In other words,
predestination teaches us about who gets glorified, not who gets justified.
And while predestination of some kind is the Bible, it is something else to say that the very specific two-fold positive
predestination taught by Calvin is in the Bible.
Not exact matches
1) The Bible DOES NOT
teach predestination 2) The Bible DOES NOT
teach that the «wicked» will suffer for all eternity in a hellfire 3) Not all people will go to Heaven
Finally, this series of posts on election will close with an explanation of what I believe the Bible
teaches about election and
predestination.
And if you think that «Calvinist theology is the opposite of Catholic theology», then you are completely ignorant of the numerous Catholic theologians who also
taught strict election and
predestination (including St. Augustine, whom Calvin quotes more than any other theologian).
Four or five nights a week, the septuagenarian Efird can still be found at a church on some godforsaken highway
teaching why the rapture is not part of the book of Revelation or showing that Calvin's doctrine of double
predestination isn't found in Romans.
On the other hand, there were other men who disagreed: Tertullian, who believed that the soul would live on forever, that the wicked would suffer misery in proportion to the righteous» reward; St. Augustine, who came up with the doctrines of Original Sin and
Predestination (some would be saved, the rest would be damned); and Jerome, who would end up retranslating the Latin Bible into what would become the Latin Vulgate and would twist various scriptures that talked about eonian chastening into
teaching eternal torment.
What does the Bible
teach about gender roles, about wealth and poverty, about violence, about capital punishment, about
predestination?
His doctoral dissertation was on Duns Scotus on
predestination and his habilitation (the second dissertation required to
teach in the German universities) addressed the concept of analogy from the ancient Greeks through the medieval period.
As a small contribution to this discussion: One implication of the Calvinistic doctrine of
predestination, if it really is what the Bible
teaches, is that someone may spend his or her life passionately serving in a full - time church capacity and yet not be one of the elect (and therefore «saved»).
The Bible
teaches that
predestination is about our glorification and sanctification; not about justification.
Though many Calvinists argue that double
predestination is the only logical conclusion to the Calvinist position on God's election of some (but not all) to receive eternal life, I am not going to belabor the point or try to refute the idea since most Calvinists claim that they do not
teach or believe it... (for more on reprobation and double
predestination I recommend this book: Vance: The Other Side of Calvinism, pp, 250 - 333).
Before we discuss what this verse is
teaching on
predestination, we should make sure that we understand what the word «
predestination» means.
Many Presbyterians, for example, no longer found the standard Calvinist
teachings on double
predestination and limited atonement compelling, and efforts were made to alter the Westminster Shorter Catechism to reflect a «modern» point of view.
George Whitefield believed in
predestination, but the Wesleys followed the
teaching of the Dutch Reformed theologian Jacobus Arminius (1560 - 1609) who held that Christ died for all people.
Their leading theologian was Jacob Arminius, a former student of Beza who had become convinced that
predestination as
taught by Calvin was untenable.
At one extreme, the Jabriya
taught absolute
predestination, which really makes a mockery of human freedom.
The dogma of Double
Predestination is a product of human logic which can - not withstand the a-logical
teaching of the Scripture.