If you are an adherent of sound scientific method, you must NECESSARILY be a skeptic in this as in all other areas of inquiry, and the «climate scientists» complicit in the push for the abrogation of scientific method are by definition NOT «doing
science, gathering data, testing,» but rather presenting the seeming of scientific investigation while all the while using that masquerade to advance public policy measures
predicated upon malicious nonsense.
While the workshop was built
upon the advances that physics, geochemistry, biology, and physical
sciences have made in defining the causes of climate change and economics in defining its solutions, the meeting was
predicated on the shared recognition that building shared understanding of climate risks and choices in the United States is now as much a psychological and social issue as it is a scientific issue.