Sentences with phrase «practical reconciliation»

"Practical reconciliation" refers to the act of actively working towards resolving conflicts or differences in a practical and effective manner. It involves finding practical solutions, compromises, or agreements to bring about harmony or understanding between individuals or groups. Full definition
I have confidence that there is goodwill in the community to see this type of practical reconciliation accomplished.
The second idea for all of us is about practical reconciliation.
There are two main features which run through the government's practical reconciliation approach:
The 5 - point plan outlined by Minister for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Affairs at the ATSIC National Policy Conference in March 2002 reinforces the government's minimalist policy agenda on practical reconciliation.
It would be difficult to find a better summation of what practical reconciliation is.
On the other hand is the idea of practical reconciliation where we are reconciled by action alone.
The proposed changes to CDEP constitute part of DEWR's broader policy platform, the Indigenous Employment Policy, which reflects the government's commitment to practical reconciliation measures.
Note: I critique the adequacy of practical reconciliation in chapter 2 of this report.
This is a forum for Symposium delegates to share ideas and how your service is going about practical reconciliation.
The absence of an absolute commitment to overcoming such disadvantage - with short, medium and long term targets - masks the distinct lack of progress within the framework of practical reconciliation,» said Dr Jonas.
While overcoming Indigenous disadvantage is the only major point of agreement between the government and Indigenous leaders in regard to reconciliation, it does not follow that there is common assent to a practical reconciliation approach.
Significantly the Budget does not provide any increase in the government's existing allocation of $ 11 million funding for Indigenous - specific family violence projects over a four - year period, despite the intense media attention given to this subject over the past year and the government's use of this issue to reinforce its call for a practical reconciliation.
However, the Government's response is confined to issues that fall within the «practical reconciliation» agenda.
It is consistent with the «practical reconciliation» agenda; with the goals pursued by the Council of Australian Governments (COAG); and with the goals of the new arrangements for the administration of Indigenous affairs announced by the Commonwealth Government during 2004.
Again, the absence of a long term commitment to overcoming Indigenous disadvantage, with short, medium and long term targets, masks the distinct lack of progress in addressing Indigenous disadvantage within a practical reconciliation approach.
COAG endorses a National framework of principles for government service delivery to Indigenous Australians as well as confirming its commitment to the whole of government trials and practical reconciliation.
«Not only has the federal government not explicitly responded to the CAR documents, it has quite deliberately sought to shut down debate and avoid any engagement about the documents by using its stated commitment to practical reconciliation
The limited, reductive framework for «practical reconciliation» excludes consideration of a range of important human rights factors in setting policy.
While the new arrangements involve significant and radical change to the processes of government, they remain entirely consistent with the Government's «practical reconciliation» approach.
The overarching concern however is that if constructed and too narrowly focused on practical reconciliation, to the exclusion of other important factors it could be co-opted as a political tool for reinforcing and legitimizing what is ultimately a limited approach to Indigenous issues... As a result, the framework as a stand alone mechanism has the potential to reinforce practical reconciliation and marginalize further other issues of significance to Indigenous peoples.
The «assimilationist» goals of practical reconciliation, which seek to «maintain rather than transform the relationship of Indigenous people to the mainstream society»; and
There are some clear contrasts between the limiting framework of practical reconciliation and the more focused and accountable approach based on international guidance and standards.
The report highlights the differences between self - determination and self - empowerment; practical reconciliation and progressive realization and a rights framework for addressing Indigenous disadvantage; and by considering international developments in the recognition of Indigenous rights.
But now instead we face a deplorable situation in which not only has the federal government failed to respond adequately or comprehensively to CAR's recommendations, they have quite deliberately sought to shut down debate and avoid any engagement about them by stating that they are committed to practical reconciliation.
Nor does the Commonwealth's native title policy reflect these broader goals so integral to practical reconciliation.
The impoverished notion of practical reconciliation will not in and of itself lead to meaningful reconciliation between Indigenous and non-Indigenous peoples.
If «practical reconciliation» is to achieve the desired results, this is the hard reality that it must face.
Efforts to «close the gap» and boost Indigenous employment — which have been the focus of the «practical reconciliation» approach — have been undermined by our failure as a nation to address the truth and justice elements of the reconciliation process.
Prior to the National Apology, many argued that an apology would be purely symbolic, and that focus should be confined to pursuing «practical reconciliation».
Indeed this goal is the focus of the Federal government's policy of practical reconciliation.
the government sees meaningful resolution of native title issues as part of the process of practical reconciliation;
The current emphasis on «practical reconciliation» means that it is even more important to assess and evaluate in - put and out - put indicators in terms of human rights principles.
The discussion of governance matters proved quite difficult, possibly reflecting the relative lack attention that has been given to such matters in developing the Draft framework for reporting on Indigenous disadvantage in a climate of «practical reconciliation».
Perhaps reflecting an emphasis on «practical reconciliation», the Draft framework consequently fails to develop a series of indicators of Indigenous socio - economic disadvantage within a rights framework.
The Government's emphasis on «practical reconciliation» has acted to exclude rights issues from the discussion of Indigenous policy.
Under the rubric of «practical reconciliation» emphasized by the Government, the acknowledgment sought by Indigenous people of rights, such as self - determination and distinct cultural rights, has been portrayed as being more concerned with symbolism than practical improvements in real life outcomes.
However, from a social justice perspective, the emphasis on «practical reconciliation» in the Government's response is problematic.
In questioning the policy of «practical reconciliation», John Borrows proffers the alternative of «practical recolonisation», whereby Indigenous Australians would reclaim the land and political power wrested from them through colonisation.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z