Lawyers need to also take advantage of new tools which development in technology have brought about to work more effectively — lawyers now have access to tools that help make contract drafting and review quicker using artificial intelligence; tools that speed up research time by using electronic law reports, and there are even tools in other jurisdictions which attempt to use data to
predict outcomes of court cases using predictive analytics.
«Ross [the application] can, for example,
predict the outcome of court cases, suggest readings or answer a wide variety of legal precedent questions, at any point in a legal process.
Not exact matches
Virginia Rutledge, counsel for The Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts (which filed a friend
of the
court brief in the case), told A.i.A., «The outcome can't be predicted based on questions raised during oral argument, but the Court has before it very compelling arguments for Prince's transformative use of Cariou's imagery and the significance of the First Amendment speech interests at stake, and was openly dismissive of allegations of market harm.&r
court brief in the
case), told A.i.A., «The
outcome can't be
predicted based on questions raised during oral argument, but the
Court has before it very compelling arguments for Prince's transformative use of Cariou's imagery and the significance of the First Amendment speech interests at stake, and was openly dismissive of allegations of market harm.&r
Court has before it very compelling arguments for Prince's transformative use
of Cariou's imagery and the significance
of the First Amendment speech interests at stake, and was openly dismissive
of allegations
of market harm.»
Case law is very helpful in guiding clients on unclear areas of the law or areas in which there is a broad discretion available to the court, in assisting them in predicting a possible range of outcomes if they proceed with their c
Case law is very helpful in guiding clients on unclear areas
of the law or areas in which there is a broad discretion available to the
court, in assisting them in
predicting a possible range
of outcomes if they proceed with their
casecase.
In this fantasy league, participants compete against friends, colleagues and adversaries to determine who has the greatest ability to
predict the
outcome of Supreme
Court cases.
Compete against lawyers from across the U.S. to
predict the
outcome of the
court's
cases this term.
FantasyCourt.Com — the Web site where lawyers compete to
predict the
outcome of Supreme
Court cases — today announced the winner
of its 2002 - 2003 challenge.
The first is the wide element
of discretion accorded to divorce
courts in England about the treatment
of parties» assets, which makes it very difficult to
predict the
outcome in any given
case.
The method is the first to
predict the
outcomes of a major international
court by automatically analysing
case text using a machine learning algorithm.
Computers, using complex algorithms to analyze tens
of thousands
of similar
cases and decisions, can now be used to
predict the
outcome of court fights, according to Daniel Katz, an assistant law professor at Michigan State University.
She correctly
predicted the
outcome in 47
of 79 Supreme
Court cases and the split
of justices in 16
of 79
cases.
Researchers have created an artificial intelligence system that has accurately
predicted the
outcomes of many
cases heard at the European
Court of Human Rights (ECHR).
The
outcome of the Art 50
case currently before the Supreme
Court is impossible to
predict, says constitutional specialist Michael Zander QC.
Consider predictive analytics, where the AI software can examine large databases
of court cases and documents and
predict likely
outcomes.
A 2004 paper tried seeing into the future, by using decisions from the nine justices who'd been on the
court since 1994 to
predict the
outcomes of cases in the 2002 term.