tha tis
a practice of some other religions, but the word does not even exist in Mormon scripture as a practice of the church.
Article six declared Catholicism the religion of Spain, tolerated the private
practice of other religions, and prohibited the public propagation of non «Catholic religion.
Not exact matches
The crux
of the act is simply this: illegal wage bias (based on race,
religion, sex, national origin, age, or disability) occurs «when a discriminatory compensation decision or
other practice is adopted, when a person becomes subject to a discriminatory compensation decision or
other practice, or when a person is affected by application
of a discriminatory compensation decision or
other practice, including each time wages, benefits, or
other compensation is paid, resulting in whole or in part from such a decision or
other practice.»
It is the policy
of Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. to provide equal opportunity in employment throughout the corporation for all qualified applicants and employees without discrimination against any person because
of a person's race, color,
religion (including religious dress and grooming
practices), sex / gender (including pregnancy, childbirth or related medical conditions and breast feeding), national origin, ancestry, gender identity, gender expression, legally - protected medical condition, physical or mental disability, age, military or veteran status, marital status, sexual orientation, genetic information or any
other basis protected by applicable law.
If you think that they should be held responsible for what
others who happen to
practice a misguided version
of their
religion do, then there are many things that you yourself oughta be responsilbe for that people belonging to groups you identify with have done.
Atheists: I know many there are many people that
practice religion just by fanaticism, I've seen many people in my opinion stupid (excuse the word) praying to saints hopping to solve their problems by repeating pre-made sentences over and over, but there are
others different, I don't think
Religion and Science need to be opposites, I believe in God, I'm Catholic and I have many reasons to believe in him, I don't think however that we should pray instead
of looking for the cause and applying a solution, Atheists think they are smart because they focus on Science and technology instead
of putting their faith in a God, I don't think God will solve our problems, i think he gave us the means to solve them by ourselves that's were God is, also I think that God created everything but not as a Magical thing but stablishing certain rules like Physics and Quimics etc. he's not an idiot and he knew how to make it so everything was on balance, he's the Scientist
of Scientist the Mathematic
of Mathematics, the Physician
of Physicians, from the tiny little fact that a mosquito, an insect species needs to feed from blood from a completely different species, who created the mosquitos that way?
For instance, in a colorful case involving a city ordinance restricting the
practice of animal sacrifice, the Court severely criticized officials for acting out
of animosity towards the Santeria
religion, which engages in the ritualistic slaughter
of pigeons, goats, and turtles (among
other animals) and at least sometimes leaves the carcasses along roadsides and in
other public places.
katfish - Although I am no longer a
practicing Mormon (I disagree with many
of their beliefs), I was raised in the church and we were never taught to hate
other religions.
We can assume that all the Justices sitting on the Court today, like
other humans, have their own preferences and biases about
religion, but the judicial opinions
of one
of them, Justice John Paul Stevens, raise more than a slight suspicion that some
of his actions on the bench stem from animosity, if not to animal sacrifice, at least to certain less exotic religious beliefs and
practices.
If they really cared about sticking to the letter
of their
religion we wouldn't see them overlooking so many
other obvious
practices that run contrary to the Church's teachings.
On the
other hand, one must welcome the true conquests
of the Enlightenment, human rights, and especially the freedom
of faith and its
practice, and recognize these as being essential elements for the authenticity
of religion. . . .
I am neither a christian or muslim but what right do christians have in making fun
of muslims and their books when so much trash exists in their houses only difference being that
other religions are open about their
practices and even accept their mistakes..
Maintaining separation
of church and stat s leaves everyone free to
practice their own beliefs and not have government forcing
other's
religion down our children's throats at school.
People should
practice their
religion at home or at their church and leave it out
of the workplace
other than setting a good example
of honest behaviour.
The
practices and beliefs
of members
of the Church
of Jesus Christ
of Latter - day Saints is very different from the FLDS and
other religions that
practice polygamy, and the polygamist lifestyles recently being represented in the media in no way reflect the lifestyle
of active members
of the Church
of Jesus Christ
of Latter - day Saints.
The archbishop criticised the state for not fulfilling its constitutional obligation to ensure «equal status and equal right in the
practice of the Hindu, Buddhist, Christian and
other religions».
The government should not be permitted to create incentives for religious
practice or belief (like giving favored status to religious organizations, as compared to
other nonprofits), to facilitate the religious
practices of some at the expense
of others (like offering vocal prayers in public schools), or to accommodate one
religion but not
others with similar needs or problems (like limiting draft exemptions to members
of traditional «peace churches») Within these guidelines, religious accommodations are fully in keeping with the First Amendment — albeit in conflict with strict separation.
If that is NOT what you are suggesting, please explain in what ways — how and where — you would accept the «free
practice of religion» anywhere
other than in a religious building or at home.
The Declaration affirms: «Everyone has the right to freedom
of thought, conscience, and
religion; this right includes freedom to change his
religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with
others and in public or private, to manifest his
religion or belief in teaching,
practice, worship, and observance» (Article 18).
Enough has been said to suggest how deeply the
religion of the Hebrews was enmeshed with the beliefs and
practices of other early nomadic and agricultural peoples.
Such are the Wahhabi teachings concerning the fundamentals
of the faith, but concerning the consequences, the particular requirements
of religion, they follow the orthodox teachings
of the school
of Hanbali, which follows the Qur» an and the Hadith (Tradition), and refuses deduction — although they do not forbid the code
of practices of any
of the
other Imams.
The fact that humans inflict harm upon themselves and
others is in no means a reflection
of the essence
of the
religion they follow especially if they are not
PRACTICING!
Panthrotheism does not discriminate or believe the bible is wrong, in analogy no one can claim that our human ancestors are wrong because they were naked or ate raw meats.We have now to accept that we are evolving.What is important that we survive.and still love each
other in general despite conflicts.No one is wrong in believing and
practicing any
religion that is pro life.Some people thinks that any contadiction to classical faith is wrong, un aware that humans survive the trials in history was because
of change and adaptation, in short evolution.its not anti religiom
And there are still sects
of this cult that secretly
practice this pedo lifestyle!!!!!! And, most distressing
of all, given that we're talking about someone who could become the most powerful man in the world, the Mormon church teaches that Mormons can lie if it suits their needs to impose their «
religion» on
others!
The bill, called the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), would protect the right
of every person to
practice his
religion, without exception, unless the government can show that it bas a «compelling» reason to interfere (meaning that the reasons for the interference are extraordinarily important and can not reasonably be attained in any
other way).
Christian interest in Buddhism and the attempt to appropriate its insights is far more widespread than Buddhist interest in Christianity Still, the situation is not a simple one in Japan, he said, Much
of the vitality
of religious life and
practice in Japan is in the so - called new
religions, some
of which draw on Buddhism more than
others.
Tasawwuf is a spiritual path through which one seeks to rise above and evolve beyond the limited teachings, beliefs, rituals,
practices, etc.
of organized
religion, whether Islam or any
other religion, and establish a constant awareness
of the One so as to receive all guidance from the One through one's heart.
The idea that mysticism floats free is something that Christianity, Judaism, Islam and
other religions would react against because their mystical teachings are a part
of the complex
of being a Christian, Jew or Muslim, and they coexist with
practices, beliefs, institutions and so forth.
This is exactly where the problem in this country lies, knowledge
of one
religion (the
practiced theology
of your family or household) and assumptions and criticisms on
others... Christians hatting muslims, Jewishand musims disliking each
other.
Edward L. Cleary, a Catholic priest, says that «for every Catholic actively
practicing his or her
religion, in many countries an equal or larger number
of Latin Americans participate in some
other form
of religion, «5 and Brazilian archbishop Lucas Moreira Neves, Secretary
of the National Conference
of Brazilian Bishops in 1985, taking into account all these events, has roundly affirmed that «The springtime
of the sects could also be the winter
of the Catholic Church.
Despite the
religion of the founding fathers, they wanted
others to
practice their different beliefs if they wanted.
One can see this metaphysical scheme behind the words
of Mason and Jefferson in the two acts
of the Virginia Assembly quoted above: «that all men are equally entitled to the free exercise
of religion, according to the dictates
of conscience; and that it is the mutual duty
of all to
practice Christian forbearance, love, and charity towards each
other.»
The first part deals with why the individual's right
of freedom to «profess
practice and propagate
religion», and to convert to another faith and
religion inherent in it, is a condition and guardian
of all
other democratic freedoms and fundamental human rights in State, society and culture.
Lt. Cmdr. Christensen went on to say that «all service members are free to exercise their constitutional right to
practice their
religion in a manner that is respectful
of other individuals» rights to follow their own belief systems; and in ways that are conducive to good order and discipline; and that do not detract from accomplishing the military mission»...
To a certain extent, Christianity could resist these kinds
of evil structures; so it was not a denial
of other religions, but the denial
of evil
practices which were exploitative, oppressive and dehumanizing.
I like how Muslims arrest anyone
of other religions in their own countries, but demand we allow them to
practice Islam in ours.
While Morelos's Constitution
of Apatzingán was never put into
practice, the plan
of Iguala (1821), drawn up by Iturbide after independence, also confirmed the official status
of Catholicism as the state
religion and denied toleration to all
other religions.32 The war for independence, in
other words, was reasonably conservative in purpose, especially with respect to the church.
Each deserves the freedom to
practice any
religion they wish, but not at the cost
of infringing upon
other's rights.
That's exactly what's at the heart
of this — that the use
of public funds (e.g., tax dollars) should NOT be used to promote (e.g., force down the throat
of others) any particular
religion or religious belief or
practice — that money shouldn't be taken by non-Christians by force (via taxation) and then given to Christians to put up displays
of Christian religious symbolism.
No
other religious -
practicing country embraces freedom
of religion as strongly as the United States.
It was started by people
of other religions who wanted to spread their false beliefs and
practices.»
William's simple statement made me realize I haven't talked much about
other religions with our children, and the particularities
of our Christian
practice flare up when I think about William comparing himself to Noah and Sarah.
So it goes to show that no matter what
religion you
practice, everyone tries to push their ideas on
others instead
of worrying about themselves...
Unethical or religious freedom??? What about the LDS
practice of Proxy Baptism — baptizing deceased persons
of other religions into the LDS faith without the written consent
of the family members
of the deceased (proxy LDS baptisms have been performed on past Catholic Popes and
other top religious figures).
I do not
practice any
religion and I think what he is doing is a beautiful gesture and I am sure is appreciated more than words can express by the victims
of these and any
other tragedies.
For the first half
of the twentieth century, Pentecostal belief and
practice remained separate from mainstream denominational
religion forming its own denominations like the Assemblies
of God (the largest Pentecostal denomination), The Church
of God in Christ, and many
others.
I find this
practice disrespectful
of all
other religions.
And regarding the fact that
other religions practice forms
of baptism and ritualistic washings muddies the water even more.
What does this mean then for the water baptisms, and not just in Christianity, but also in Judaism, and in the numerous
other religions around the world and throughout time that
practiced some form
of baptism in water?
at least in every single muslim country someone can
practice their
religion... and i know for a fact that theres dozens
of churches in jordan and many
other muslim countries, JUST not in saudi arabia, which you people feel obliged to keep poking at... if you don't respect their most holy spot, how do you call yourselves «civilized people», more like bullies..