Sentences with phrase «precise temperature data»
Are precise temperature data from a few hundred years ago all that relevant or necessary, except int he context of local events?
https://wattsupwiththat.com/
Because friction is dissipated as heat, precise temperature data should fill a crucial knowledge gap.
Not exact matches
It stores quite a bit of data, 12 consecutive results to be precise, which makes monitoring your baby's temperature over time that much easier.
«Single molecules can work as reproducible transistors — at room temperature: Researchers are first to reproducibly achieve the current blockade effect using atomically precise molecules at room temperature, a result that could lead to shrinking electrical components + boosting data storage + computing power.»
In addition, the data density and geographic extent of this study is far greater than most previous studies because over 16,000 stream temperature sites were used with thousands of biological survey locations to provide precise information at scales relevant to land managers and conservationists.
Kalnay and Cai developed a more precise measurement by comparing one set of long - term temperature data recorded from satellite and weather balloons, which detect the effects of warming from greenhouse gases, with another set recorded at ground level by 1,982 weather stations across the continent.
With limited data, it was impossible to estimate the precise temperature inside the disk, which is essential for the understanding of the planet formation in the disk.
One reason why recognizing the importance of the fact that Mann's statistical methods and hence conclusions are faulty is that to demonstrate that the current warming is unprecedented and therefore likely anthropogenic is that sufficiently precise paleoclimate temperature indicators and data is hard to come by.
But at some point, both the temperature data and the CO2 data are too uncertain to give a precise value to that effect.
The second false premise is the author's claim that Argo temperature data is precise to 0.1 deg C, a really blatant misreading of the instrument's capability.
It is maddeningly difficult to track down an exact figure for the pre-industrial global temperature, partially because of a lack of precise data, partially because of politics, and partially because of the impenetrability of scientific writing.
One reason why recognizing the importance of the fact that Mann's statistical methods and hence conclusions are faulty is that to demonstrate that the current warming is unprecedented and therefore likely anthropogenic is that sufficiently precise paleoclimate temperature indicators and data is hard to come by.
The estimates of temperature change in the paper by Feulner / Rahmstorf and other papers with similar results are surrounded by too much uncertainty to be taken as precise values, but the general range is supported by correlation with historical data.
The bureau states it is important to note that minimum temperature data to the nearest degree was not wrong, but simply less precise than the raw data.
One assumes that nobody waved a magic wand and decreed «let there be MMTS» there must have been an adoption R&R process where the new sensors were validated against the old across the full range of temperatures, seasons and sub-climates; in the presence of a calibrated third instrument more precise than both candidates; with data collected to estimate the error in the instrument, the error in the measurement process, drift rates and recalibration intervals.
Atmospheric CO2, CH4 and N2O have varied almost synchronously with global temperature during the past 800000 years for which precise data are available from ice cores, the GHGs providing an amplifying feedback that magnifies the climate change instigated by orbit perturbations [29 — 31].
... my quick review of these data here shows that including Khadyta River raw data in the Yamal chronology does not result in a more accurate nor precise understanding of past temperatures in the region.
In fact, the data that diverged was against the most accurate of all temperature records (1960 - now) and it is therefore the most precise.
After all, the early (pre-instrumental) data are much less > reliable as indicators of global temperature than is apparent in modern > calibrations that include them and when we don't know the precise role of > particular proxies in the earlier portions of reconstruction it remains > problematic to assign genuine confidence limits at multidecadal and longer > timescales.