The real problem is that much «Wall of Separation» rhetoric implies there is a clear, impregnable line between church and state activity when in
practice over the twentieth century the principle of church - state separation has become one of lively democratic contestation and a degree of flexibility, allowing Catholics and other religious organizations to enter the public sphere and participate on the same terms as any other group.
As I noted in The Same Thing
Over and Over, «The debate over the sanctity of «schoolhouse leadership,» then, is really a debate between the defenders of early - twentieth - century management practices and those championing the management practices [favored] by leading public and private organizations in recent decades.&ra
Over and
Over, «The debate over the sanctity of «schoolhouse leadership,» then, is really a debate between the defenders of early - twentieth - century management practices and those championing the management practices [favored] by leading public and private organizations in recent decades.&ra
Over, «The debate
over the sanctity of «schoolhouse leadership,» then, is really a debate between the defenders of early - twentieth - century management practices and those championing the management practices [favored] by leading public and private organizations in recent decades.&ra
over the sanctity of «schoolhouse leadership,» then, is really a debate between the defenders of early -
twentieth -
century management
practices and those championing the management
practices [favored] by leading public and private organizations in recent decades.»