But humans are not the cause of the current changes any more than they were for the impossible - for - models - to -
predict Medieval Warm Period and Little Ice Age.
Not exact matches
The priests will explain that the Hockey Stick graph is really not faked [there was no
Medieval Warming Period, ity was made up by the oil / gas / coal industry], the dangerous warming they predicted 25 years ago really, really happened (it just got buried in the deep oceans — at a time when the pacific is unnaturally cold) and
Warming Period, ity was made up by the oil / gas / coal industry], the dangerous
warming they predicted 25 years ago really, really happened (it just got buried in the deep oceans — at a time when the pacific is unnaturally cold) and
warming they
predicted 25 years ago really, really happened (it just got buried in the deep oceans — at a time when the pacific is unnaturally cold) and so on..
The Neptune / Uranus factor is a lot weaker around the time of the
Medieval Warm Period (Jupiter & Saturn not aligning) with very little disturbance (not unlike the overall weakening trend we are starting to experience now), but still I
predict a weak solar grand minimum (see prediction at end of report).
For example, Grinsted et al. (2009)
predicts GSL swings with ∼ 4 times larger amplitude (with much higher sea levels during the
Medieval Warm Period).
Small wonder, then, that the modelers» computer «reconstructions» of the planet's past climate conveniently wiped out the well - documented three - centuries - long
Medieval Warming Period, as well as the subsequent 500 years of Little Ice Age — nor is it surprising that their terrifying computer prognostications in the IPCC's 2001 Third Assessment failed to predict the next decade's absence of any global warming trend
Warming Period, as well as the subsequent 500 years of Little Ice Age — nor is it surprising that their terrifying computer prognostications in the IPCC's 2001 Third Assessment failed to
predict the next decade's absence of any global
warming trend
warming trend at all.
Anyone who admits that would also have to admit that the climate models (which don't «
predict» a
Medieval Warm Period) are inadequate, don't understand all the forcings, and are therefore woefully inadequate for attribution studies (the ones that «tell» us what caused the latest
warming).
Science: IPCC models climate without accounting for the known, dominant climate events of the past (e.g., the ice ages, the interglacial epochs, the
Medieval Warm Period, the Little Ice Age, sudden changes in the slope of temperature instrument record), and
predicting only an unverifiable catastrophe.