In cases where the parties disagree on what the law is, a common law court looks to past
precedential decisions of relevant courts, and synthesizes the principles of those past cases as applicable to the current facts.
The Supreme Court issued an 8 - 1,
precedential decision in Scott v. Harris, effectively establishing a flat rule that a police officer in a high - speed chase that poses a threat to the safety of others does not violate the Fourth Amendment even where the officer places the fleeing motorist at risk of injury or death.
This precedential decision doesn't cut the government quite as much slack.
Not exact matches
The 2nd Circuit said the instructions given to the Silver jury by the trial judge were consistent with
precedential rulings in other cases prior to the Supreme Court
decision in the McDonnell case.
The
decision upheld the Second Circuit, but lacks
precedential value.
When this happens, the lower court
decision is upheld but it has no
precedential value, almost as if the court had never granted cert or heard the case.
Given the
precedential effect, CCSA sought review of the
decision by the California Supreme Court.
While the
decision doesn't have
precedential value, it should help inform us in determining who qualifies as a professional trader.
Commercial publishers also use legal staff to screen
decisions and make judgment calls on what
decisions should be considered material of
precedential value, and therefore be included in their databases.
But this specified expertise can not be imputed to all sorts of administrative
decision - makers, and so the
precedential value of Pezim and Southam is limited.
«The
precedential value [of the
decision] is huge.
[52] Correspondingly,
decisions where the production of these kinds of records have been denied will likely have little or no
precedential value to the plaintiff here as the facts are bound to differ from those in the case at bar.
This can be contrasted with common law systems whose intellectual framework comes from judge - made decisional law which gives
precedential authority to prior court
decisions on the principle that it is unfair to treat similar facts differently on different occasions.
The rule also provides that in selecting a Council
decision as
precedential, the DAB Chair may consider
decisions that address, resolve, or clarify recurring legal issues, rules or policies, or that may have broad application or impact, or involve issues of public interest.
While I wait on paperwork from the court, it would appear the Court of Appeals
decision was a Rule 36
decision which has no
precedential value.
While the opinion given by the Supreme Court of Canada is not considered to be of the same
precedential value as the
decisions involving regular litigants, governments do not usually ignore the Court's opinion.
However, common law legal systems give great
precedential weight to case law or precedent and are developed by judges through
decisions of courts and similar tribunals rather than through statute.
Interestingly, when applied to federal law, California Courts have held just the opposite: that «unpublished federal
decisions can be cited as persuasive but not
precedential authority.»
On May 6, 2016, the North Carolina Supreme Court released a deadlocked 3 - 3
decision, leaving the intermediate appellate
decision undisturbed without
precedential value.
Regardless of the (perhaps temporary) loss of
precedential value of the Jane Doe
decision, employers should continue to be sensitive to the issues that this tort raises and consider it to be an example of what they might have to deal with in the future.
As well, the
decision on a full record would likely have important
precedential value.
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday agreed to hear an appeal of a
precedential Third Circuit
decision holding that companies can be held liable under maritime law for asbestos - related injuries if a manufacturer could have reasonably foreseen asbestos would be later added to its product.
While the
decision is not
precedential in Western Pennsylvania (where I represent clients in family law matters), it may signal a shift in the perspectives of the family courts.
The
precedential value of reported
decisions is improved because
decisions are based upon interpretation of the legal guidelines rather than broad discretion.
While the
decision is not
precedential in Western Pennsylvania (where I represent clients in family law matters), it...
[14] These «clearly established principles of law» do not emanate solely from
precedential appellate
decisions, but rather «can derive from a variety of legal sources, including recent controlling case law, rules of court, statutes, and constitutional law.»
Many readers will have a deeper understanding of the system and conventions of U.S. jurisprudence than I have, so comments and corrections on this point are welcome, but doesn't publication in a law report offer
precedential value not available to unpublished
decisions — of which there are many more?
Older
decisions (should) have
precedential value, regardless of whether they were reported.
The said judicial
decisions had a
precedential impact across certain areas of corporate law and with regard to personal liability for corporate management.
Even then, the Judge's
decision has no
precedential effect unless the Court of Appeals affirms it.