And yet, as climate blogger Joe Romm explained after the Nature study came out, we may have reached
a practical point of no return.
Not exact matches
He's developing an argument about the significance
of the doctrine
of the resurrection by discussing the logical consequence
of denying it (verses 12 - 19), going on a very typical Pauline digression almost as if he's overcome by joy at the positive truth and has to triumphantly proclaim it (verses 20 - 28) then finally
returning to drive home the
practical point again (verses 29 - 35).
This
point, combined with the previous one, means that he can talk about the causal influence, for example,
of molecules within the cell upon the cell's series
of living occasions, which can for
practical purposes be regarded as the «cell as a whole,» and he can speak about the
returned causal influence
of the living occasions upon the molecular constituents.
Some
practical points: Try to engage in the comment section
of your blog as much as possible, and try to create a safe and constructive atmosphere there so that people will
return.
She
pointed to the results
of the OECD's 2015 PISA survey, which foundthat
practical science experiments are negatively associated with pupil attainment — forcing authorities to
return to test scores as the main means
of judging what types
of lessons are worthwhile.
An auctioned cap or a tax with 100 %
return of the proceeds to the people is the most
practical policy for several reasons: (a) it would begin real carbon reductions quickly; (b) it would be an honest and transparent way
of treating the American people; (c) it would attract the broadest attainable political coalition across party lines; (d) it would be administratively simple for both the government and the private sector (with the tax or auctioned permits collected at the first
point of sale or import
of the carbon - containing fuel); (e) it would be a non-regressive way
of introducing the carbon price into the economy; and (f) it would avoid a fiasco such as the special interest feeding frenzy that surrounded the recently failed Boxer - Lieberman - Warner bill in Congress.