Sentences with phrase «practice under state statutes»

While practice act oversight varies by state, athletic trainers practice under state statutes recognizing them as qualified health care professionals similar to physical therapists, occupational therapists and other health care professionals.

Not exact matches

The next day that firm filed two lawsuits against Diageo, one in federal court, raising a suite of traditional trademark and unfair business practices claims, but the other in New York State Supreme Court, seeking a permanent injunction under a seldom - used statute available only to charitable organizations, known as Section 135 of the New York General Business Law.

«This is going to move abortion into public health and medical practice rather than under criminal statute,» Ginsburg stated in an interview with the Rockland County Times.

In this podcast, Dr. Freiberg explains district responsibilities under the state anti-bullying statutes; explores the need for a cultural shift away from punishing bad behavior to teaching kids essential life skills; and, discusses restorative practices and the positive outcomes achieved by schools that are implementing them.

The States believe the practices prohibited under § 310 (a) are already prohibited by the FTC Act and state unfair and deceptive trade practices statutes.

Technicians in the military or naval service of the United States, United States Department of Agriculture, the United States Veterans Administration or the United States Public Health Service, in the practice of such technical procedures in obedience to the requirements of the laws of the United States, while engaged in the performance of the actual duties prescribed under the appropriate statutes of the United States;

Thompson will, in the days and weeks ahead, be contacting state and federal officials to stop the improper sales of Grand Theft Auto IV to anyone under seventeen years of age, as any such sales violate state and federal fraudulent and deceptive trade practices statutes.

His current practice focuses on defending loan servicers from claims made under the FCRA, FDCPA, TCPA and various state law consumer protection statutes.

For over thirty years, Mr. Miklave has represented employers and management in all areas of employment, civil rights, and traditional labor law, including issues arising under federal and state anti-discrimination and anti-retaliation statutes; non-compete agreements and other post-employment restrictions; wage and hour investigations and litigation; multi-employer pension plan withdrawal liability and administration; collective - bargaining negotiations, administration and enforcement proceedings; corporate restructurings, reorganizations and plant closings; and employment practices and policies.

These cases often involve claims brought under TILA, HOEPA, RESPA, FCRA, FDCPA, ECOA, the Fair Housing Act, state unfair and deceptive practices statutes (UDAP), privacy laws, and the common law.

We also have significant experience in administrative and other regulatory litigation, including agency rule challenges, regulatory investigations under state and federal false claims acts and unfair trade practice statutes, and defending clients in related individual and class action civil suits.

Chapter 370, Section 20 - 9 (a) of the General Statutes of Connecticut states that no person may practice medicine unless licensed under Section 20 - 10 of the statute.

Therefore, except in rare instances in which the scope of medical assisting practice is addressed in a different statute, medical assistants work under the Medical Practice Act of each state, and the regulations, policies, and rulings of the Board of Medical Examiners of eacpractice is addressed in a different statute, medical assistants work under the Medical Practice Act of each state, and the regulations, policies, and rulings of the Board of Medical Examiners of eacPractice Act of each state, and the regulations, policies, and rulings of the Board of Medical Examiners of each state.

The Supreme Court of Massachusetts held that a landlord was not liable under a state statute making unlawful any «unfair or deceptive acts or practices in the conduct of any trade or commerce» where he leased an apartment to a young, childless couple without disclosing the possibility of lead paint in the apartment.

The court looked to the relevant Connecticut licensing statutes and determined that according to Connecticut law, «competent real estate brokers who are duly licensed and currently practicing in other states with licensing requirements and reciprocity provisions similar to Connecticut's will be given preferential treatment in obtaining their Connecticut licenses... an out - of - state broker may not simply come into Connecticut and do business as a real estate broker under the putative authority of his valid out - of - state broker's license.»