The neuropsychologist, contrary to the opinions of the psychiatrist and neurologist instructed, raised the issue of
vulnerability and that due to
pre-existing emotional
vulnerability, together with her perceived disability,
social isolation and problems in executive functioning since the SAH, Ms D was even more vulnerable to being exploited and manipulated by others and at high risk that she would allow the substantial damages she was to receive to be gambled away by her partner in order to appease and placate him.