Do you believe that federal appellate court panels should be able to designate some of their rulings as «non-precedential» upon issuance, or should
the precedential value of an opinion be left to later panels to determine; and why?
Where do you stand on the question of allowing citation to «unpublished» opinions; do you believe that federal appellate court panels should be able to designate some of their rulings as «non-precedential» upon issuance, or should
the precedential value of an opinion be left to later panels to determine; and why?
[10] This Court has no jurisdiction to suspend
the precedential value of Grant Thornton Ltd. v. Alberta Energy Regulator and introduce another legal regime — the one in place before Chief Justice Wittmann released his judgment — for the governance of other bankrupts, receivers and trustees in bankruptcy and secured creditors for a period commencing with the date of pronouncement of any stay order and ending with the date the Supreme Court of Canada either resolves an appeal against this Court's judgment or dismisses the applicants» leave - to - appeal application.
Despite its mootness, the Province advances the argument that the Court of Appeal should consider the issues on appeal so as to address
the precedential value of the Chambers Judge's order and since other taxpayers will likely pursue the same interim remedy.
The precedential value of reported decisions is improved because decisions are based upon interpretation of the legal guidelines rather than broad discretion.
The CaseBase Signals help you to research
the precedential value of the cases you rely on.
Regardless of the (perhaps temporary) loss of
precedential value of the Jane Doe decision, employers should continue to be sensitive to the issues that this tort raises and consider it to be an example of what they might have to deal with in the future.
Annoyed at what he seemed to regard as the senator's refusal to take a de facto yes answer, the judge committed himself ever more forcefully to what he thought to be
the precedential value of Brown.
But this specified expertise can not be imputed to all sorts of administrative decision - makers, and so
the precedential value of Pezim and Southam is limited.
Not exact matches
Within days the Home School Legal Defense Association (HSLDA), a national organization with more than 14,000 member families in California, had collected over 250,000 signatures calling on the California Supreme Court to «depublish» the appellate court's ruling, which would strip it
of precedential value.
Commercial publishers also use legal staff to screen decisions and make judgment calls on what decisions should be considered material
of precedential value, and therefore be included in their databases.
«The
precedential value [
of the decision] is huge.
Unlike the legal naysayers noted above, the new users
of these historical cases will see not old and dead law
of little
precedential value but new and living documents
of immense historical and social interest.
The 2/5 found persuasive the line
of reasoning that an «action» does not encompass a defense, as articulated in the Exxess and Gil given that Mountain Air was depublished and
of no
precedential value given its pendency for state supreme court review.
On at least three different occasions during the hour and a half negotiation either I or the opposing attorney asked for language in the agreement based on nothing more than our clear expectation that the family court judges could not be expected to follow case law on what is a change
of circumstances or not giving
precedential value to a temporary order at the final hearing.
«However, as appellate interpretation
of standard form contracts will have greater
precedential value, this should eventually reduce litigation and limit future contractual disputes around the standard form clauses,» said Bombier.
There's a broader issue, which is
of interest to anyone using caselaw databases for statistical / quantified analysis (as opposed to
precedential value).
[52] Correspondingly, decisions where the production
of these kinds
of records have been denied will likely have little or no
precedential value to the plaintiff here as the facts are bound to differ from those in the case at bar.
While I wait on paperwork from the court, it would appear the Court
of Appeals decision was a Rule 36 decision which has no
precedential value.
While the opinion given by the Supreme Court
of Canada is not considered to be
of the same
precedential value as the decisions involving regular litigants, governments do not usually ignore the Court's opinion.
While the Nortel case arose from a unique set
of circumstances, its importance and future
precedential value should not be underestimated.
Second, there is no
precedential value in any
of the terms
of the order.
«Right now, courts rely on traditional publishers to publish material
of precedential value,» Cormier says.
Let me please add this caveat: Please take your time to read these unpublished opinions and please do not simply dismiss them because they are
of «no
precedential value.»
Where, like here, the matter involves the interpretation
of a standard form contract, the interpretation at issue is
of precedential value, and there is no meaningful factual matrix specific to the parties to assist the interpretation process, this interpretation is better characterized as a question
of law subject to a correctness review.
Many readers will have a deeper understanding
of the system and conventions
of U.S. jurisprudence than I have, so comments and corrections on this point are welcome, but doesn't publication in a law report offer
precedential value not available to unpublished decisions —
of which there are many more?
At Slaw we've referred from time to time to the practice in some US courts
of declining any
precedential value to cases.
This type
of argument is much more effective when the opinion announcing the proposition is
of significant
precedential value — e.g., an announcement
of legal principles by a higher (or highest) court.
The court held that an appeal from a trial judge's interpretation
of a standard form contract, that has
precedential value and does not require engagement with any meaningful factual matrix, is a question
of law that should be reviewed for correctness.
Stare decisis is also defended on the ground that it increases the «perceived integrity
of the judicial process» by promoting the appearance
of the rule
of law.52 When courts cavalierly overrule their own precedent, they may reduce the public's confidence in the view that judges are constrained by the principles
of law they espouse.53 However, granting binding
precedential value to secret opinions fails to promote the appearance
of the rule
of law, precisely because these opinions are secret.
Taken together, the analysis in this Comment suggests that the justifications most commonly offered in defense
of stare decisis — rule
of law, appearance
of the rule
of law, and deference to legislative authority — do not support affording binding
precedential value to secret opinions
of the kind sometimes issued by the FISA courts.61
[34] Google's argument that a refusal to grant a stay pending the hearing
of the appeal, or what it refers to as «the enforcement
of the order» pending the appeal, will itself have significant and negative
precedential value.
In the meantime, it has
precedential value whatever a justice
of this Court may say on a stay application.
Web 2.0 matters for the legal profession, because it promotes an information environment in which lawyers can simplify access to material
of precedential value.
Yes, many courts in most countries still express a preference for print citations, or at least to citations only to those cases they or case law publishers have deemed
of precedential value.
Older decisions (should) have
precedential value, regardless
of whether they were reported.
It's one
of those cases that I don't think it's technically been overruled yet, but I think it's widely recognized as not having
precedential value.