing to answer powerful questions is an exercise in procrastination simply because a symptom is the early sign of an ailment.

Typically this process leads to a characterization of God as a being so advanced, powerful, immortal, and not subject to the laws of time, matter, and space that his followers can make up any excuse they choose to address questions, since nothing about their god (or gods) can be subjected to any kind of objective verification or scrutiny, just like everything else in the religion.

As the surgeon and writer Atul Gawande noted in The New York Times recently, our medical system, powerful as it may be, is ill - equipped to step into the breach and answer crucial questions such as, «What is a good death?»

You say you don't know gods will because to try and think like god is too hard (which for the record I think is a cop out in any debate or discussion about god that I understand you really believe it and are not trying to duck around a question, but to say I don't know, god is too powerful to understand sort of halts discussion from there)

You say you don't know gods will because to try and think like god is too hard (which for the record I think is a cop out in any debate or discussion about god that I understand you really believe it and are not trying to duck around a question, but to say I don't know, god is too powerful to understand sort of halts discussion from there) but you also are saying to speak with him on a daily basis.

The redefinition of omnipotence and omniscience provide the groundwork for process thought's unique treatment of theodicy, the question of how the concept of an all powerful yet loving God can be reconciled with the existence of evil in the world.

My question boils down to: Why would a perfect all loving, all powerful, all knowing god CREATE the VERY ESSENCE of evil, and would that not indicate that god is evil in nature?

But if the Bible is God's word and therefore a powerful presence in my life, the proper question may be: how does God's word use me?

In the meantime, Wood appears to be sanguine that if the leading question of theological inquiry is kept explicitly in view, it is powerful enough not only to subsume the leading interest of each of the relevant academic disciplines but also to resist distortions that the institutionalization of the academic disciplines might tend to impose on theologIn the meantime, Wood appears to be sanguine that if the leading question of theological inquiry is kept explicitly in view, it is powerful enough not only to subsume the leading interest of each of the relevant academic disciplines but also to resist distortions that the institutionalization of the academic disciplines might tend to impose on theologin view, it is powerful enough not only to subsume the leading interest of each of the relevant academic disciplines but also to resist distortions that the institutionalization of the academic disciplines might tend to impose on theology.

It is precisely the question of how love is powerful in God, in contrast to traditional understandings of the nature of divine power, that continues to whet the theological appetite.

Particularly because Christianity in Asia has been closely associated with the Western powers, colonial and neo-colonial, and because Asian Christianity in general has tended to be associated with the powerful in Asian societies, this question is critically important.

The questions about religion and public life, those calling for «public» discussion, no longer focus on the verifiability of religious speech but concern quite other issues: methods of understanding and describing the religious realities, old and new, that we see appearing around us; useful criteria for assessing these religions and for defining and comprehending this new set of powers in our public life; and ways of protecting vital religious groups from the excesses of the public reaction to them, and protecting the public from the excesses of powerful religious groups — hardly questions a secular culture had thought it would have to take seriously!

In reflecting on the Truman - Churchill decision to use the atomic bomb, Niebuhr said, «The question is whether they were not driven by historic forces more powerful than any human decision.»

The renaissance of Islamic culture and politics, the rebirth of Shinto in Japan, the appearance of powerful Jewish, Hindu and Christian «fundamentalisms» in Israel, India and the U.S. — all these have raised important questions about the allegedly ineluctable process of secularization.

But the power and persistence of evil in frustrating the promised goodness of life raises questions as to whether God can be called perfectly powerful in any traditional sense.

One reason I think the Bible is such a powerful conversation - starter is that it asks the questions that are most important to humanity without providing neat and tidy answers in response.

The most important question is this: Is the work of art expressive of a powerful view of life and, regardless of subject matter, does it stir some religious sensitivity in the viewer?

But the demonic passions unleashed in history lead to the theological question, «How does the powerful and creative love in the human spirit turn into brutal and destructive cruelty?»

Yet if Palmer is correct, as I think he is, in taking objectivism to be the epistemology that informs the practices of the modern university, and if I am correct in suggesting that James and others had already fashioned powerful alternative theories of knowledge as early as 1880, a vital historical question arises.

The most powerful voice wrestling with the question of, if God be God, how in the name of all that is holy can «the War» be comprehended, I find to be that of Geoffrey Anketell Studdert - Kennedy.

Ultimately, as he states, the God creative enough «to make the entire observable universe in a dense dot of pure energy is incomprehensible, beyond human imagining,» but still «we can see the consequences of this unimaginably powerful creative act: a universe congenial to the ultimate formation of life, life giving rise to intelligence that can ask questions science can not answer.

This question is meaningless unless you first define The word «powerful» in the context of your question.

had to reply to your simplistic view of things... remember we are only human yet GOD is perfect, all powerful, all knowing and as humans we will never be able to see things from an omnipotent viewpoint such as GOD's... so remember bad things happen daily and it is GOD's will but who are we to question GOD allmighty when we only think in mindset of humans... do nt let ur foolish pride put a spotlight on ur ignorance...

In the face of all this powerful evil, the question the early Christians were asking is, «Where is God's kingdom?»

And that is why I shall repeatedly question whether we are required to adapt ourselves to the dualistic mythology that has been such a powerful influence in the history of culture and thought.

In the universities which were emerging, many, stirred by these powerful minds, were questioning the Christian faith.

Whether it is proper to utilize such powerful technology, with its «personalized» feedback loops, for the purpose of saving souls in this nation is an ethical question.

To be sure, many of the current manifestations of this Eastern trend have been shallow and cultish, but they have had a powerful influence in calling into question the uniqueness of the Christian faith.

Jesus, of course, answers the question of his identity with his powerful «I am» (ego eimi) statements, including the climactic «I am the resurrection and the life» in John 11:25.

The problem of suffering is usually posed as a question: «If God is all - powerful and all good, why does he allow evil to exist in the world?»

«This time around, I expect to ask President Trump a number of policy questions but also about how he is processing his amazing achievement: A man with no political experience winning the most powerful office in the world.»

However, the combative and powerful midfielder seems to still have question marks over his future, and the closer we move to next summer with no new agreement in place, it will leave the risk of seeing him depart on a free transfer open.

He's one of the most powerful men in the major leagues, but the Yankees» first baseman gets injured so often and so easily that he's a perennial question mark for the New Yorkers

Why can't people for God sake understand the angle the young man was coming from, this is a guy who has come out to suggest what he feel will be of great glory to the team, futbol is about winning trophy not the samba, champaign, tick taka or jambody style Of playwill be accredited to ur cv after retirement, every professional player will wants to be identify with a medal, mind you he have limited years to his career, therefore we should not allow sentment or affections we have for our various teams erode the basic objective of the game.we should also think about their future too, this guys are proffessionals which young lads are looking up to and questions will be ask tomorrow about theirs playing days.can people tell me why pele and some other famous players in the world both present and past are been celebrated today the answer is simply cos they are successful in their career and have trophy to show for it in their respective clubs or countries, why the complain in nigeria?its simply cos our team for quite a while now has not recorded any troph to her glory, fans should learn how to call a spade a spade in order to balance situation and also for better performance of the team.why then did arsene wenger hurridly went to buy more experienced players after the poor outing he had at the beggining of last season?this players know beta cos they are at the centre of it all, we don't have to trash what they say, we fans are only watching from screen, in as much as we beliv in arsen wenger, we should also know that without the boys no arsen wenger, fans should try to reason along with the players too.an hypotetical cases of similar to rvp has been tested by some players and have put them right over the coach and the team.so, whatelse does the fans needs to prove that futbol has gone beyond living in the past.for example, fabrigas and nasri were able to prove their critics wrong.thank God for them, we should always be objective in our submission, how else do we expect players to show their commitment to a team that was in 8 on the log table and later fought their way back to 3rd this boys are commendable and deserve to be encouraged, I think is high time the manager and the mgt board of arsenal futbol team get to know that game of futbol has gone beyond two teams domination, its now like a pendilum which can swing either way only with a powerful insrument called money.you can't eat ur cake and have.

Begovic also praised Conte for creating a «family atmosphere» and the goalkeeper then responded to a question from team - mate Victor Moses about which player had the most powerful shot, with defenders David Luiz and Branislav Ivanovic coming out on top in the eyes of the Bosnian.