Sentences with phrase «predicted by the physics»

Furthermore data also shows now that the stratosphere is cooling as predicted by the physics.

Furthermore data also shows now that the stratosphere is cooling as predicted by the physics.

The climate sensitivity is predicted by physics to be in the ballpark of 1 to 2 C — usually around 1.5 C in line by line computations.

I wasn't aware how much error there was in cloud cover with far fewer clouds predicted by the physics models than the clouds actually observed, except in the very high latitudes where they predict far more than actually observed.

So what do you get when you run your analysis for the relevant period for which a linear trend is claimed, as opposed to the longer 1880 - present timeframe for which we already knew there was no linear trend and that CO2 would not be predicted by physics to dominating natural variation?

Not exact matches

The idea that physics by itself could predict, or even causally explain, all the movements of living human bodies is a pure pipedream.

The implication of the new subatomic physics was that certainty was replaced by probability, or the notion of tendencies rather than absolutes: «we can never predict an atomic event with certainty; we can only predict the likelihood of its happening»... This directly contradicts the mechanistic model we explored above, and it implies that a subject such as normal birth needs to be looked at as a whole rather than its parts...»

By employing state - of - art materials design methods, Dr. Binghai Yan and his collaborators from the Max Planck Institute for Chemical Physics of Solids and Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz in Germany have recently predicted that the oxide compound BaBiO3 combines two required properties, i.e., topological insulator and superconductivity.

They reason that the behaviour of the clock could show whether certain forces of nature fluctuate in a way that is predicted by some exotic theories of physics.

Specifically, during the past two years, he has been refining a proof that no matter what laws of physics govern a universe, there are inevitably facts about the universe that its inhabitants can not learn by experiment or predict with a computation.

Such a particle or particles would look much like the Higgs predicted by theorists and could do the job of helping to endow other particles with mass, but might differ in important ways that would hint at new physics beyond the current set of predictions.

In the 1800s astronomers noticed that this happens at a different rate than predicted by Newtonian physics.

Despite being predicted in the 1960s, the pentaquark is a particle so elusive even the world's largest physics experiment could only discover it by accident

The mathematical symmetries of the resulting equations predict three families of particles, as described by the standard model of physics, though the third family would behave a bit differently.

«Its existence was predicted by the standard model of particle physics and the fact that there's — we got a glimpse of it, it looks like it may very well be there — is a real victory for that model of science where you test, you put forward conceptual models of the way the world or the universe works and test those models against the observations and see the extent to which they can predict new observations and when they do, it gives you increased confidence in the models.

In 1996 Andrew Strominger and Cumrun Vafa of Harvard University were working on the mathematics of string theory, a physics model that describes all fundamental particles as vibrating strands of energy, when they realized that a key property of certain black holes can be predicted by string equations.

The particle's existence was first predicted 50 years ago by several physicists working independently, including Peter Higgs at the University of Edinburgh, as a solution to what had been one of the most vexing mysteries in physics: How do particles acquire mass?

But by 2002 proponents of string theory had begun to realize that their equations were a little too good at predicting the laws of physics.

If, after multiple measurements with this experimental setup, scientists found that the measurements of the particles were correlated more than predicted by the laws of classical physics, Kaiser says, then the universe as we see it must be based instead on quantum mechanics.

They hope to firm up tantalizing hints from an earlier incarnation of the experiment, which suggested that the particle is ever so slightly more magnetic than predicted by the prevailing standard model of particle physics.

And the words are well worth reading in this history of particle physics by the man who predicted the existence ofthe quark.

The ripples in spacetime predicted by general relativity remain one of the most sought - after prizes in physics, and new research narrows estimates of their prevalence

Such particles could be the «superpartners» of existing particles, as predicted by a theory known as supersymmetry, which seeks to unite all of the fundamental forces of physics, except gravity.

During the mid-1990s in a University of Colorado physics lab, Wieman enlisted lasers to bring matter as close to absolute zero as anyone is likely to get — a temperature so low that atoms freeze together into quantum - mechanical clouds predicted by Einstein but never before observed.

This would require neutrinos to behave in ways not predicted by the known laws of physics.

Such a particle would be «much more thrilling than the Higgs boson», says Christoffer Petersson, a theoretical physicist at Chalmers University of Technology in Gothenburg, Sweden — the Higgs was already predicted by the standard model of particle physics when it was discovered in 2012.

In fact, in an assessment earlier this year, Cambridge researchers Professor Roger Pedersen and PhD student Victoria Mascetti concluded that the existence of naive human stem cells required confirmation by other stem cell research groups: «Like Higgs» Boson to the field of particle physics,» they explained, naivety in human stem cells «was predicted from considerations of symmetry and conservation, [but] we are yet to unlock its potential.»

The Pierre Auger Observatory has detected more muons from cosmic - ray showers than predicted by the most up - to - date particle - physics models.

The signal also closely matched that predicted by supercomputer models of black - hole mergers, said LIGO Scientific Collaboration spokeswoman Gabriela Gonzalez, a professor of physics and astronomy at Louisiana State University.

The 21st century is predicted to be the Century of Biology, a shift from the previous century dominated by physics.

What deniers want to do is skip all that, misrepresent the models by claiming they predict steady warming (conflate multi-model ensemble means with individual model runs), and conclude the physics is wrong and CO2 causes less warming.

At this rate the Earth will be 24ºC warmer in just 4000 years, which is quite a bit more than is predicted by conventional physics.

Solar physicists Galina Mashnich and Vladimir Bashkirtsev, of the Institute of Solar - Terrestrial Physics of the Siberian Division of the Russian Academy of Sciences, believe the climate is driven by the sun and predict global cooling will soon occur.

-- never predicted monotonic warming — never predicted that natural variability would cease — do argue for significant warming by the end of the century — suggest several possible causes for the current warming hiatus * — reject claims that the hiatus invalidates any of the above on grounds of robust physics and parsimonious reasoning

As fast as you warm the top, gravity has to move the heat to the bottom to restore the lapse rate, which means that it keeps flowing through the silver to the top, where it flows back to the bottom, where it flows to the top — perpetual motion — of naked heat, absolutely predicted by high school physics.

Their belief came about because the optical physics of aerosols, originating from Sagan and introduced to climate modelling by his ex-students, Lacis and Hansen in 1974 at GISS / NAS, predicts the cloud part of «global dimming», the increase of albedo by aerosols supposed to hide present CO2 - AGW.

There's of course all the new solar physics models that have been released in the past few years which indicates the sun, not CO2, is the primary climate factor, and they are predicting global cooling as well (and having a difficult time getting published and taken seriously by the «consensus» holders):

In Physics, Chemistry and Engineering a model is judged by its performance in predicting future events.