«As it's not possible to always successfully
predict volcanic events due to the lack of complete knowledge of the signals leading to catastrophes, these results are an important new finding and ultimately we hope they will contribute to our understanding of where and when the next volcanic eruption will be.»
Infrasound detection may also be useful for
predicting volcanic events.
Not exact matches
I think there is an important context here that is easy to lose in all of the emphasis on the thing that the trees don't appear to be doing well w / (i.e. the response to the high - frequency cooling
events associated primarily with explosive
volcanic eruptions): that's, the thing that the trees appear to be doing remarkably well with, i.e. capturing the long - term trends and low - frequency variability that is
predicted by the climate model simulations.
If by observational data, you mean the amount of aerosols in the atmosphere, I think that would be a key piece of information that would need to be included in the models as without it the response to
volcanic events can not be modeled or
predicted.
It seems obvious that humans will be more commonly engaged in trying to
predict global
volcanic event some time in our future.