The implicit value system of «catastrophe»,
a powerful side topic worthy of whole bodies of work surely can't be lightly entered into under the terms of their paper; yet no, they use that example as a guidance trigger phrase for qualifying as:
The difficulty was, that to say so, even for a scientist with the factsat his fingertips, was to go against a
powerful and intolerant conventional wisdom: «We liberals», he wrote, «who work in the fields of global HIV / AIDS and family planning take terrible professional risks if we
side with the pope on a divisive
topic such as this.