Not exact matches
I encourage you to read the post, but also take a look at the comments section,
where an interesting conversation is taking place about the possible unintended
consequences of shifting subsidies around, and also some
practical input from me and fellow school food blogger Ed Bruske about the critical difference between serving produce in school cafeterias and getting kids to actually eat it.
The remaining three cases are classified as «early warning of resistance,»
where the resistance is statistically significant, but not severe enough to have
practical consequences.
That's
where compliance is monitored, and enables the
consequence of «naming and shaming» (which can also have
practical and financial
consequences, though these are extrinsic to the agreement itself.)
But in those sectors
where money is tight, the main
practical consequence of this judgment is not to panic, at least not yet.