Sentences with phrase «practice in the state courts»

She is admitted to practice in all state courts in Louisiana, as well as the United States District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana.

Valerie is licensed to practice in all state courts in Ohio, the state of Georgia, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, the United States Tax Court, and the United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of Ohio and the Northern District of Georgia.

Ms. Molloy is admitted to practice in State Courts in New York, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania, as well as in the United States District Courts for the Southern District of New York, Eastern District of New York, Northern District of New York, District of New Jersey, Eastern District of Pennsylvania, and Eastern District of Wisconsin.

Our attorneys, however, are only licensed to practice in state courts that are specifically enumerated in their individual attorney profiles.

As an antitrust lawyer, Stevens didn't practice in state court.

Though he is admitted to the federal bar, he focuses his appellate practice in the state courts.

Bill has been admitted to practice in state courts, as well as U.S. District Court.

She is admitted to practice in all state courts of Tennessee and Georgia, the U.S. District Courts for the Northern, Middle, and Southern Districts of Georgia, and the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the 4th and 11th Circuits.

Beth is licensed to practice in all state courts in Ohio, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, and the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio.

He is licensed to practice in all state courts in Florida.

Jason is admitted to practice in the State courts of Nebraska and Iowa, the U.S. District Courts for the District of Nebraska, the Northern District of Iowa, and the Southern District of Iowa, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, and the Supreme Court of the United States.

Tim is currently admitted to practice in all state courts in Louisiana and federal court in the Eastern and Middle Districts of Louisiana.

A 1982 graduate of William Mitchell College of Law, he is admitted to practice in the state courts of Minnesota and Wisconsin, the Federal District Court in the District of Minnesota, and the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals.

Licensed by the Supreme Court of the State of Texas to practice in all state courts in Texas Licensed to practice in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals and the United States Supreme Court

Not exact matches

Filed in a Los Angeles federal court, the suit states that «Uber failed to implement and maintain reasonable security procedures and practices appropriate to the nature and scope of the information compromised in the data breach,» according to Bloomberg.

The next day that firm filed two lawsuits against Diageo, one in federal court, raising a suite of traditional trademark and unfair business practices claims, but the other in New York State Supreme Court, seeking a permanent injunction under a seldom - used statute available only to charitable organizations, known as Section 135 of the New York General Businesscourt, raising a suite of traditional trademark and unfair business practices claims, but the other in New York State Supreme Court, seeking a permanent injunction under a seldom - used statute available only to charitable organizations, known as Section 135 of the New York General BusinessCourt, seeking a permanent injunction under a seldom - used statute available only to charitable organizations, known as Section 135 of the New York General Business Law.

In 2014, the Maine Supreme Court rejected Bailey's bid to practice law in the statIn 2014, the Maine Supreme Court rejected Bailey's bid to practice law in the statin the state.

«The New York State Court of Appeals, the state's highest court, has reaffirmed the long - standing legal practice and widely held understanding of the application of the Rent Stabilization Law's vacancy decontrol provisions,» REBNY's president John Banks said in a stateState Court of Appeals, the state's highest court, has reaffirmed the long - standing legal practice and widely held understanding of the application of the Rent Stabilization Law's vacancy decontrol provisions,» REBNY's president John Banks said in a stateCourt of Appeals, the state's highest court, has reaffirmed the long - standing legal practice and widely held understanding of the application of the Rent Stabilization Law's vacancy decontrol provisions,» REBNY's president John Banks said in a statestate's highest court, has reaffirmed the long - standing legal practice and widely held understanding of the application of the Rent Stabilization Law's vacancy decontrol provisions,» REBNY's president John Banks said in a statecourt, has reaffirmed the long - standing legal practice and widely held understanding of the application of the Rent Stabilization Law's vacancy decontrol provisions,» REBNY's president John Banks said in a statement.

The Competition Bureau's lead prosecutor, John Rook, argued the court should uphold the tribunal's rendering, stating it «already determined there were anti-competitive practices in the past, present and inference of future.»

Mr. Bruckner is licensed to practice in New York and New Jersey and is admitted to practice before the United States District Court for the Eastern and Southern Districts of New York, the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, United States Court of Appeals for the Second and Seventh Circuits, and the United States Supreme Court.

Mr. Adams is admitted to practice in New York, the United States District Courts for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York, and the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin.

I learned this in my first few months of law practice in 1964 when, as low person on the totem pole, I had to handle routine motions in both state and federal courts.

Mormons do not run religious schools that take public aid from the state, such as secular textbooks, though that is a practice approved by the Supreme Court in states with substantial numbers of parochial schools.

In 1972, the Supreme Court declared in Wisconsin v. Yoder that the state violates free - exercise rights if it infringes upon a sincerely held religious practice in such a way as to affect its exercisIn 1972, the Supreme Court declared in Wisconsin v. Yoder that the state violates free - exercise rights if it infringes upon a sincerely held religious practice in such a way as to affect its exercisin Wisconsin v. Yoder that the state violates free - exercise rights if it infringes upon a sincerely held religious practice in such a way as to affect its exercisin such a way as to affect its exercise.

That seems likely to remain the case in the immediate future, even though the recent U.S. Supreme Court decision permits state legislatures to enact some modest regulation of abortion practice.

The Stenberg dissenters repeatedly cited and quoted Justice O'Connor's abortion opinions from the 1980s, in which she had criticized the Court for operating as «the nation's ex officio medical board with powers to approve or disapprove medical and operative practices and standards throughout the United States.»

There has always been some tension between the Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise protections of the First Amendment, but the Supreme Court, when considering a similar challenge to the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act in 2005 — wherein the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals had ruled that granting protections to religious prisoners amounted to a violation of the Establishment Clause — ruled that alleviating a state - imposed substantial burden on religious practice did not violate the Establishment Clause.

He has been licensed in the State of California since 1979, and is also licensed to practice law before the United States District Courts (Central, Northern and Southern Districts), the United States Bankruptcy Courts (Central, Northern and Southern Districts), the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, and the United States Tax Court.

A state appeals court has reversed a McHenry County judge's decision to allow a lay midwife, charged in Lake County with manslaughter in the 2000 home delivery of an apparent stillborn child, to practice midwifery.

The Illinois Appellate Court this week found that the judge in the McHenry civil case erred by raising the bar too high for state prosecutors seeking to ban Yvonne Cryns from practicing midwifery without a license.

As a result, even if a private sports program that uses town fields, rinks, diamonds, or courts is required to comply with state mandates regarding concussion safety, I believe that there is a huge sports safety gap which, absent voluntary implementation by a private sports program of youth sports health and safety best practices, such as those we are pilot testing in Grand Prairie, Texas this fall as part of our SmartTeams ™ program, can and should be filled by a municipality by exercising its power of the permit.

the reason for the court's blocking of a travel restriction put in place by the President of the United States of America for purposes of national security was because the president (when he was a candidate) mentioned something about banning certain people (i.e. those people who believe it is their duty to enslave the world under sharia law because god tells them to) during this time of war against those elements of said group who actually practice what they preach

The Padilla case in 2005 did give rise to a precedent in the United States Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit that supports the practice, although a subsequent ruling in the Al - Marri case arguably muddied the waters.

She was said to have been appointed from private practice to the Supreme Court at a very young age in May, 1997 by the then head of state, Jerry John Rawlings.

Brian is admitted to the practice of law in New York State and in the federal courts.

The Town of Amherst is set to file a lawsuit in State Supreme Court against major manufacturers and distributors of opioid pain medication, accusing the companies of public nuisance, fraud, negligence and unfair business practices.

Democratic leaders challenged the practice in State Supreme Court, and it was struck down last week by a judge who ruled that it exceeded legal contribution limits.

At 6 p.m. Tuesday, the New York City Bar Association will host «The State of Criminal Discovery in New York State,» discussing «the current law applicable to criminal discovery in New York State courts; responses to the Criminal Law Committee's statewide survey of the judiciary, defense bar and district attorneys regarding current practices; criminal discovery law in other states; and proposed reforms.»

Ashley Moody has excelled as a commercial litigator in private practice, a federal prosecutor and a state circuit court judge.

The matter was then adjourned till October 12, 2017 for pre-trial hearing in line with Section 3 of the Kwara State High Court Practice Direction, 2013, after which a new date for trial would be set.

According to the New York State Unified Court System, Carl Irace, East Hampton Town's deputy town attorney, is late in renewing his registration with the state as a practicing attorney, resulting in his status being designated as «delinquent.&rState Unified Court System, Carl Irace, East Hampton Town's deputy town attorney, is late in renewing his registration with the state as a practicing attorney, resulting in his status being designated as «delinquent.&rstate as a practicing attorney, resulting in his status being designated as «delinquent.»

«The Committee, which will sit in camera, in line with normal practice, consists of three (3) Justices of the Superior Court appointed by the Judicial Council, and two (2) other persons appointed by the Chief Justice, on the advise of the Council of State.

The matter was then adjourned to 12th October, 2017 for pre-trial hearing in line with Section 3 of the Kwara State High Court Practice Direction, 2013, after which a new date for trial would be set.

Judge Jones is admitted to practice in New York State, Federal District Court (E.D.N.Y, S.D.N.Y.), United States Tax Court, Federal Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, and the Supreme Court of the United States.

However, the Harrison Act did not prohibit heroin and cocaine, and it was overturned in 1925 in Linder v. the United States when the Supreme Court ruled that the federal government didn't have the authority to regulate medical practice.

A split Second Circuit overturned a district court ruling that a New York law requiring nonresident attorneys to keep a physical office in the state as a prerequisite to practice is unconstitutional, saying it wasn't implemented for protectionist reasons.

Waterboarding, stress positions, extended sleep deprivation, nudity and prolonged solitary confinement have all been deplored by the U.S. State Department when practiced by other countries, by U.S. civilian courts in cases other than those dealing with terrorism, and by respected global humanitarian organizations such as the International Committee for the Red Cross.

The California law, adopted first, faced two court challenges from SOCE practitioners on the grounds that it violated their free speech rights, but last August a federal appeals court upheld the statute, distinguishing between the rights practitioners enjoy to advocate for the practice in public debate and the limitations on the therapeutic practices they can employ in their professional conduct governed by state licensing.

In a judgment dismissing the claim, Justice Rilwan Aikawa held that following the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Attorney General of Ondo State vs Attorney General of the Federation and 36 Others (2002), that ICPC had a statutory duty to investigate allegations of corrupt practices made against any person or authority in Nigeria and that neither the claimants nor the court has the discretion to stop a statutory agency of government from performing its dutieIn a judgment dismissing the claim, Justice Rilwan Aikawa held that following the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Attorney General of Ondo State vs Attorney General of the Federation and 36 Others (2002), that ICPC had a statutory duty to investigate allegations of corrupt practices made against any person or authority in Nigeria and that neither the claimants nor the court has the discretion to stop a statutory agency of government from performing its duCourt in the case of Attorney General of Ondo State vs Attorney General of the Federation and 36 Others (2002), that ICPC had a statutory duty to investigate allegations of corrupt practices made against any person or authority in Nigeria and that neither the claimants nor the court has the discretion to stop a statutory agency of government from performing its dutiein the case of Attorney General of Ondo State vs Attorney General of the Federation and 36 Others (2002), that ICPC had a statutory duty to investigate allegations of corrupt practices made against any person or authority in Nigeria and that neither the claimants nor the court has the discretion to stop a statutory agency of government from performing its dutiein Nigeria and that neither the claimants nor the court has the discretion to stop a statutory agency of government from performing its ducourt has the discretion to stop a statutory agency of government from performing its duties.

He concentrates his practice on general litigation in Federal and State Courts.