The preamble states that:
The preamble states that the High Court has held that the common law «recognises a form of native title that reflects the entitlement of the indigenous inhabitants of Australia, in accordance with their laws and customs, to their traditional lands».
The draft
preamble states in part that: «[s] ince time immemorial our land has been inhabited by Aborigines and Torres Strait Islanders, who are honoured for their ancient and continuing cultures.»
The preamble states that the right of self - determination is vital to health outcomes: see Indigenous Peoples» Center for Documentation, Research and Information (doCip), doCip Update, No. 32 - 33 - November 1999 / February 2000, doCip, Geneva 2000, http://www.docip.org.
The preamble states that «Justice requires that, if acts that extinguish native title are to be to validated or to be allowed, compensation on just terms and with a special right to negotiate its form, must be provided to the holders of the native title.»
[5] The constitution's
preamble states that the Liberal Party «strives to provide a flexible and democratic structure whereby all Canadians can obtain [information and participate in] action both electoral and non-electoral.»
This commenter noted that
the preamble states that the requirement for a court order would not apply if the disclosure would otherwise be permitted under the rule.
The Preamble states that the Hague Convention seeks «to protect children internationally from the harmful effects of their wrongful removal or retention and to establish procedures to ensure their prompt return to the State of their habitual residence, as well as to secure protection for the rights of access.»
This is a substantial piece of legislation aimed at reducing and managing the use by industry of substances designated as «toxic,» and, as
the preamble states in part, will require
This is set out in the Statute of Westminster 1931, whose
preamble states: any alteration in the law touching the Succession to the Throne or the Royal Style and Titles...
So with all
that preamble you state: Using their calculation, you could argue that many of the models fail to be predicted by the ensemble of models... surely you can see this is a crazy claim, as the models can hardly fail to predict themselves.
The preamble stated that the type of sanction applied would vary depending on factors such as the severity of the violation, whether the violation was intentional or unintentional, and whether the violation indicated a pattern or practice of improper use or disclosure of protected health information.
The preamble stated that if a covered entity learned of such a preference, it would be required to act in accordance with the preference.
Outside of the audit context,
the preamble stated that a health plan would be required, when requesting a disclosure, to limit its requests to the information required to achieve the purpose of the request; the regulation text did not include this requirement.
The preamble stated the statute's raison d'être: unauthorized printing was causing «very great detriment» to authors and book proprietors, «too often to the ruin of them and their families»; so the act was there «for preventing... such practices for the future, and for the encouragement of learned men to compose and write useful books».
Not exact matches
Well, actually Rev.... «We the People of the United
States, in order to form a more perfect Union, ESTABLISH JUSTICE,...» Yep, right there in the
Preamble of the Const itution... something you religious folks only support when to your advantage.
The protection of human rights is the business not just of the
state but of «every individual and organ of society» (
Preamble).
Phillip Cary paraphrases point five of the
preamble to the Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification when he
states that the signatories reached a «theological consensus that Luther's doctrine of justification by faith alone need not be Church - dividing.»
Though the nullifiers» case for the Constitution as a compact among sovereign
states is a lame one that flies in the face of the Preamble («We the People,» not «We the States»), Madison did lose some important battles to proponents of the prerogatives of the s
states is a lame one that flies in the face of the
Preamble («We the People,» not «We the
States»), Madison did lose some important battles to proponents of the prerogatives of the s
States»), Madison did lose some important battles to proponents of the prerogatives of the
statesstates.
The
Preamble of the 1937 Irish Constitution begins: «In the Name of the Most Holy Trinity, from Whom is all authority and to Whom, as our final end, all actions both of men and
States must be referred...»
The
preamble of the Constitution does not proclaim, «We, the factions of the United
States» of «We, the individuals of the United
States,» but «We, the people.»
The official
preamble Alcoholics Anonymous
states: «The only requirement for AA membership is a desire to stop drinking.»
The Constitution of India formulated by the founding fathers of India's nation -
state, has clearly laid down both in its Preamble and in its Directive Principles of State Policy, that politics and economics are instruments of social objectives rather than the rev
state, has clearly laid down both in its
Preamble and in its Directive Principles of
State Policy, that politics and economics are instruments of social objectives rather than the rev
State Policy, that politics and economics are instruments of social objectives rather than the reverse.
One comment
stated that information contained in the
preamble to the proposed rule is contradictory regarding malt vinegar and malt extract.
PREAMBLE The International Association of Child Sleep Consultants Code of Ethics
states the principles of ethical behavior that should be followed in the practice of child sleep consulting.
The Republic of Turkey is a democratic, secular and social
state governed by the rule of law; bearing in mind the concepts of public peace, national solidarity and justice; respecting human rights; loyal to the nationalism of Atatürk, and based on the fundamental tenets set forth in the
Preamble.
The Supreme Court unanimously said that the requirements of parliamentary approval or ratification is to ensure probity, transparency, and accountability as
stated in the
Preamble to the Constitution.
Shepherd's
preamble to the Gibraltar constitution
stated that «Her Majesty's Government will never enter into arrangements under which the people of Gibraltar will pass under the sovereignty of another
state against their wishes.»
Those who promoted the Parliament Act 1911 at least perceived this point, as is evident from the
preamble to the Act, which
states that it was, in effect, intended to be a holding measure pending full - scale reform of the second chamber.
Although the proposal acknowledges the 2015 rule includes some discussion of the role of
states» rights in implementing the Clean Water Act, it faults WOTUS for not including «a discussion in the 2015 rule
preamble of the meaning and importance of section 101 (b) in guiding the choices the agencies make in setting the outer bounds of jurisdiction of the Act.»
The culprit was indeed a doctor, Dr. Edwin J. Goodman and he hoped to profit from his brainchild as follows, from the
preamble to the bill» A bill for an act introducing a new mathematical truth and offered as a contribution to education to be used only by the
State of Indiana free of cost by paying any royalties whatever on the same, provided it is accepted and adopted by the official action of the legislature in 1897.»
Under this broad scope of authority to Congress, the
preamble to the copyright and patent clause sets forth the overarching purpose of intellectual property law in the United
States.
WE THE KIDS Share with children the book We the Kids: The
Preamble to the Constitution of the United
States, by David Catrow.
Agencies should not include statements in regulatory
preambles that they intend to preempt
State law through regulation, unless such preemption is also included in the codified regulation.
As she
states in the short
preamble to the work: «This is effectively the revenge of the collaborators.»
But late Tuesday, Bali time, the United
States bluntly refused to consider language — even in the nonbinding
preamble — that included any specific numbers for how much overall emissions from wealthy countries would need to be cut to have a chance of avoiding the worst climate dangers.
She explained that even in some of the most forward - looking environmental statutes in the United
States, like the legislation creating the national parks, the language on safeguarding this asset «unimpaired» for future generations is in the
preamble, and thus not «hard law.»
When taken together with the
Preamble, the Agreement
states loud and clear that all countries, both developing and developed, are mandated to conserve and enhance the integrity of ecosystems in a way that also respects human rights and the rights of indigenous peoples and protects biodiversity.
While EPA did not propose that CCS represented BSER [best system of emission reduction], EPA
stated in the
preamble of the proposed NSPS rule that «CCS is technologically feasible for implementation at new coal - fired power plants and its core components (CO2 capture, compression, transportation and storage) have already been implemented at commercial scale.»
This strong ethical and moral responsibility is derivable both from the universally accepted moral principles including the widely accepted golden rule which requires people to treat others as they wish to be treated, and international law including, but not limited to the «no harm» rule which is a widely recognized principle of customary international law whereby a
State is duty - bound to prevent, reduce and control the risk of environmental harm to other
states and a rule agreed to by all nations in the
preamble to the UNFCCC, the «polluter - pays principle» agreed to by almost all nations in the 1992 Rio Declaration, human rights law which requires nations to assure that their citizens enjoy human rights, and many other legal theories including tort law.
This strong ethical and moral responsibility is derivable both from the universally accepted moral principles including the widely accepted golden rule which requires people to treat others as they wish to be treated, and international law including, but not limited to: (a) the «no harm» rule which is a widely recognized principle of customary international law whereby a
State is duty - bound to prevent, reduce and control the risk of environmental harm to other
states, and a rule agreed to by all nations in the
preamble to the UNFCCC, (b) the «polluter - pays principle» agreed to by almost all nations in the 1992 Rio Declaration, (c) human rights law which requires nations to assure that their citizens enjoy human rights, and (d) many other legal theories including tort law.
This responsibility was expressly agreed to by the United
States when it ratified the United Nations Convention on Climate Change which contains the following acknowledgment of the US governments responsibility to prevent harm to those outside the United
States in the convention's
Preamble:
With that long
preamble, regarding «step functions», is it really that exotic to suggest that climate system might have metastable
states that it oscillates about?
It was enacted in order «to contribute to the attainment of a balance of effort between Member
States in receiving and bearing the consequences of receiving displaced persons in the event of a mass influx» (
Preamble, recital 5).
The
states named in the
preamble to the Constitution (an Act of British Parliament) as original
states were New South Wales, Victoria, Queensland, South Australia and Tasmania.
The mandated
preamble to the advertising bullet points enumerating smoking's ill effects
states, «A Federal Court has ruled that Altria, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco, Lorillard, and Philip Morris USA deliberately deceived the American public about the health effects of smoking, and has ordered those companies to make this statement.
The
preamble of the EPSR also aims to limit enforcement further in various ways, for example, by
stating that:
Thus, the 1963 Council of Europe Convention on the Reduction of Cases of Multiple Nationality and Military Obligations in Cases of Multiple Nationality (which has not been signed by the Republic of Lithuania) provides: the Member
States of the Council of Europe, signatory hereto, considering that cases of multiple nationality are liable to cause difficulties and that joint action to reduce as far as possible the number of cases of multiple nationality, as between member
States, corresponds to the aims of the Council of Europe (
Preamble); nationals of the Contracting Parties who are of full age and who acquire of their own free will, by means of naturalisation, option or recovery, the nationality of another Party shall lose their former nationality and they shall not be authorised to retain their former nationality (Article 1).
Linda Klein: I'd like to add, I can never be as articulate as Jim there, but I do want to add one point that — but when we read the United
States Constitution in the
preamble it says we the people of the United
States in order to form a more perfect union establish justice, ensure domestic tranquility, etc..
The majority of the court, writing at paragraph 28,
stated: «it can not be presumed that the
preamble in paragraph 1.1 (z), «an Officer or Employee whose employment has been terminated by the Company,» contemplates those officers or employees unlawfully terminated» [emphasis added].