Specifically, Defendants made false and / or misleading statements and / or failed to disclose that: (i) the
Company was engaged in
predatory lending practices that saddled subprime borrowers and / or those with poor or limited credit histories with high - interest rate debt that they could not repay; (ii) many of the
Company's customers were using Qudian - provided
loans to repay their existing
loans, thereby inflating the
Company's revenues and active borrower numbers and increasing the likelihood of defaults; (iii) the
Company was providing online
loans to college students despite a governmental ban on the practice; (iv) the
Company was engaged overly aggressive and improper collection practices; (v) the
Company had understated the number of its non-performing
loans in the Registration Statement and Prospectus; (vi) because of the
Company's improper lending, underwriting and collection practices it was subject to a heightened risk of adverse actions by Chinese regulators; (vii) the
Company's largest sales platform and strategic partner, Alipay, and Ant Financial, could unilaterally cap the APR for
loans provided by Qudian; (viii) the
Company had failed to implement necessary safeguards to protect customer data; (ix) data for nearly one million
Company customers had been leaked for sale to the black market, including names, addresses, phone numbers,
loan information, accounts and, in some cases, passwords to CHIS, the state - backed higher - education qualification verification institution in China, subjecting the
Company to undisclosed risks of penalties and financial and reputational harm; and (x) as a result of the foregoing, Qudian's public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.